Assessment of Manpower, Equipment and Material Resources Adequacy for the Provision of Basic Obstetric Ultrasound Services in PHC Facilities in Rivers State, Nigeria
Authors
Rivers State Primary Health Care Management Board, Port Harcourt 500001, Rivers State (Nigeria)
Rivers State Primary Health Care Management Board, Port Harcourt 500001, Rivers State (Nigeria)
Rivers State Primary Health Care Management Board, Port Harcourt 500001, Rivers State; Environmental Health Department, School of Public Health, University of Port-Harcourt, Choba 500004, Rivers State (Nigeria)
Rivers State Primary Health Care Management Board, Port Harcourt 500001, Rivers State (Nigeria)
Rivers State Primary Health Care Management Board, Port Harcourt 500001, Rivers State (Nigeria)
3Rivers State Ministry of Health, Port Harcourt 500001, Rivers State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1315PH00044
Subject Category: Public Health
Volume/Issue: 13/15 | Page No: 1767-1778
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-10
Accepted: 2026-03-16
Published: 2026-03-31
Abstract
Background and aim: The World Health Organization (WHO) advocates for a world where every pregnant woman and newborn receives quality care throughout pregnancy, childbirth, and postnatal periods. This study was thus aimed at assessing the manpower, equipment and material resources adequacy for providing Basic Obstetric Imaging Services (BOIS) services, in primary healthcare facilities in Rivers State, Nigeria.
Materials and methods: This study utilized the descriptive, cross-sectional design and was conducted in 83 PHC facilities in Rivers State, Nigeria, where the heads of facility provided responses on the availability of manpower, equipment and material resources necessary for the provision of BOIS services. Data was collected using adapted manpower, equipment and materials checklists, after which evaluation was done using laid down PHC standards to identify the adequacy of the assessed resources. Data analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 and was presented on tables and charts.
Results: Regarding the manpower, it was identified that the largest proportion of the facilities had one doctor 45 (47.4%), one nurse 27 (28.4%), one community health officer (CHO) 32 (33.7%), three community health extension workers (CHEW) 22 (23.2%), and one records officer 39 (41.1%) working in the facilities. About 38 (40.0%), 22 (23.2%), 28 (29.5%), 2 (2.1%), and 7 (7.4%) of the facilities did not have any doctor, nurse, CHO, CHEW, nor records officer respectively. Assessing the adequacy of the various cadres of workers using the national minimum standard requirements for manpower at PHC facilities, revealed inadequacies affecting all cadres, with nurses (76%) and doctors (40%) having the highest proportion of inadequacies. An assessment of the adequacy of the equipment and materials using a 50% cut-off for categorization of availability into “adequate” and “inadequate” showed that most facilities 72 (76.0%) experienced inadequacies as they did not have a number of these equipment and materials.
Conclusion and recommendation: The manpower, equipment and material resources necessary for BOIS provision in PHC facilities in Rivers State was found to be inadequate. It was recommended that PHC facilities in the State be strengthened with all resources for the effective provision of BOIS services to the populace.
Keywords
Obstetric Ultrasound, equipment
Downloads
References
1. Woko CN, Essi ID, Wegbom Ai. Estimating The Predictors Of Maternal Mortality In A Southern State Of Nigeria Using Logistic Regression Model. African J Math Stat Stud 2021; 4: 79–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Kruse C, Betancourt J, Ortiz S, et al. Barriers to the use of mobile health in improving health outcomes in developing countries: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e13263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Olamijulo J, Olorunfemi G, Osman H, et al. 44‑Year Temporal Trends and Causes of Maternal Mortality at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, LUTH, Lagos, Nigeria (1976‑2019). J Clin Pract 2023; 26: 1273–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chinwah V, Nyame-Asiamah F, Ekanem I. Risk factors affecting maternal health outcomes in Rivers State of Nigeria: Towards the PRISMA model. 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Alexander DA, Northcross A, Karrison T, et al. Pregnancy outcomes and ethanol cook stove intervention: A randomized-controlled trial in Ibadan, Nigeria. Environ Int 2018; 111: 152–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Tunçalp Ӧ., Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, et al. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. Bjog,. BJOG 2017; 124: 860–862. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Holmlund S, Ntaganira J, Edvardsson K, et al. Improved maternity care if midwives learn to perform ultrasound: a qualitative study of Rwandan midwives’ experiences and views of obstetric imaging. Glob Health Action 2017; 10: 1350451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. World Health Organization W, United States Agency for International Development U. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience: Summary. Highlights and Key Messages from the World Health Organization ’ s 2016 Global Recommendations for Routine Antenatal Care. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-19.5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. [de Masi S, Bucagu M, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Integrated person-centred health care for all women during pregnancy: Implementing World Health Organization recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Glob Heal Sci Pract 2017; 5: 197–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Roro MA, Aredo AD, Kebede T, et al. Enablers and barriers to introduction of obstetrics ultrasound service at primary care facilities in a resource-limited setting: a qualitative study in four regions of Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22: 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ghi T, Eggebo T, Lees C, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum Ultrasound. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 2018; 52: 128–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Shah S, Bellows BA, Adedipe AA, et al. Perceived barriers in the use of ultrasound in developing countries. Crit Ultrasound J 2015; 7: 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Nathan RO, Swanson JO, Swanson DL, et al. Evaluation of focused obstetric imaging examinations by health care personnel in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017; 46: 210–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mubuuke AG, Erem G, Nassanga R, et al. Point of care obstetric ultrasound training for midwives and nurses: implementation and experiences of trainees at a rural based hospital in Sub-saharan Africa: a qualitative study. BMC Res Notes 2023; 16: 287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Luntsi G, Ugwu AC, Ohagwu CC, et al. Impact of ultrasound scanning on pregnant Women’s compliance with attendance at antenatal care visits and supervised delivery at primary healthcare centres in northern Nigeria: Initial experiences. Radiography 2022; 28: 480–486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Noguchi L, Bucagu M, Tunçalp Ö. Strengthening antenatal care services for all: implementing imaging ultrasound before 24 weeks of pregnancy. BMJ Glob Heal 2023; 8: e011170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. National Primary Health Care Development Agency. Minimum standards for Primary Health Care in Nigeria. 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ibrahim Ha. Inadequate Human Resources And Their Effect On The Service Delivery Of Adamawa State Primary Health Care Development Agency. Ayden International Journal of Law, Political Science, and Administration. 2024 Sep 20;12(3):1-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Okunlola KA, Oreofe I, Ohaeri B, Babarimisa O. Challenges facing primary health care services utilization and possible solutions. Euro Global Contemporary Studies Journal (EGCSJ). 2025;5(2):1-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Pholpark, A., Mon, H. M., Lim, L. T., Tsilaajav, T., de Oliveira Cruz, V., & Hanvoravongchai, P. (2025). Challenging inadequate and fragmented primary health care financing: findings from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Maldives, and Nepal. The Lancet Regional Health-Southeast Asia, 38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Awoyesuku P., MacPepple D., Altraide BO. Magnitude , Trends and Causes of Maternal Mortality: A 7-year Review at a Tertiary Hospital in Rivers State, Nigeria. J Adv Med Med Res 2020; 32: 103–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. [Tefera M, Mezmur H, Jemal M, et al. Health professionals ’ perspectives on the role of obstetric ultrasonography in maternity care in rural eastern Ethiopia: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ Open 2024; 14: e075263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Tribal Child Nutrition and Health in District of Sundargarh: A Public Health Review of ICDS Intervention
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Towards Prostate Cancer Screening Amongst Men Aged 40-60 Years in The Buea Health District: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Compliance with JCI Protocols: A Focus on Employee Safety
- Influence and Involvement of Teachers in Menstrual Hygiene Management of Female Secondary School Students in Kogi State, Nigeria
- A Critical Evaluation of Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana in Bihar