Authorship Patterns in Lifelong Learning Literature Emanating from Asia during 2000–2024: A Twofold Bibliometric and Data-Analytical Approach

Authors

Amarul Shaikh

Department of Lifelong Learning & Extension, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal (India)

Tirtharaj Dasgupta

Department of Lifelong Learning & Extension, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal (India)

Subrata Biswas

Department of Lifelong Learning & Extension, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal (India)

Prasenjit Deb

Department of Lifelong Learning & Extension, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, West Bengal (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000416

Subject Category: Information Technology

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 5705-5715

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-08

Accepted: 2026-08-14

Published: 2026-08-22

Abstract

Background: Lifelong learning is an established field because of its importance in supporting continuing education, career advancement, and societal progress. Examining authorship patterns can reveal temporal, institutional, national, and gender-related dimensions of research development.
Objective: This study analyzes authorship patterns in English-language journal articles on Lifelong Learning emanating from Asia during 2000–2024, focusing on annual scientific production, average citation count per year, author productivity, author-productivity distribution in relation to Lotka’s law, affiliation output, Single Country Publications (SCP), Multiple Country Publications (MCP), citation counts, and name-based gender classification by author position.
Methods: Bibliographic records were retrieved from OpenAlex in June 2026 using the search string “lifelong learning”. Eligibility was restricted to English-language journal articles published during 2000–2024 and meeting the Asian geographical criterion. The retrieval yielded 3,103 records, downloaded in CSV format. Analysis used Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny for bibliometric indicators and OpenRefine with Genderize.io for data wrangling and name-based gender classification. Bibliometrix loaded 3,099 records (99.817%).
Results: Annual scientific production generally increased, whereas average citation counts varied across years. Marjaan Laal was the most prolific author with 11 documents. Of 7,292 authors represented in the author-productivity distribution, 6,703 (91.92%) contributed one document, broadly consistent with the pattern predicted by Lotka’s law. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia led affiliation output with 123 articles. China recorded the highest SCP (558) and MCP (41), whereas Turkey had the highest citation count (1,721), followed by China (1,312). Of 7,491 names queried through Genderize.io, 421 returned null values; 4,038 (53.91%) were classified as male and 3,032 (40.47%) as female.
Conclusion: The study provides a quantitative baseline of Lifelong Learning scholarship in Asia, integrating production, citation accumulation, author productivity, institutional and national contributions, and name-based gender classification. Despite metadata limitations, findings can inform decisions. Future research should compare databases, test Lotka’s law, examine collaboration and thematic change, and develop reproducible workflows.

Keywords

Authorship pattern; Bibliometric analysis; Gender analysis; Lifelong learning

Downloads

References

1. Ashour, S. (2020). Quality higher education is the foundation of a knowledge society: Where does the UAE stand? Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1769263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bapte, V. D., Gedam, J. S., & Bejalwar, S. (2024). Authorship pattern and authorship productivity in library and information science literature. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 71(02), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v71i2.7129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Jarvis, P. (2024). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003540892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kirtania, D. K. (2023). Bibliometric study of authorship pattern literature. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4398603 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mishra, M., Desul, S., Santos, C. A. G., Mishra, S. K., Kamal, A. H. M., Goswami, S., Kalumba, A. M., Biswal, R., Da Silva, R. M., Dos Santos, C. A. C., & Baral, K. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of sustainable development goals (SDGs): A review of progress, challenges, and opportunities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(5), 11101–11143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03225-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, and institutions. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Thwe, W. P., & Kálmán, A. (2024). Lifelong learning in the educational setting: A systematic literature review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00738-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Verma, M., & Rajiv, P. (2021). Study of Lotka’s law and authorship pattern in the conference proceedings of COLLNET: An international conference covering exclusively bibliometric study. Journal of Ravishankar University (PART-A), 26(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52228/JRUA.2020-26-1-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles