Artificial Intelligence and the Re-definition of Creativity: Rethinking Authorship and Aesthetic Value in Contemporary Art

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has significantly transformed contemporary artistic practices, raising critical questions about creativity, authorship, and aesthetic value. This paper examines how generative AI systems challenge traditional human-centered models of artistic creation that have long shaped art theory and aesthetics. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from art history, philosophy of art, and digital humanities, the study explores the shifting boundaries between human agency and machine participation in the creative process. It argues that artificial intelligence should not be understood merely as a technical instrument but as a co-creative agent that reconfigures established notions of originality, intentionality, and artistic labor.
Through a critical analysis of selected AI-generated artworks, digital exhibitions, and contemporary theoretical debates, the paper investigates how meaning and value are negotiated in works produced through human–machine collaboration. Particular attention is given to emerging questions of authorship, intellectual ownership, and the evolving role of the artist in an era of algorithmic creativity. The discussion further situates AI-driven art within broader cultural and ethical frameworks, addressing concerns related to transparency, algorithmic bias, and the commodification of creativity in digital economies.
By proposing a revised conceptual framework for understanding creativity in the age of artificial intelligence, this study contributes to ongoing debates in contemporary aesthetics and digital art studies. The findings suggest that rather than diminishing human creativity, AI expands the creative field by enabling new aesthetic practices, critical interpretations, and modes of artistic engagement. This research offers valuable insights for scholars in the arts and humanities and provides a foundation for future interdisciplinary inquiry into the cultural implications of artificial intelligence in artistic production.

Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Authorship, Aesthetics, Digital Art, Human–Machine Collaboration

1. Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its nature and future. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Boden, M. A. (2022). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 304, 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103667 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence, responsibility attribution, and a relational justification of explainability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2051–2068. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Elgammal, A., Liu, B., Elhoseiny, M., & Mazzone, M. (2017). CAN: Creative adversarial networks. Proceedings of ICCC, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Floridi, L. (2019). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261–262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Manovich, L. (2019). AI aesthetics. Strelka Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. McCormack, J., Gifford, T., Hutchings, P., et al. (2019). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer-generated art. Journal of Creative Music Systems, 3(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Murray, J. (2017). Hamlet on the Holodeck (Updated ed.). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nake, F. (2020). Art in the age of machine learning. Arts, 9(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Paul, C. (2016). Digital art (3rd ed.). Thames & Hudson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rainey, S., Erden, Y. J., & Santoni de Sio, F. (2021). The ethical use of artificial intelligence in the arts. AI & Society, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Shanken, E. A. (2018). Art and electronic media. Phaidon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zylinska, J. (2020). AI art: Machine visions and warped dreams. Open Humanities Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Psychoanalytical Study of the Gift of Magi
• Analyzing Community Initiatives and Government Interventions in Salt Farming Resource Management in Pangkajene and Kepulauan Districts
• Diaconal Ministries and the Ordination of Women
• Socio Economic Changes in Sagar Island before and After Cyclone Aila
• Grief and Its Transformations in Joan Didion’s the Year of Magical Thinking