Autonomy Deprivation, Villain Appeal, and Aspirational Brand Identification in Overchoice Environments

Authors

Chirag Jain

Noida, Uttar Pradesh (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000230

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 3172-3177

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-16

Accepted: 2026-07-22

Published: 2026-08-08

Abstract

This study investigates whether autonomy deprivation resulting from overchoice environments predicts individuals' attraction to morally decisive fictional antagonists and unconventional brand personalities. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory, the Paradox of Choice, media psychology, and consumer behaviour literature, the study proposes that excessive choice reduces individuals' sense of autonomy, increasing their preference for characters and brands that project certainty and decisiveness. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining a thematic review of peer-reviewed literature with a small-scale anonymous survey conducted through Google Forms. The findings indicate that respondents who experienced greater choice overload also reported stronger attraction toward decisive fictional villains and brands with bold, distinctive identities. The results suggest that decisiveness may serve as a psychological substitute for diminished autonomy in environments characterised by excessive choice. The study contributes to the literature by integrating three previously disconnected research areas and proposes a unified framework linking decision environments, psychological needs, media preferences, and consumer behaviour. Although limited by a small sample size and self-reported data, the findings provide a foundation for future empirical research examining how autonomy influences both entertainment preferences and marketplace behaviour.

Keywords

Overchoice, Autonomy Deprivation, Self-Determination Theory, Paradox of Choice

Downloads

References

1. Chernev, A., Böckenholt, U., & Goodman, J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333–358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dean, M., Stoye, J., & Ravindran, D. (2024). Reconsidering the evidence for choice overload. [Working paper]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dodoo, N. A. (2018). Why consumers like Facebook brands: The role of aspirational brand personality in consumer behavior. Journal of Promotion Management, 24(1), 103–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J., Fiskaali, A., Høgh-Olesen, H., Johnson, J. A., Smith, M., & Clasen, M. (2020). Do dark personalities prefer dark characters? A personality psychological approach to positive engagement with fictional villainy. Poetics, 79, 101422. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kneer, J. (2025). Superheroes and villains: Engagement, effects, and empowerment. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Raimondo, M. A. (2022). Consumers' identity signalling and dissociative desire. Psychology & Marketing, 39(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Reutskaja, E., Cheek, N. N., Iyengar, S., & Schwartz, B. (2022). Choice deprivation, choice overload, and satisfaction with choices across six nations. Journal of International Marketing, 30(3), 18–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Schwartz, B., & Ward, A. (2004). Doing better but feeling worse: The paradox of choice. In Positive Psychology in Practice (pp. 86–104). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Shang, Z., Tao, T., & Wang, L. (2016). Autonomy deprivation decreases the mere choice effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Yang, Y., et al. (2024). Villainous characters in film-induced tourism: Charismatic leadership and justice sensitivity. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles