An Assessment of the Effects of Screen Time on Children’s Academic Performance: A Case Study of Lusaka, Woodlands
Authors
The University of Zambia (Zambia)
The University of Zambia (Zambia)
Unesp - São Paulo State University (Zambia)
The University of Zambia (Zambia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1310000096
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 1248-1258
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-18
Accepted: 2026-10-23
Published: 2026-11-02
Abstract
Excessive screen time is increasingly linked to adverse developmental outcomes in children, yet its specific impact on academic performance remains nuanced. This study assessed the effects of electronic screen exposure on children’s academic performance from the parental perspective in Lusaka, Zambia. A quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized. Data were collected via structured questionnaires from 121 randomly sampled parents (N = 121) and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The results indicated that 74% (n = 89) of parents perceived screen time as having a negative effect on academic performance. Descriptive cross-tabulations showed that performance declines were higher among children spending >4 hours daily on screens (48%) compared to those spending <1 hour (19%). However, a Pearson chi-square test revealed that total daily screen duration was not statistically significantly associated with academic performance, χ² (6) = 11.034, p = .087. Conversely, screen activity type demonstrated a statistically significant association, χ² (2) = 7.102, p = .029. Children engaging in educational screen activities were significantly more likely to show academic improvement (53%) than those without educational screen engagement (28%). While parental perceptions remain largely negative regarding screen duration, total daily usage time alone does not drive academic outcomes; rather, content quality and educational purpose are critical determinants. Interventions should prioritize promoting purposeful, educational technology integration alongside active parental oversight over rigid duration restrictions.
Keywords
Academic Performance, Children, Digital Literacy, Educational Content, Parental Perception, Screen Time, Zambia.
Downloads
References
1. American Psychological Association (2025). Screen time and emotional problems in kids: A vicious circle? Available at: Accessed: 11 March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Children’s Health of Orange County (CHOC) (2024). ‘The effects of screen time on children: The latest research parents should know’. Available at https://health.choc.org/the-effects-of-screen-time-on-children-the-latest-research-parents-should-know/? Accessed: 12 March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods procedures. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 31(3), 75-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (Vol. 5). London: sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gupta, P. et al. (2023). ‘Impact of excessive screen time on children’, Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences. Available at: Accessed: 12 March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Health Service Executive (2024). Screen time and young children. Available at: Accessed: 11 th March, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Karani, N.F. et al. (2022). ‘The influence of screen time on children’s language development: A scoping review’. Available at: Accessed: 11th March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Le Roux, D. and Feldman, J. (2025). Smartphone use and habits among South African adolescents: Patterns of ownership, usage, and parental regulation. Stellenbosch University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/KVXHD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. McCombes, S. (2023). Sampling methods| Types, techniques & examples. Retrieved from Scribbr: https://www. scribbr. com/methodology/sampling-methods. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. MedlinePlus (2025). Screen time and children. Available at: Accessed: 29th March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Ministry of Technology and Science Zambia (2025). Strengthening digital safety for every child: Official launch of the National Child Online Protection Strategy (2025–2029). Available at: Accessed: 20th March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mori, Y., Silwal, S., Wan Mohd Yunus, W. M. A., & Sourander, A. (2026). Long-Term Trends in Screen Time Use Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review Including Pre-and Post-COVID Periods. Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 13591045261432532. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Notte, M. and Renzi, D. (2026). ‘Children in front of a screen: What is the impact of technology on their development?’, In-Mind, 69. Available at: https://in-mind.org/article/children-in-front-of-a-screen-what-is-the-impact-of-technology-on-their-development Accessed: 20th March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Saunders, N. K. M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. Synthese (8th ed., pp. 1–867). Pearson. www. pearson. com/uk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011-1013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Shaleha, R., Roque, N., Andrews, H., Calfee, K., & Lee, S. (2026). Screen use measurement tools: A mapping of instruments, gaps, and future directions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 29(3), 140-150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Wachira, R.N. (2022) Relationship between screen time usage and academic performance among school going children from Regis School Runda in Nairobi, Kenya. Available at https://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/xmlui/handle/11732/7467 Accessed: 20th August, 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Zambian Business Times (2022). ‘ICTAZ’. Available at: Accessed: 20th March 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Zulu, G. and Tembo, S. (2020). ‘An assessment of child online risks and effects in Zambia: A remedy for child online protection’, International Journal of Information Science, 10(1), pp. 1–8I DOI: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. 5923/j.ijis.20201001.01. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (Vol. 5). London: sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fowler Jr, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. McCombes, S. (2023). Sampling methods| Types, techniques & examples. Retrieved from Scribbr: https://www. scribbr. com/methodology/sampling-methods. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Saunders, N. K. M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. Synthese (8th ed., pp. 1–867). Pearson. www. pearson. com/uk. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study