A Privacy-Preserving Blockchain Framework for Secure Collaboration in Cloud-Based Applications

Authors

Umme Habeeba fatima

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shadan women’s college of engineering and technology, Hyderabad (India)

Mohammed Mukkaram Ali

Department of Computer, Jazan University (Saudi Arabia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000053

Subject Category: Engineering

Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 607-617

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-16

Accepted: 2026-03-21

Published: 2026-03-28

Abstract

The speed with which cloud computing has been used in cooperative healthcare applications has brought forth numerous concerns as far as data privacy, decentralized trust, and secure access control are concerned. The past systems, which were centralized, are highly susceptible to single points of failure and have a restricted ability to audit sensitive medical information. This paper presents a privacy-sensitive blockchain framework that enables cooperation among people in the early detection of heart disease to work efficiently. To guarantee the secrecy of sensitive identifiers of patients and the integrity of data, the framework employs enlightened cryptography techniques, including, but not limited to, AES-256-GCM encryption and salted SHA-256 hash. The main part of the system is the high-performance stacking ensemble machine learning model, which is composed of the following models: Random Forest, XG Boost, Light GBM, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). Possessing the ability to determine valid and suspicious access requests and effectively estimate the state of heart disease are its major functions. Smart contracts used to uphold an audit trail in an immutable fashion utilise a certified blockchain in which access decisions, audit metadata, and additional blockchain data are stored. To verify scalability and robustness, the framework is assessed using both synthetic and benchmark datasets (UCI Heart Disease). The performance of the ensemble model to improve the accuracy of an enhanced UCI Heart Disease dataset is demonstrated by experimental results showing 95% accuracy, 0.98 ROC-AUC, and better precision-recall than the performance of the individual classifiers. The results prove that the suggested framework provides a scalable, reliable, and regulation-conformant solution to medical collaboration in the cloud that will provide the best balance of top-level security and quality of clinical diagnosis.

Keywords

Machine Learning, XG Boost, Blockchain, Access Control

Downloads

References

1. T. Kumar, A. Dogram, Mahi, and M. Ghosh, “Secure access control of digital evidence using biometric-enhanced attribute-based encryption,” in Proc. 2025 International Conference on Networks and Cryptology (NETCRYPT), New Delhi, India, 2025, pp. 1238–1245. doi:10.1109/NETCRYPT65877.2025.11102292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Singh, P. Tripathi, N. Gupta, D. Raj, and A. Sar, “Smart contract-based crowdfunding: Ensuring security and transparency with Ethereum,” in Proc. 2025 International Conference on Networks and Cryptology (NETCRYPT), New Delhi, India, 2025, pp. 1399–1404. doi:10.1109/NETCRYPT65877.2025.11102542. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. K. M. R. Seetharaman, “Predicting cryptocurrency price movements using machine learning algorithms,” in Proc. 2025 International Conference on Networks and Cryptology (NETCRYPT), New Delhi, India, 2025, pp. 1497–1502. doi:10.1109/NETCRYPT65877.2025.11102487. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST definition of cloud computing,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, NIST Special Publication 800-145, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, and A. Pentland, “Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data,” in Proc. IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), San Jose, CA, USA, 2015, pp. 180–184. doi:10.1109/SPW.2015.27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. H. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Cao, “Blockchain-based data security in cloud computing,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2019, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/CLOUD.2019.00029. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. J. Li, J. Wu, and L. Chen, “Blockchain-based secure data sharing scheme for cloud storage,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 51336–51344, 2018. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. M. Shen, H. Liu, L. Zhu, K. Xu, and S. Yu, “Blockchain-based secure data sharing in cloud computing,” IEEE Network, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 42–48, Sep.–Oct. 2019. doi:10.1109/MNET.2019.1800445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Q. Xu, Z. He, and Z. Li, “A blockchain-enabled framework for secure data sharing in cloud environments,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 160, p. 102637, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. K. Sultan, U. Ruhi, and R. Lakhani, “Conceptualizing blockchain-based frameworks for secure data sharing in cloud environments,” Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018. doi:10.1186/s13677-018-0115-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. M. Conti, S. Kumar, C. Lal, and S. Ruj, “A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1196–1231, 2020. doi:10.1109/COMST.2020.2970609. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. S. Vyas, M. Gupta, and R. Yadav, “Converging blockchain and machine learning for healthcare,” in Proc. 2019 Amity International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AICAI), Dubai, UAE, 2019, pp. 709–711. doi:10.1109/AICAI.2019.8701230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. J. Liu, X. Li, L. Ye, et al., “BPDS: A blockchain-based privacy-preserving data sharing for electronic medical records,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Z. Zhang et al., “A blockchain-based privacy-preserving framework for cross-social network photo sharing,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Y. Zhang et al., “Trusted data sharing with flexible access control based on blockchain,” Computers & Security, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. J. Liu et al., “Conditional anonymous remote healthcare data sharing over blockchain,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 27, no. 5, May 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. “A systematic review of privacy-preserving blockchain applications in healthcare,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, Springer, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Abuhashim and C. C. Tan, “Smart contract designs on blockchain applications,” in Proc. 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Rennes, France, 2020, pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/ISCC50000.2020.9219622. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. M. Muneeb, Z. Raza, I. U. Haq, and O. Shafiq, “SmartCon: A blockchain-based framework for smart contracts and transaction management,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 23687–23699, 2022. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135562. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Grandhi and S. K. Singh, “Performance evaluation and comparative study of machine learning techniques on UCI datasets and microarray datasets,” in Proc. 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI), Tirunelveli, India, 2023, pp. 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles