A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge and Infection Control Practices among Under- Graduate Nursing Students

Authors

Navya K

Assistant Professor, Dept, of Medical Surgical Nursing, (India)

Senthilkumar Thavasiappan

Professor cum Principal, Dept, of Medical Surgical Nursing, (India)

Johnson L K

Professor cum Vice-Principal, Dept, of Mental Health Nursing, (India)

Abhiram Krishna

B.Sc Nursing Students, Lourde College of Nursing, Taliparamba, Kannur, Kerala. (India)

Angel Joseph

B.Sc Nursing Students, Lourde College of Nursing, Taliparamba, Kannur, Kerala. (India)

Anshiya V V

B.Sc Nursing Students, Lourde College of Nursing, Taliparamba, Kannur, Kerala. (India)

Athul T S

B.Sc Nursing Students, Lourde College of Nursing, Taliparamba, Kannur, Kerala. (India)

Diya Byju

B.Sc Nursing Students, Lourde College of Nursing, Taliparamba, Kannur, Kerala. (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000139

Subject Category: Nursing

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 2609-2617

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-24

Accepted: 2026-08-29

Published: 2026-09-10

Abstract

Infection prevention and control (IPC) is essential for ensuring patient and healthcare worker safety. Nursing students, who begin clinical exposure early in their education, must possess adequate knowledge and practice of IPC to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIS). Aim of this study was to assess the knowledge and practices of infection control among nursing students. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 169 BSc nursing students from 2nd, 4th, and 6th semesters of a selected college in Kannur district. Tools included a demographic proforma, a 24-item knowledge questionnaire, and a 20-item self-reported practice scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation. Results: Most students demonstrated excellent (40.23%) or good (42.01%) knowledge. Practice scores were high, with 89.34% reporting excellent practices. A moderate positive correlation was found between knowledge and practice (r =0.44, p < 0.05). Knowledge showed significant association with age, semester of study, and clinical exposure, while practice did not significantly associate with any demographic variable. Conclusion: Nursing students displayed generally strong knowledge and excellent self-reported practice regarding infection control. However, knowledge-practice gaps persist, emphasizing the need for ongoing skill reinforcement, simulation training, and structured educational interventions. A sim was developed to support these needs.

Keywords

Knowledge; Practice; Infection control practices; Cross-sectional Study; Nursing Students.

Downloads

References

1. Maheshwari V, Kaur R. A study on infection control knowledge and practices among nursing students. Int J Nurs Educ. 2022;14(2):45–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. World Health Organization. Guidelines on core components of infection prevention and control programs at the national and acute health care facility level. Geneva: WHO; 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. World Health Organization. Report on the burden of endemic health care-associated infection worldwide. Geneva: WHO; 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gupta R, Singh A. Hand hygiene compliance and barriers among nursing students: A cross-sectional study from Central India. Indian J Public Health. 2023;67(2):120–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Verma S, Kapoor N. Effectiveness of structured teaching program on infection control practices among B.Sc. Nursing students. Nurs Midwifery Res J. 2023;19(1):35–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mathews J, Koshy R. Evaluating the knowledge-practice gap in infection control among nursing students. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2022;9(3):C6–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection control guidelines. Atlanta: CDC; 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kim H, Park S. Knowledge and practice of infection prevention among nursing students in South Korea. Nurs Health Sci. 2021;23(1):67–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles