Navigating Great Power Competition in Outer Space: Strategies of Middle Powers, the EU, India, and Japan
Authors
Centre for East Asian Studies (China Division), School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi (New Delhi)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000049
Subject Category: International Relations
Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 524-531
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-03
Accepted: 2026-05-08
Published: 2026-05-26
Abstract
The emergence of outer space as a key arena of competition in the ongoing geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China has raised serious concerns for space security, while also resulting in an intensification of competition between the two powers to shape the rules and norms for the governance of the domain. The changing geopolitical dynamics have led to strategic concerns among Middle Powers in space, namely, the European Union (EU), India, and Japan, resulting in a reconfiguration of their space policies, postures, and partnerships as they seek to deal with the implications of Great Power competition in space and safeguard their interests. In examining their evolving space strategies, the paper argues that the emerging security dilemma(s) in outer space, fueled by great power rivalry, have pushed these powers to place greater emphasis on the security dimension of space. Additionally, it has also led them to adopt a much more proactive and participatory stance in the ongoing contest for influence over rules and norms for space governance. Ultimately, the paper contends that the transition to a multi-polar space order intersecting with Great Power competition has not only intensified militarisation and weaponisation of outer space but has also hampered efforts at formulating international rules and norms for space governance.
Keywords
Great Powers, Competition, Outer Space, Middle Powers, Strategies
Downloads
References
1. Aliberti, M. (2018). India in Space: Between utility and Geopolitics. In Studies in space policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71652-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bayer, L., & Siebold, S. (2025, April 3). Rubio: US is committed to NATO, but Europe must spend more on defence. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/us-has-no-plans-sudden-withdrawal-europe-natos-rutte-says-2025-04-03/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bingen, K. A., & Young, M. (2024). From Earth to Uchū [Report]. CSIS. https://aerospace.csis.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/240823_Bingen_Earth_Uchu-min.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Blazejewski, K. S. (2008). Space weaponization and US-China relations. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2 (1), 33–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Burdette, Z. (2025). The U.S.-China military balance in space. International Security, 49(4), 71–118. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bureau of Public Affairs. (2012). An International Code of Conduct for Outer Space activities: Strengthening Long-Term Sustainability, Stability, Safety, and Security in space. US Department of State. https://2009-2017.state.gov/documents/organization/181208.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cheng, D. (2011). Chinese Lessons from the Gulf Wars. In A. Scobell, D. Lai, & R. Kamphausen (Eds.), Chinese Lessons from Other Peoples’ Wars (pp. 1-338). Strategic Studies Institute. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA553490.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cheng, D. (2016). U.S.-China competition in space. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/testimony/us-china-competition-space [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. China’s Military Strategy (full text). (2015, May 27). https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2015/05/27/content_281475115610833.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Conference on Disarmament. (2008). Draft treaty on the prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space, the threat or use of force against outer space objects (PPWT) (CD/1839). United Nations. https://docs.un.org/en/cd/1839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Conference on Disarmament. (2008). Letter Dated 19 August 2008 From The Permanent Representative of The United States Of America Addressed to The Secretary-General of The Conference Transmitting Comments on the Draft “Treaty on Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space and of the Threat or Use of Force Against Outer Space Objects (PPWT) (CD/1847). United Nations. https://docs.un.org/en/cd/1847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Conference on Disarmament. (2014). United States: Note verbale dated 2 September 2014 from the Delegation of the United States of America to the Conference on Disarmament addressed to the Acting Secretary-General of the Conference transmitting the United States of America analysis of the 2014 Russian-Chinese draft treaty on the prevention of the placement of weapons in outer space, the threat or use of force against outer space object (CD/1998). United Nations. https://docs.un.org/en/cd/1998 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Day, D. A. (2021, June 21). Burning Frost, the view from the ground: shooting down a spy satellite in 2008. The Space Review. https://www.thespacereview.com/article/4198/1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dembling, P. G., & Arons, D. M. (1967). The evolution of the Outer Space Treaty. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 33, 419–456. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=spacelawdocs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Department of Defense. (2020). DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGY SUMMARY. https://media.defense.gov/2020/Jun/17/2002317391/-1/-1/1/2020_DEFENSE_SPACE_STRATEGY_SUMMARY.PDF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Djalal, D. P. (2024, July 4). Middle powers are the new architects of the world order. Nikkei Asia. https://archive.is/20250328150624/https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/Middle-powers-are-the-new-architects-of-the-world-order [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Elliot, D. (2024). Middle powers: What are they and why do they matter? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/01/middle-powers-multilateralism-international-relations/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. European External Action Service. (2014). DRAFT International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/space_code_conduct_draft_vers_31-march-2014_en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Freese, J. J. (2013, July 12). China’s Anti-Satellite Program: They’re Learning. China-US Focus. https://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/chinas-anti-satellite-program-theyre-learning [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Giri, C. (2025, February 10). Space geopolitics: Europe’s call for autonomy. orfonline.org. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/space-geopolitics-europe-s-call-for-autonomy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. González Muñoz, R., & Portela, C. (2023). THE EU SPACE STRATEGY FOR SECURITY AND DEFENCE: TOWARDS STRATEGIC AUTONOMY? Non - Proliferation and Disarmament Papers, 83. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/eunpdc_space_paper_no_83_0.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hagt, E. (2006). Mutually assured vulnerabilities. China Security, 2, 84–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Harrison, T. (2019). China in space: a strategic competition? https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Todd%20Harrison%20USCC%2025%20April.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Harrison, T. (2019). China in space: a strategic competition? https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Todd%20Harrison%20USCC%2025%20April.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Holden, K. (2022). The Ukraine War is remaking global space cooperation. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2022/07/the-ukraine-war-is-remaking-global-space-cooperation/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Irsten, G. (n.d.). The consultation process for the International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities ends. Reaching Critical Will. https://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/news/latest-news/8907-the-consultation-process-for-the-international-code-of-conduct-for-outer-space-activities-ends [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Klimburg-Witjes, N. (2021). Shifting articulations of space and security: boundary work in European space policy making. European Security, 30(4), 526–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1890039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kolovos, A. (2023). Strengthening links between European Union space and defence: adopting a combined approach. Space Policy, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Lai, A. K. (2021). The Cold War, the Space Race, and the Law of Outer Space: Space for Peace. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Liu, Z. (2021, January 18). China-US rivalry: how the Gulf War sparked Beijing’s military revolution. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/military/article/3118083/china-us-rivalry-how-gulf-war-sparked-beijings-military [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Liu, Z. (2023, August 23). China slams US call to ban anti-satellite missile tests as ‘fake arms control.’ South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3232073/china-slams-us-call-ban-anti-satellite-missile-tests-fake-arms-control [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Lodhi, M. (2023). Era of ‘Middle Powers’?. Centre for Governance Studies. https://cgs-bd.com/article/18310/Era-of-%E2%80%98Middle-Powers%E2%80%99 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Manriquez, M. (2007). Japan’s space Law revision: the next step toward Re-Militarization? NTI. https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/japans-space-law-revision/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Moltz, J.C. (2011). Asia’s Space Race: National Motivation, Regional Rivalries, and International Risks. Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2022). Decision not to conduct Destructive, Direct-Ascent Anti-Satellite Missile Testing. https://www.mofa.go.jp/press/release/press3e_000451.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Nagy, S., & Ping, J. (2023, March 14). The end of the normative middle power ship. Australian Institute of International Affairs. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/the-end-of-the-normative-middle-power-ship/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Nucera, G. G. (2018). International Geopolitics and Space Regulation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190647926.013.40 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Pant, H., & Lele, A. (2010). India in Space: Factors shaping the Indian trajectory. Space and Defense, 4(3), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.sd.04.02.1159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Pekkanen, S. M., Aoki, S., & Takatori, Y. (2023). Japan in the New Lunar Space Race. Space Policy, 69, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2023.101577 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Peoples, C. (2013). A normal space power? Understanding ‘security’ in Japan’s space policy discourse. Space Policy, 29(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2013.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Rajagopalan, R. P. (2011). India’s changing policy on space militarization: The impact of China’s ASAT test. India Review, 10(4), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2011.624018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Rajagopalan, R. P. (2012). The space Code of Conduct debate: A View from Delhi. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 6(1), 137–138. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/SSQ/documents/Volume-06_Issue-1/Rajagopalan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Rajagopalan, R. P. (2014, October 27). International Code of Conduct for Outer Space: Major Asian perspectives. ORF. https://www.orfonline.org/research/international-code-of-conduct-for-outer-space-major-asian-perspectives [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Rajagopalan, R. P., & Stroikos, D. (2024). The transformation of India’s space policy: From space for development to the pursuit of security and prestige. Space Policy, 69, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2024.101633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Rose, F. A. (2020, April 27). Managing China’s rise in outer space. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/managing-chinas-rise-in-outer-space/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Samson, V., & Weeden, B. (2023, September 14). US seizes initiative on space security for the first time in decades. C4ISRNet. https://www.c4isrnet.com/opinion/2023/09/14/us-seizes-initiative-on-space-security-for-the-first-time-in-decades/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Schaffer, A., & Bingen, K. A. (2025). Engaging China on Space with Eyes Wide Open. https://www.csis.org/analysis/engaging-china-space-eyes-wide-open [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Secure World Foundation. (2025). https://www.swfound.org/publications-and-reports/2025-global-counterspace-capabilities-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Shambaugh, D. (2002). Modernizing China’s military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Univ of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Sibal, K. (2019, April 4). The A-SAT test restores the India-China strategic balance. Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/the-a-sat-test-restores-the-india-china-strategic-balance/story-jkn9FsMQE3OqNdD7edCIAO.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Smith, M. (2014). U.S. accuses China of conducting another ASAT test. https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/u-s-accuses-china-of-conducting-another-asat-test/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Smith, M. (2022). U.N. approves resolution not to conduct destructive ASAT tests. https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/u-n-approves-resolution-not-to-conduct-destructive-asat-tests/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Steff, R., & Khoo, N. (2014). Hard Balancing in the Age of American Unipolarity: The Russian Response to US Ballistic Missile Defense during the Bush Administration (2001–2008). Journal of Strategic Studies, 37(2), 222–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2013.866556 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Stokes, M., Alvarado, G., Weinstein, E., & Easton, I. (2020). China’s space and counterspace capabilities and activities (By The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission). https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/China_Space_and_Counterspace_Activities.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Stroikos, D. (2023). Still Lost in Space? Understanding China and India’s Anti-Satellite Tests through an Eclectic Approach. Astropolitics, 21(2–3), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2023.2277253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Stroikos, D. (2025, June 5). India’s space policy: between strategic autonomy and alignment with the United States. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/article/indias-space-policy-between-strategic-autonomy-and-alignment-united-states [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Suzuki, K. (2023). Space security in Japan’s new strategy documents. CSIS. https://www.csis.org/analysis/space-security-japans-new-strategy-documents [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Swejis T., & Mazarr, M. J. (2023, April 2). Mind the Middle Powers. War on the Rocks. https://warontherocks.com/2023/04/mind-the-middle-powers/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Tellis, A. J. (2007). China’s military space strategy. Survival, 49(3), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330701564752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. The Space Development Strategy Headquarters, Japan. (2023). SPACE SECURITY INITIATIVE. https://www8.cao.go.jp/space/anpo/kaitei_fy05/enganpo_fy05.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Townsend, B. (2020). Security and stability in the new space age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. U.S. National Space Policy. (2006). U.S. National Space Policy. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/national-space-policy-2006.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. U.S. National Space Policy. (2020). https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National-Space-Policy.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Weisgerber, M. (2023, January 19). U.S. wants changes to the EU Space Code of Conduct. SpaceNews. https://spacenews.com/18667us-wants-changes-to-eu-space-code-of-conduct/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Yoshimatsu, H. (2021). Exploring the China factor in Japan’s foreign and security policy in outer space. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 75(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1882384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Zhang, H. (2006). Security in Space. China Security, 2, 24–36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Zhang, B. (2011). The security dilemma in the U.S.-China military space relationship. Asian Survey, 51(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2011.51.2.311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- China in South Asia and South America: Connections, Intersections and Similarities
- Prospects and Impediments to China-Africa Sports Cooperation in the Contemporary Era
- Decolonising International Relations: African Perspectives on Global Justice - The Case of the Gambia in the International Court of Justice.
- Climate - Induced Displacement and its Implications on Human Security: A Case Study of Ghana
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) in Promoting and Protecting Local Industries in West Africa (2015 – 2024)