A Review on Technological Advancement in Charge Storage Technologies for Renewable Energy Applications.
Authors
Nwandieze, Fortune Onyedikachi
Department of Physics with Electronics Technology, School of Science Laboratory Technology University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Department of Physics with Electronics Technology, School of Science Laboratory Technology University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Nwabuzor, Onyelukachukwu Peter
Department of Physics with Electronics Technology, School of Science Laboratory Technology University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Department of Physics with Electronics Technology, School of Science Laboratory Technology University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1304000123
Subject Category: Physics
Volume/Issue: 13/4 | Page No: 1372-1400
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-13
Accepted: 2026-04-19
Published: 2026-05-06
Abstract
The intermittent nature of solar and wind power necessitates reliable energy storage to stabilize electrical grids and enable high renewable penetration. This review provides a systematic assessment of charge storage technologies for renewable energy applications, with emphasis on both conventional systems and emerging post lithium solutions. A structured literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore for the period January 2013 to March 2026, yielding 101 peer reviewed sources after screening. Technologies are analyzed according to their operating mechanisms including electrochemical, electrostatic, mechanical, chemical, and thermal, as well as performance metrics such as energy density, power density, cycle life, and efficiency, and application suitability including grid scale systems, transport, and portable electronics. Key findings include the following: sodium ion batteries have emerged as compelling alternatives to lithium ion batteries for stationary storage due to sodium abundance and manufacturing compatibility, though energy density remains lower; solid state batteries offer intrinsic safety and high volumetric energy but face persistent electrode electrolyte interface challenges; advanced nanostructured materials particularly graphene, MXenes, and silicon based anodes enable hybrid systems that bridge the energy power gap between batteries and supercapacitors; no single technology satisfies all grid requirements, instead portfolios combining fast response supercapacitors for power quality, batteries for hourly shifting, hydrogen for seasonal storage, and thermal storage for concentrated solar power plants are necessary. Limitations of this review include the lack of quantitative meta analysis due to heterogeneous reporting standards. Future research priorities should focus on earth abundant materials, durable solid state interfaces, scalable recycling processes, and hybrid system integration. Charge storage technologies remain a fundamental prerequisite for a renewable powered future.
Keywords
Energy storage; lithium ion batteries; sodium ion batteries; solid state batteries; supercapacitors; renewable energy integration; grid storage; advanced materials.
Downloads
References
1. Adeyemo, I. A., Adelani, S. A., & Adebiyi, O. W. (2024). Energy storage systems: Technologies and high-power applications. Batteries, 10(4), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10040141 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alva, G., Lin, Y., & Fang, G. (2018). An overview of thermal energy storage systems. Energy, 144, 341–378. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aminudin, M. A., Kamarudin, S. K., Lim, B. H., Majilan, E. H., Masdar, M. S., & Shaari, N. (2023). Current progress on hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48, 4371–4388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Amiryar, M. E., & Pullen, K. R. (2017). A review of flywheel energy storage system technologies and their applications. Applied Sciences, 7, 286. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Amiryar, M. E., & Pullen, K. R. (2020). Analysis of standby losses and charging cycles in flywheel energy storage systems. Energies, 13(17), 4441. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13174441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aneke, M., & Wang, M. (2016). Energy storage technologies and real life applications. Applied Energy, 179, 350–377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Arico, A. S., Bruce, P., Scrosati, B., Tarascon, J. M., & Van Schalkwijk, W. (2020). Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nature Materials, 19(8), 813–820. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Armand, M., & Tarascon, J. M. (2018). Building better batteries. Nature, 451(7179), 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1038/451652a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bellani, S., Najafi, L., Martín-García, B., Ansaldo, A., Del Rio Castillo, A. E., Bonaccorso, F., & Pellegrini, V. (2019). Scalable production of graphene inks via wet-jet milling exfoliation for screen-printed micro-supercapacitors. Nature Communications, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09335-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bolt, A., Dincer, I., & Agelin Chaab, M. (2020). A critical review of synthetic natural gas production techniques. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 84, 103670. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Brousse, T., Long, J. W., & Bélanger, D. (2017). Pseudocapacitive vs battery type electrodes: Two distinctive aspects of fast electrochemical processes and devices. ECS Transactions, 75(14), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2017-02/7/605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chen, G. (2017). Supercapacitor and supercapattery as emerging electrochemical energy stores. International Materials Reviews, 62(4), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.1240914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Choudhary, G., Dhariwal, J., Saha, M., Trivedi, S., Banjare, M. K., Kanaoujiya, R., & Behera, K. (2023). Ionic liquids: Environmentally sustainable materials for energy conversion and storage applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25468-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Crawford, M. (2018, October 24). Making the next-generation lithium-ion batteries safer, longer- lasting. ASME. https://www.asme.org/topics-resources/content/making-nextgeneration- lithiumion-batteries-safer [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Danzi, F., Salgado, R. M., Oliveira, J. E., Arteiro, A., & Camanho, P. P. (2021). Structural batteries: A review. Molecules, 26(23), 7208. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Deysher, G., Ridley, P., Ham, S. Y., Doux, J. M., Chen, Y. T., Wu, E. A., Tan, D. H. S., Cronk, A., Jang, J., & Meng, Y. S. (2022). Transport and mechanical aspects of all solid state lithium batteries. Materials Today Physics, 24, 100679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Dogutan, D. K., & Nocera, D. G. (2019). Artificial photosynthesis at efficiencies exceeding natural photosynthesis. Accounts of Chemical Research, 52, 3143–3148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Dunn, B., Kamath, H., & Tarascon, J. M. (2016). Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science, 334(6058), 928–935. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212741 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Dunn, B., Zheng, H., & Gogotsi, Y. (2022). Electrochemical energy storage for the future: Redefining pseudocapacitance. Nature Reviews Materials, 7(6), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00421-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Egorov, V., Gulzar, U., Zhang, Y., O’Dwyer, C., & Nikolayev, V. (2019). Evolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storage. Advanced Materials Technologies, 5(1), 1900441. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900441 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Electricity Magnetism. (2023). What are the different types of energy storage technologies and their applications? Retrieved from https://www.electricity-magnetism.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ferreira-Martínez, D., & López-Agüera, A. (2024, October 4). Effects of including resource intermittency of wind and solar technologies in OSeMOSYS modelling tool. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.0346.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Fleischmann, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Cummings, P. T., Wu, J., Simon, P., Gogotsi, Y., Presser, V., & Augustyn, V. (2022). Continuous transition from double layer to Faradaic charge storage in confined electrolytes. Nature Energy, 7, 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-00962-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Goodenough, J. B., & Park, K. S. (2017). The Li ion rechargeable battery: A perspective. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135(4), 1167–1176. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3091438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Gulzar, U., Glynn, C., & O’Dwyer, C. (2019). Additive manufacturing for energy storage devices: A review. Advanced Energy Materials, 9(23), 1900483. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201900483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Guney, M. S., & Tepe, Y. (2017). Classification and assessment of energy storage systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1187–1197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Hou, J., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Chen, J., Wang, H., Liu, Q., Zhao, S., & Ma, Z. (2024). Composite electrolytes and interface designs for progressive solid‐state sodium batteries. Carbon Energy. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Junaid, T. (2020, March 7). Hybrid energy storage system (HESS): Super capacitor and their use in hybrid energy storage system. LinkedIn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Kleperis, J., Fylenko, V. V., Vanags, M., Volkovs, A., et al. (2016). Energy storage solutions for small and medium-sized self-sufficient alternative energy objects. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 48(Special Issue E), 290–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Koohi Fayegh, S., & Rosen, M. A. (2020). A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments. Journal of Energy Storage, 27, 101047. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Krishan, O., & Suhag, S. (2019). An updated review of energy storage systems. International Journal of Energy Research, 43, 6171–6210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Lee, D., Kakarla, A. K., Sun, S., Kim, P. J., & Choi, J. (2025). Inorganic solid-state electrolytes for solid-state sodium batteries: Electrolyte design and interfacial challenges. ChemElectroChem, 12(1), e202400612. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Li, F., Hou, M., Zhao, L., Zhang, D., Yang, B., & Liang, F. (2024). Electrolyte and interface engineering for solid-state sodium batteries. Energy Storage Materials, 48, 103181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103181 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Liu, C., Li, F., Ma, L. P., & Cheng, H. M. (2019). Advanced materials for energy storage. Advanced Materials, 22(8), E28–E62. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Liu, W., Placke, T., & Chau, K. T. (2022). Overview of batteries and battery management for electric vehicles. Energy Reports, 8, 4058–4084. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Live Science. (2025). Graphene supercapacitor breakthrough could boost energy storage in future EVs and devices. Retrieved from https://www.livescience.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Lü, Z., Kang, J., Qiu, P., & Chen, X. (2024). Hydridoborate-based solid-state electrolytes forsodium metal batteries. Batteries & Supercaps, 7(11), e202400636. https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202400636 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Lukatskaya, M. R., Dunn, B., & Gogotsi, Y. (2018). Multidimensional materials and device architectures for future hybrid energy storage. Nature Communications, 7, 12647. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Lv, Q., Li, C., Liu, Y., Jing, Y., Sun, J., Wang, H., Wang, L., Ren, H., Wu, B., Cheng, T., Wang, D., Liu, H., Dou, S. X., Wang, B., & Wang, J. (2024). In-situ polymerized high-voltage solid-state lithium metal batteries with dual-reinforced stable interfaces. ACS Nano, 18(8), 8234–8247. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c06057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Mahato, A. C., & Ghoshal, S. K. (2019). Various power transmission strategies in wind turbine: An overview. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 7(4), 1285–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-019-00543-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Mahmoud, M., Ramadan, M., Olabi, A. G., Pullen, K., & Naher, S. (2020). A review of mechanical energy storage systems combined with renewable applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 210, 112670. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Mitali, J., Dhinakaran, S., & Mohamad, A. A. (2022). Energy storage systems: A review. Energy Storage and Saving, 1, 166–216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Mukherjee, P., & Rao, V. V. (2019). Development of superconducting magnetic energy storage systems. Physica C Superconductivity and Applications, 563, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Naguib, M., Mochalin, V., Barsoum, M. W., & Gogotsi, Y. (2017). 25th anniversary article: MXenes: A new family of two dimensional materials. Advanced Materials, 26(7), 992– 1005. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Nadeem, F., Hussain, S. M. S., Tiwari, P. K., Goswami, A. K., & Ustun, T. S. (2019). Comparative review of energy storage systems, their roles and impacts on future power systems. IEEE Access, 7, 4555–4585. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2888497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Oladele, I. O., Adelani, S. O., Taiwo, A. S., Akinbamiyorin, I. M., Olanrewaju, O. F., & Orisawayi, A. O. (2025). Polymer based nanocomposites for supercapacitor applications: A review on principles, production and products. RSC Advances. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Okazawa, A., Kakuchi, T., Kawai, K., & Okubo, M. (2023). Iron-based catholytes for aqueous redox-flow batteries. APL Materials, 11(11), 110901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Oudejans, D., Offidani, M., Constantinou, A., Albonetti, S., Dimitratos, N., & Bansode, A. (2023). Optimal design and analysis of a hybrid hydrogen energy storage system for an island- based renewable energy community [Figure]. Energies, 16(21), 7363. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Ouyang, M., Guo, Z., Salinas-Farran, L., Zhao, Y., Zhao, S., Zheng, K., Zhang, H., Wang, M., Li, G., Li, F., Liu, X., Yang, S., Xie, F., Shearing, P. R., Titirici, M.-M., & Brandon, N. P. (2024). High-areal-capacity Na-ion battery electrode with uncompromised energy and power densities by simultaneous electrospinning-spraying fabrication. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2408.11655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Rabi, A., Radulovic, J., & Buick, J. (2023). Comprehensive review of compressed air energy storage technologies. Thermo, 3, 104–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Rahmawati, F., Rustamaji, E., Prakoso, A., Devianto, H., Widiatmoko, P., & Kurnia, R. (2025). Electrochemical double-layer capacitor energy storage mechanisms and performance analysis. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 14(3), 392–403. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Revankar, S. T. (2019). Chemical energy storage. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Rudra, S., Seo, H. W., Sarker, S., Kim, D. M. (2024). Supercapatteries as Hybrid Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices: Current Status and Future Prospects. Molecules. 29 doi: 10.3390/molecules29010243. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Sahu, P. K., Jena, S., & Sahoo, U. (2021). Efficient energy storage systems for wind power applications. In U. Sahoo (Ed.), Energy storage technologies and applications (pp. 123– 156). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119555599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Saeed, M., et al. (2023). A comprehensive review of nanomaterials: Types, synthesis, characterization, and applications [Figure]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368807997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Shi, K., Guan, B., Zhuang, Z., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Ma, Z., Zhu, C., Hu, X., Zhao, S., Dang, H., Guo, J., Chen, L., Shu, K., Li, Y., Guo, Z., Yi, C., Hu, J., & Huang, Z. (2024). Recent progress and prospects on sodium-ion battery and all-solid-state sodium battery: A promising choice of future batteries for energy storage. Energy & Fuels, 38(11), 9280– 9319. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00980 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Siddique, M. T., Nisar, A., Wafad, A. A., Anjum, S., Zahid, U., Syed Akbar, W. A., Mateen, A., Deebaj, M., & Abbas, N. (2025). Advances in nanomaterials for next-generation lithium- ion and solid-state batteries: A physics-driven review. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 13(8), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjet.2025.v13i08.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Simon, P., & Gogotsi, Y. (2020). Perspectives for electrochemical capacitors and related devices. Nature Materials, 19(11), 1151–1163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Singh, A. N., Islam, M., Meena, A., Faizan, M., Han, D., Bathula, C., Hajibabaei, A., Anand, R., & Nam, K. W. (2023). Unleashing the potential of sodium ion batteries: Current state and future directions for sustainable energy storage. Advanced Functional Materials, 33(46), Article 2304617. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202304617 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. SolarPACES. (n.d.). How concentrated solar power works. How concentrated solar power works [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Soloveichik, G. L. (2015). Flow batteries: Current status and trends. Chemical Reviews, 115, 11533–11558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Srividhya, G., & Ponpandian, N. (2023). Pseudocapacitance: Mechanism and characteristics. In Engineering materials (pp. 39–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45430- 1_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Vedhanarayanan, B., & Seetha Lakshmi, K. C. (2024). Beyond lithium-ion: Emerging frontiers in next-generation battery technologies. Frontiers in Battery and Energy Storage, 5, 1377192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbael.2024.1377192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Volfkovich, Y. M. (2024). Electric double layer capacitors (review). Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 60(10), 654–691. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0424857024100022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Wang, F., Wu, X., Yuan, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Fu, L., Zhu, Y., Zhou, Q., Wu, Y., & Huang, W. (2019). Latest advances in supercapacitors from new electrode materials to novel device designs. Chemical Society Reviews, 46(22), 6816–6854. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Wang, H., Yi, H., Chen, X., & Wang, X. (2021). Asymmetric supercapacitors based on nanostructured materials. Nano Energy, 39, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Zhao, P., Wu, C., Wu, X., & Chou, S. L. (2025). Recent advances in hybrid supercapacitors: A review of high performance materials and scalable fabrication techniques. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5TA02887F [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Wei, Q., et al. (2026). Unlocking limited electric double layer capacity via electrochemically driven continuous partial desolvations in carbon nanopores. Nature Communications, 17, 363. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66433-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Yu, M. (2024). Battery components derived from silica-depleted rice hull ash (SDRHA) (Master’s thesis, University of Michigan). University of Michigan Deep Blue Repository. https://doi.org/10.7302/24934 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Zhang, L. L., Zhao, X. S., & Ji, H. (2020). Carbon based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chemical Society Reviews, 38(9), 2520–2531. https://doi.org/10.1039/b813846j [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Zhang, L., Zhao, X., Ji, H., & Li, Y. (2021). Emerging materials for high performance supercapacitors. Energy Storage Materials, 34, 545–576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Zhao, J., & Burke, A. F. (2021). Review on supercapacitors technologies and performance evaluation. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 59, 276–291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study on the Thermal and Electrical Conductivity of Common Materials
- Thickness Dependent Thermoelectric Properties of Pb0.4In0.6Se Thin Films Deposited by Physical Evaporation Technique
- Optimization of a Patch Antenna Using Genetic Algorithm
- Kinematic Constraints On Brown Dwarf Atmospheric Variability And Evidence For Bimodal Formation From Multi-Survey Analysis
- Reservoir Characterization through the Application of Petrophysical Evaluation of Well Logs of Animaux Field, Niger Delta Basin, Nigeria