Beyond Ownership: Land, Intra-Household Control and Women's Economic Agency: A Study of Naduvannur Village in Kerala

Authors

Dr. Ann Mary Chacko ORCID icon for Dr. Ann Mary Chacko

Assistant Professor (On contract), PG & Research Department of Economics, St. Joseph's College Devagiri(Autonomous) , Kozhikode, Kerala (India)

Ms. Anita Grace Gopurathingal

PhD Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Christ (deemed to be) University, Bengaluru, Karnataka (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000025

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 292-302

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-11

Accepted: 2026-08-16

Published: 2026-08-27

Abstract

Women's economic empowerment is often assessed through asset ownership, but reported ownership does not necessarily imply effective control or legally documented title. This study examines whether reported land ownership translates into substantive economic agency among women in Naduvannur Village, Kerala. Using respondent-level survey data from 450 respondents, the study analyses the relationship between land-acquisition pathways, reported ownership form and women's decision-making authority over major household assets. The empirical analysis combines descriptive statistics, a chi-square test, non-parametric comparisons and binary logistic regression with robust standard errors. In the reference parcel, joint ownership with family is the most common category (54.2%), while 32.9% is reported as sole ownership. Inheritance is the dominant acquisition pathway (67.3%), and sole ownership is more common among inherited parcels (39.6%) than purchased parcels (13.8%). The association between acquisition mode and sole ownership is statistically significant (χ² = 28.34, p < 0.001). In the logistic model, purchased reference parcels have significantly lower odds of sole reported ownership than inherited parcels (OR = 0.279, 95% CI: 0.159–0.489, p < 0.001), conditional on total land size, recorded land value and government transfer. The broader survey further shows that women constitute 28% of individual land owners but only 12% of individual reported decision-makers in land sales. The findings support a distinction between formal ownership and substantive economic agency and suggest that women's empowerment policies should strengthen not only asset ownership but also documented rights, control and decision-making power.

Keywords

women's economic empowerment; land ownership; property rights; intra-household bargaining; economic agency.

Downloads

References

1. Abraham, D. T., & Neetha, N. (2024). Expanding women's land rights: Can MGNREGA help? Journal of Asian and African Studies, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249231213151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one's own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Agarwal, B. (1997). 'Bargaining' and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agarwal, B., Anthwal, P., & Mahesh, M. (2021). How many and which women own land in India? Inter-gender and intra-gender gaps. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(11), 1807–1829. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1887478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Allendorf, K. (2007). Do women's land rights promote empowerment and child health in Nepal? World Development, 35(11), 1975–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ansary, A., & Ramya, R. (2024). Property ownership of women in contemporary India: An assessment of NFHS-V report. South India Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.62656/SIJSS.v22i3.740 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bhattacharyya, M., Bedi, A. S., & Chhachhi, A. (2011). Marital violence and women's employment and property status: Evidence from North Indian villages. World Development, 39(9), 1676–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Deere, C. D., & León, M. (2003). The gender asset gap: Land in Latin America. World Development, 31(6), 925–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00046-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deininger, K., Goyal, A., & Nagarajan, H. (2013). Women's inheritance rights and intergenerational transmission of resources in India. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.1.114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Government of India. (2005). The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. India Code. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Government of Kerala, Local Self Government Department. (2021). PMAY(U)-LIFE project ensuring women's participation and women empowerment. Government of Kerala. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Grover, M., & Sharma, A. (2026). Women's inheritance rights reforms and impact on women's empowerment: Evidence from India. Review of Economics of the Household, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-025-09784-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Heath, R., & Tan, X. (2020). Intrahousehold bargaining, female autonomy, and labor supply: Theory and evidence from India. Journal of the European Economic Association, 18(4), 1928–1968. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvz026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kodoth, P. (2001). Gender, family and property rights: Questions from Kerala's land reforms. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/097152150100800209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kudumbashree Mission, Government of Kerala. (n.d.). Microfinance, gender and organisation strengthening programmes. Government of Kerala. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kumar, S., Patel, R., & Chauhan, S. (2020). Does land possession among working women empower them and improve their child health: A study based on National Family Health Survey-4. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lekha, N. B. (2023). Gender bargaining within matriliny in Kerala. South Asia Research, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280221141046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Malarchitra, K. R., & Sasirekha, P. (2025). Women's land ownership in India: The impact of caste and religion. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249241295823 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C., & Theis, S. (2019). Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence. Agricultural Systems, 172, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Panda, P., & Agarwal, B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women's property status in India. World Development, 33(5), 823–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.01.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Roy, S. (2015). Empowering women? Inheritance rights, female education and dowry payments in India. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.12.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Suteau, M. (2025). Inheritance and women's empowerment: The heterogeneous effect of property rights. Review of Economics of the Household. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-025-09820-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Swaminathan, H., Suchitra, J. Y., & Lahoti, R. (2012). Individual property rights and bargaining outcomes: Evidence from intra-household asset data. Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Working Paper No. 364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. World Bank. (2022). Women, business and the law 2022. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. World Bank. (2023). How did India successfully reform women's rights? Part I: Answers from the movement on equal inheritance rights. Global Indicators Brief No. 19. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Bank. (2024). Women, business and the law 2024. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles