A Systematic Literature Review on Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Financial Fraud Detection

Financial transaction fraud is a significant problem in the fields of digital banking, credit card transactions, online payment, and mobile financial services. This study systematically reviewed the existing literature on supervised machine learning techniques used for financial fraud detection. The review included peer-reviewed papers published between 2020 and 2026 and followed the PRISMA framework, with Parsifal used to assist the search management, screening, eligibility assessment, and data extraction. A total of 503 records were obtained from IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library. After removing 129 duplicates, screening 374 records, and assessing 107 full-text articles, a total of 55 studies were accepted in the final review. The findings indicated that financial fraud detection relied more on supervised learning which was the method of choice, especially in cases where labelled data of fraudulent and legitimate transactions were known. Credit/debit card fraud was the most common form of fraud, contributing to 40 studies (72.7%) of the reviewed literature. Methodologically, ensemble, boosting, and hybrid classifiers were the most common methods, occurring in 17 studies (30.9%), followed by deep/hybrid representation learning in 12 studies (21.8%) and classical supervised machine learning comparisons in 10 studies (18.2%). The review further indicated that the model performance not only depends on the algorithm choice but also on preprocessing, feature selection, class imbalance handling, and evaluation metrics. The most commonly reported metric was accuracy, which occurred in 52 studies (94.5%), whereas recall/sensitivity was present in 50 studies (90.9%), precision was in 48 studies (87.3%), F1-score was in 47 studies (85.5%), ROC-AUC/AUC was in 42 studies (76.4%), and confusion matrix was in 38 studies (69.1%). The study ends by recommending that effective supervised fraud detection is a complete methodological pipeline and not just isolated algorithm comparison.

Financial Fraud Detection, Supervised Machine Learning, Systematic Literature Review, PRISMA, Parsifal, Class Imbalance.

1. International Criminal Police Organization. (2026, March 16). INTERPOL report warns of increasingly sophisticated global financial fraud threat. INTERPOL. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2026/INTERPOL-report-warns-of-increasingly-sophisticated-global-financial-fraud-threat [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Federal Trade Commission. (2025). Consumer Sentinel Network data book 2024. Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/csn-annual-data-book-2024.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Hashedi, K. G., & Magalingam, P. (2021). Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019. Computer Science Review, 40, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100402 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Afriyie, J. K., Tawiah, K., Pels, W. A., Addai-Henne, S., Dwamena, H. A., Owiredu, E. O., Ayeh, S. A., & Eshun, J. (2023). A supervised machine learning algorithm for detecting and predicting fraud in credit card transactions. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100163 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hafez, I. Y., Hafez, A. Y., Saleh, A., Abd El-Mageed, A. A., & Abohany, A. A. (2025). A systematic review of AI-enhanced techniques in credit card fraud detection. Journal of Big Data, 12, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-01048-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Baesens, B., Höppner, S., & Verdonck, T. (2021). Data engineering for fraud detection. Decision Support Systems, 150, 113492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113492 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, Y., Zhao, C., Xu, Y., Nie, C., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Deep learning in financial fraud detection: Innovations, challenges, and applications. Data Science and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2025.08.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ali, A., Abd Razak, S., Othman, S. H., Eisa, T. A. E., Al-Dhaqm, A., Nasser, M., Elhassan, T., Elshafie, H., & Almogren, A. (2022). Financial fraud detection based on machine learning: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199637 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cherif, A., Badhib, A., Ammar, H., Alshehri, S., Kalkatawi, M., & Imine, A. (2023). Credit card fraud detection in the era of disruptive technologies: A systematic review. Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences, 35(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.11.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Aros, L. H., Bustamante Molano, L. X., Gutierrez-Portela, F., Moreno Hernandez, J. J., & Rodriguez Barrero, M. S. (2024). Financial fraud detection through the application of machine learning techniques: A literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1130. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03606-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Thivaios, S., Kostopoulos, G., Stefani, A., & Kotsiantis, S. (2026). A survey of machine learning and deep learning for financial fraud detection: Architectures, data modalities, and real-world deployment challenges. Algorithms, 19(5), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/a19050354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ileberi, E., Sun, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). A machine learning based credit card fraud detection using the GA algorithm for feature selection. Journal of Big Data, 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-022-00573-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ghosh Dastidar, K., Jurgovsky, J., Siblini, W., & Granitzer, M. (2022). NAG: Neural feature aggregation framework for credit card fraud detection. Knowledge and Information Systems, 64, 831–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01653-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Du, H., Lv, L., Guo, A., & Wang, H. (2023). AutoEncoder and LightGBM for credit card fraud detection problems. Symmetry, 15(4), 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15040870 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Van Belle, R., Baesens, B., & De Weerdt, J. (2023). CATCHM: A novel network-based credit card fraud detection method using node representation learning. Decision Support Systems, 164, 113866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2022.113866 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Salekshahrezaee, Z., Leevy, J. L., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2023). The effect of feature extraction and data sampling on credit card fraud detection. Journal of Big Data, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00684-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Siam, A. M., Bhowmik, P., & Uddin, M. P. (2025). Hybrid feature selection framework for enhanced credit card fraud detection using machine learning models. PLOS ONE, 20(7), e0326975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gupta, R. K., Hassan, A., Majhi, S. K., Parveen, N., Zamani, A. T., Anitha, R., Ojha, B., Singh, A. K., & Muduli, D. (2025). Enhanced framework for credit card fraud detection using robust feature selection and a stacking ensemble model approach. Results in Engineering, 26, 105084. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. George, R., & Roy, B. (2022). Handling class imbalance in fraud detection using machine learning techniques. In A. Kumar, S. Senatore, & V. K. Gunjan (Eds.), ICDSMLA 2020: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (Vol. 783, pp. 803–813). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3690-574 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ileberi, E., & Sun, Y. (2024). Advancing model performance with ADASYN and recurrent feature elimination and cross-validation in ML-assisted credit card fraud detection: A comparative analysis. IEEE Access, 12, 133315-133327. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3457922 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Albalawi, T., & Dardouri, S. (2025). Enhancing credit card fraud detection using traditional and deep learning models with class imbalance mitigation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1643292. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1643292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Damanik, I. S., & Liu, Y. (2025). Advanced fraud detection: Leveraging K-SMOTEENN and stacking ensembles to tackle data imbalance and extract insights. IEEE Access, 13, 10356-10370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3528079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Vanini, P., Rossi, S., Zvizdic, E., & Domenig, T. (2023). Online payment fraud: From anomaly detection to risk management. Financial Innovation, 9, 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00470-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Baisholan, N., Dietz, J. E., Gnatyuk, S., Turdalyuly, M., Matson, E. T., & Baisholanova, K. (2025). FraudX AI: An interpretable machine learning framework for credit card fraud detection on imbalanced datasets. Computers, 14(4), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14040120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Awad, S. S., Hamza, A. A., Sobh, M. A., & Bahaa-Eldin, A. M. (2026). Applying explainable artificial intelligence to interpret supervised ensemble learning models for robust credit card fraud detection. Scientific Reports, 16, 15220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49939-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet