Aesthetic Pedagogy as Emotional Architecture: A Conceptual Framework for B.Ed. Classrooms

Authors

Srijita Sarkar

Assistant Professor, Bhimpur Mohanananda College of Education, West Bengal (India)

Arpita Pal

Assistant Professor, Bhimpur Mohanananda College of Education, West Bengal (India)

Ratan Pramanick

Teacher-In-Charge, Bhimpur Mohanananda College of Education, West Bengal (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12110172

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 12/11 | Page No: 1946-1951

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-11

Accepted: 2025-12-18

Published: 2025-12-23

Abstract

Aesthetic dimensions of teacher education are frequently marginalized in favor of curriculum delivery and assessment, despite substantial evidence that learning environments significantly influence emotion, cognition, and professional identity. While existing research has examined learning environments and affective processes largely as separate domains, few conceptual frameworks theorize their systematic integration within teacher education. Addressing this gap, this conceptual paper advances the notion of aesthetic pedagogy as emotional architecture, proposing it as a unifying construct that explains how designed learning environments function as affective, cognitive, and identity-shaping structures in Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) classrooms.
Drawing on environmental psychology (Evans, 2006; Barrett et al., 2015), aesthetic education (Eisner, 2002; Greene, 1995), sociocultural theory (Vygotsky, 1978), affective neuroscience (Immordino-Yang & Damasio, 2007), and teacher identity research (Beauchamp & Thomas, 2009), the paper develops a five-dimensional conceptual framework comprising spatial aesthetics, visual culture, multimodal creative practice, emotional climate, and professional identity formation. The framework theorizes emotional climate as a mediating mechanism linking aesthetic design and pedagogical practice to the formation of professional dispositions. By conceptualizing aesthetic pedagogy as a foundational emotional infrastructure rather than a decorative enhancement, the paper contributes a theoretically generative model for understanding how teacher education environments sustain emotion, meaning-making, and identity development. Implications are discussed for curriculum design, institutional policy, and future empirical research in teacher education.

Keywords

aesthetic pedagogy; emotional architecture; teacher education

Downloads

References

1. Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2015). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Evans, G. W. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 423–451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Flores, M., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts that shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gaines, R. E., & Chang, M.-L. (2025). Teachers’ emotional appraisals and the reframing of student change in post-pandemic schools. Frontiers in Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts, and Social Change. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Küller, R., Mikellides, B., & Janssens, J. (2009). Color, arousal, and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 76–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ma, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, L. (2024). Emotional tensions in identity transition from teachers to teacher educators: voices from early-career teacher educators. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sinner, A., Leggo, C., Irwin, R., Gouzouasis, P., & Grauer, K. (2006). Arts-based educational research. The International Journal of Education & the Arts, 7(5), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Steele, C. (2010). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tao, J., Xu, Y., Wang, S., & Gao, X. (2025). The emotions of language teachers: A systematic review of studies between 2015 and 2024. Language Teaching. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., & Fiorito, E. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Wulandari, D. (2025). Exploring novice teachers’ emotions in post-pandemic digital classrooms. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles