Activity-Based Costing: A Hybrid Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends, Implementation Barriers, and Future Directions

Authors

Angga Anggasmara Putra

Program Studi Magister Ilmu Akuntansi , Fakultas Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung (Indonesia)

Aristanti Widyaningsih

Program Studi Magister Ilmu Akuntansi , Fakultas Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung (Indonesia)

Denny Andriana

Program Studi Magister Ilmu Akuntansi , Fakultas Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung (Indonesia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110113

Subject Category: Accounting

Volume/Issue: 12/11 | Page No: 1263-1281

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-22

Accepted: 2025-12-01

Published: 2025-12-18

Abstract

Activity-Based Costing (ABC) represents a critical management accounting innovation for enhancing cost allocation accuracy and supporting organizational strategic decision-making. Despite substantial theoretical advantages and documented practical benefits, significant implementation-effectiveness gaps persist, with 40-60% of ABC implementations failing to achieve intended outcomes or being abandoned within three years.
Objectives and Methods: This hybrid systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis employed PRISMA-guided procedures to comprehensively synthesize global ABC research (1973-2024). From an initial pool of 3,904 Scopus publications, 49 high-quality open-access journal articles met rigorous inclusion criteria. Qualitative synthesis and quantitative bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix provided complementary analytical perspectives. The review explicitly acknowledges that reliance on open-access articles may exclude high-impact research from subscription-based premium journals and multinational corporations, potentially underrepresenting Western-centric scholarship.
Results: ABC continues as a dynamic research domain with sustained upward publication trajectory, particularly since 2010, demonstrating robust academic interest and future relevance. Analysis identifies five distinct research clusters: traditional ABC applications (36.7%), implementation barriers (30.6%), technology integration (24.5%), sector-specific applications (28.6%), and sustainability integration (12.2%). Implementation outcomes prove heterogeneous: 53% report substantial benefits, 37% mixed outcomes, and 16% document failures, confirming ABC effectiveness is context-dependent. Geographic analysis reveals pronounced Western concentration (81.6%), while emerging markets remain substantially underrepresented. Methodological analysis reveals case study dominance (71.4%) with significant longitudinal investigation gaps (4.1%). Critical research gaps emerge in technology integration: minimal representation of artificial intelligence (1 occurrence), Internet of Things (2 occurrences), and Industry 4.0 keywords despite their strategic organizational significance.
Conclusions: ABC stands as a dynamic, evolving domain with demonstrated theoretical validity and practical utility. Priority future research includes longitudinal studies, comparative international research addressing geographic gaps, systematic investigation of technology integration pathways particularly in Industry 4.0 environments, and sectoral expansion toward emerging digital business models. Organizations should implement contingency-based frameworks acknowledging context-dependency of ABC effectiveness.

Keywords

Activity-Based Costing; Systematic Literature Review; Bibliometric Analysis

Downloads

References

1. 1 Abeygunasekera, A. W. J. C., Bandara, W., Wynn, M., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Nexus between business process management (BPM) and accounting: A literature review and future research directions. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2016-0235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2 Al Askary, Z. M. S. N., Kadhim, H. O., & Ali Alesaa, A. H. M. (2020). Using time driven activity based costing (TDABC) in measuring the cost of bank service (applied study in Al-Rafidain bank). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(3), 336–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3 Alsmadi, M., Almani, A., & Khan, Z. (2014). Quality paper implementing an integrated ABC and TOC approach to enhance decision making in a lean context: A case study. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 31(8), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2013-0063 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4 Avogaro, D., Cassandro, J., Dall'Anese, E., Dori, C., Farina, A., & Laurini, E. (2025). Mapping cost intersection through LCC, BIM, and AI: A systematic literature review for future opportunities. Buildings, 15(3), 18–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5 Balon, P., Buchtová, J., & Sušková, A. (2018). Implementation of activity-based costing in heat treatment processes. In METAL 2018: International conference on metallurgy and materials (pp. 1863–1869). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6 Bogdánoiu, C. (2009). Activity based cost from the perspective of competitive advantage. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 4(1), 5–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7 Cinquini, L., Vitali, P. M., Pitzalis, A., & Campanale, C. (2009). Process view and cost management of a new surgery technique in hospital. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003775 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8 Dwivedi, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2015). Development of an activity based costing model for a government hospital. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2014.9.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 9 Grandlich, C. (2004). Using activity-based costing in surgery. AORN Journal, 79(1), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)61152-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10 Hofmann, E., & Bosshard, J. (2017). Supply chain management and activity-based costing: Current status and directions for the future. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 47(8), 712–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-04-2017-0158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11 Hoque, Z. (2005). Securing institutional legitimacy or organizational effectiveness? A case examining the impact of public sector reform initiatives in an Australian local authority. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510599274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12 Kabinlapat, P., & Sutthachai, S. (2017). An application of activity-based costing in the chicken processing industry: A case of joint products. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 20(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2016.0017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13 Khadem, S. M., Ahmadi, I., Rahmati, D., & Yavari, A. (2016). Reviewing organizational problems with respect to the implementation of Activity-Based Costing in the police university. International Business Management, 10(11), 2109–2114. https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2016.2109.2114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14 Kucera, T. (2019). Application of the activity-based costing to the logistics cost calculation for warehousing in the automotive industry. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 21(4), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.c.2019.4.35-42 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15 Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025). Guidelines for bibliometric-systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 16 Moradi, S., Hedayatizadeh-Omran, A., Janbabaei, G., Alizadeh-Navaei, R., Panbehchi, M., Geraili, B., Fallahpour, S., & Eshaghi, H. (2018). Activity based costing of educational services in faculty of medicine in mazandaran university of medical sciences, Iran, 2015. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 28(163), 86–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17 Niñerola, A., Hernández-Lara, A.-B., & Sánchez-Rebull, M.-V. (2021). Improving healthcare performance through Activity-Based Costing and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 36(6), 2079–2093. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18 Ortiz-Cea, V., Dote-Pardo, J., Geldres-Weiss, V. V., & Peña-Acuña, V. (2025). The role of activity-based costing in reducing environmental impact: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(3), 12–75. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031275 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19 Pandey, S. (2012). Applying the ABCs in provider organizations. Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, 66(11), 112–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 20 Pinto, R. H. F., Scarduelli, B. C., Pinto, A. R. F., Costa, V. M. H. M., Costa, H. G., & Nagano, M. S. (2023). Integration of activity-based costing and analytical hierarchical process applied to a poultry equipment company. Custos e Agronegócio, 19(3), 300–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 21 Pokorná, J. (2016). Impact of Activity-Based Costing on financial performance in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(2), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664020643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 22 Quesado, P., & Silva, R. (2021). Activity-based costing (ABC) and its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. 23 Rahman, M. A., Ali, M. H., & Abdual Hussein, R. H. (2019). The integration time-driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) and events approach: Their role in decision-making and their effect on tourism. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. 24 Rundora, R., & Selesho, J. (2014). Determinants of and barriers to the adoption of activity-based costing for manufacturing SMEs in South Africa's Emfuleni municipality. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p30 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. 25 Sánchez-Rebull, M.-V., Niñerola, A., & Hernández-Lara, A.-B. (2023). After 30 years, what has happened to activity-based costing? A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231178785 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. 26 Saryazdi, S. K. (2017). The feasibility of implementing Activity-Based Costing (ABC) in Samen Credit Institution. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(11), 2811–2816. https://doi.org/10.3923/jeasci.2017.2811.2816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. 27 Schulist, S. (2004). Using ABC to manage and improve at CONCO foods. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 15(3), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.20004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. 28 Simmons, C., Wright, M., & Jones, V. (2006). Full costing of business programs: Benefits and caveats. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540610639576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. 29 Stefano, N. M., & Filho, N. C. (2013). Activity-based costing in services: Literature bibliometric review. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-80 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. 30 Suthummanon, S., Ratanamanee, W., Boonyanuwat, N., & Saritprit, P. (2011). Applying activity-based costing (ABC) to a parawood furniture factory. Engineering Economist, 56(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2010.549936 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. 31 Tuncel, G., Akyol, D. E., Bayhan, G. M., & Koker, U. (2005). Application of Activity-Based Costing in a manufacturing company: A comparison with traditional costing. In Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3516, pp. 562–569). https://doi.org/10.1007/11428862_77 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. 32 Ussahawanitchakit, P. (2017). Activity-based costing of canned and processed foods businesses in Thailand: Effects on organizational development, business competitiveness and corporate success. Business: Theory and Practice, 18, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2017.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. 33 Zanievicz, M., Beuren, I. M., dos Santos, P. S. A., & Kloeppel, N. R. (2013). Costing methods: Meta-analysis of articles presented in the Brazilian Congress of Costs over the 1994-2010 period. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 15(49), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v15i49.1062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles