Artificial Intelligence and Fraud Detection: An Empirical Study of Selected Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

Authors

Akinnifesi Adesina ORCID icon for Akinnifesi Adesina

Lagos State Co-operative College, Agege, Lagos (Nigeria)

Adesope Ayinla Akinniku

Lagos State Co-operative College, Agege, Lagos (Nigeria)

Paul Chukwuma Uwajeh

Lagos State University Ojo, Lagos (Nigeria)

Temidayo Dorcas Orimoloye

Lagos State Co-operative College, Agege, Lagos (Nigeria)

Ajiboye Aisha

Lagos State Co-operative College, Agege, Lagos (Nigeria)

Muhammed Olusola Iberu

Lagos State University Ojo, Lagos (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000184

Subject Category: Banking and Finance

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3150-3169

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-24

Accepted: 2026-08-29

Published: 2026-09-14

Abstract

This research investigated how Computer Vision (CV) and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) influence fraud detection capabilities in five quoted Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) in Nigeria between 2020 and 2026. The study was anchored on the Fraud Triangle Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and adopted a descriptive survey and correlational design. Primary data were gathered from 88 personnel drawn from Information Technology, Risk Management and Internal Control units, while secondary data on fraud losses were extracted from the publications of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) and Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics and panel random-effects regression. Results indicated substantial adoption of CV (Grand Mean = 3.81) and moderate adoption of RPA (Grand Mean = 3.51). CV exerts a significant positive influence on fraud detection rate (β = 0.341, p < 0.01), whereas RPA significantly lowers fraud response time (β = -0.298, p < 0.01). Both CV (β = -0.213, p < 0.01) and RPA (β = -0.189, p < 0.05) significantly curtail fraud losses, explaining 63.1% of the variation (R² = 0.631). Major constraints include low-quality document images and regulatory restrictions on automated decision-making. The paper recommends expanding CV to cheque and mandate verification, deploying RPA for real-time preventive controls, and establishing a CBN-supervised sandbox for automated fraud actions.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision, Robotic Process Automation, Fraud Detection, Deposit Money Banks, Fraud Triangle Theory

Downloads

References

1. Adebayo, O., & Ige, O. (2022). Automating card fraud detection: Insights from robotic process automation in banking. Journal of Financial Crime Prevention, 5(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebisi, O., Okonji, N., Adeeyo, O., &Ezebuiro, P. (2023). Barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in Nigerian banking sector. International Journal of Banking and Finance, 11(3), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adeleke, A., & Amusa, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence and operational efficiency in financial services. African Journal of Business Management, 15(4), 98–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adeoye, T., &Elegbede, S. (2022). Risk management strategies and artificial intelligence in banking. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(2), 78–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Adewumi, A., &Akinyelu, A. (2017). A model for fraud detection in banking using artificial intelligence. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(5), 231–237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmed, S., Yusuf, M., & Bello, A. (2021). Insider fraud in financial institutions: Causes and prevention. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 512–525. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Akinyemi, T., & Adebayo, F. (2021). Artificial intelligence: Concepts and applications in finance. International Journal of Computer Applications, 183(12), 20–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chukwuma, N., &Okwuosa, I. (2021). Evaluating the impact of robotics on card fraud prevention in financial services. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology, 5(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Deloitte. (2022). Automation in financial crime prevention: The case for intelligent automation. Deloitte Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Eke, C., & Osuji, C. (2021). Security measures and fraud detection in Nigerian deposit money banks. International Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 7(4), 89–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ezeoha, A., & Nwosu, C. (2024). Adoption of computer vision in Nigerian tier-1 banks: Progress and challenges. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics, 15(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Falana, B., Ojo, T., & Akinola, S. (2021). Challenges of AI implementation in emerging economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Technology in Society, 67, 101742. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nwankwo, C., & Eze, U. (2021). Role of artificial intelligence and computer vision in minimising insider fraud in Nigerian banks. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 15–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Okwudire, A., & Afolabi, O. (2022). Effectiveness of computer vision technology in detecting internal fraud within financial institutions. Journal of Forensic Accounting and Fraud Investigation, 7(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles