Breaking the Barriers: Exploring the Deterrents of Quality Elementary Education

This descriptive- qualitative research was conducted with the aim of identifying the key barriers that hinder learners from accessing and attaining effective education. Purposive sampling was employed to select the participants from public elementary schools located in a geographically challenged area. Data were gathered through interviews and were analyzed through thematic analysis to extract recurring patterns and significant insights. Findings revealed that deterrents to quality elementary education include textbook shortage, low Socio-economic Status (SES), low parental education, learners’ negative attitude towards studies, and school location issues. Actions taken to overcome such deterrents include resorting to digital mobilization, engaging in sideline jobs, creating engaging learning experiences, building strong support systems, engaging in self-care practices, and practicing positive thinking, resourcefulness, adaptability, and resilience. The study concludes that these deterrents are interconnected and require comprehensive, multi- stakeholder interventions to promote inclusive and quality education. Hence, a Strategic Intervention Program is proposed to mitigate, if not eradicate, the identified deterrents and promote a more inclusive, equitable, and high-quality public elementary education system.

Challenges, textbook shortage, socio- economic status, parental education, student behavior, school accessibility

1. Ahmed, M., Abdalmotalib, M.M., & Mohamed, E. (2018). Analysis of the problems of primary system in Pakistan: Critical review of literature. Academic Research International, 4(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02958-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Appiah, A. K. (2024). The multiculturalist misunderstanding. The New York Review of Books, 44(15), 30-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 39- 62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barrett, P. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the Evidence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Barth, R. (1991). Improving schools from within: Teachers parents and principals can make the difference (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bashir, Z. (2017). The effectiveness of co- curricular activities on academic achievement. of secondary school students in District Abbottabad Pakistan. Journal of Social Sciences and Education 3(1), 44-49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bashiruddin, A., & Qayyum, R. (2015). Teachers English- language in Pakistan: Profile and recommendations. Journal of Critical Inquiry, 12(1), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bayani, D., & Torino, G. (2018).“ I endured the learning struggles”: The sentiments of senior high school students in modular distance learning. International Journal of Education, Development, 125(1), 887-903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Bayani, D., & Guhao, O. (2018). Out-of-Field teaching: experiences of non-Filipino majors. International Journal of Education, Development, 3, 111-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1996). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Bosede, A.F. (2010). Influence of sex and location on relationship between students problems and academic performance. The Social Science, 5(4), 340-345. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Braun, V., Clarke, V.,& Weate, P. (2016). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Brick, N. & Green, O. (2016). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. MSF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Brooks - Gunn, J., & Duncan, J. G. (2000). Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Development, 71(1), 188 - 196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Burleson, S. & Thoron, A. (2014). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and its relation to learning and achievement. University of Florida, Department of Agricultural Education and Communication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Cinkir, S., & Kurum, G. (2015). Discrepancy in teacher employment: The problem of out-of-field teacher employment. Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 14-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossy- Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Cohen, L., Manion, L.,& Marrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in education. Jossey- Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Considine, G., & Zappala, G. (2022). The Influence of Socio Economic Advantage on the academic performance of school students in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 11(7), 134-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.) SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research : Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Csizmadia, T. G. (2006). Quality management in Hungarian higher education. Organizational responses to governmental policy. CHEPS/UT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294-304. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Dela Cruz, C. (2021). “The influence of parental involvement and socioeconomic status on academic among special Science class students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Delve, H., & Limpaecher, A. (2021). A guide to collaborative qualitative analysis. Delve. https:// delvetool.com/blog/ collaborative equal analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Denzin N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The handbook of qualitative research(5th ed.) SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Drummond, K., & Stipek, D. (2019). Low income parent’s beliefs about their role in children‘s academic learning. Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 197-213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ebinum, S., & Akamagune, N. (2017). Effects of school proximity on students performance in Mathematics. International Journal of Advance Research, 6(2), 342- 347. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Elkind, D. (2004). A sympathetic understanding of the child birth to sixteen. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Emore, C. (2005). Causes of students’ lateness to school. In Ivwie, L. G. A. of Delta state. Abraka, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Engelhard, G. (2002). Attendance and academic achievement. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Engin - Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17-29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. West view Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Espina, R., Pinili, L., & Vergara, M. (2024). Impact of parental involvement and student behavior on academic achievement. Brazil Environmental Research, 200, 111499. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Fan, W., & Chen, M. (2021). Parental engagement in educational activities and student achievement: Ameta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 33,100379. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.10037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Franklin, S., & Smink, A. (2016). A strategic approach to dropout prevention. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Freire, G., Kalil, A., & Haskins, R. (2022). Parental support and its influence on academic outcomes during early childhood. Journal of Child Development, 93(5), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: Systems thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Gagnon, L. (2015). School location and teacher supply. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Gershoff, E., Ritchie. M., & Clements, J. (2020). The role of parental involvement in reducing disruptive behavior: A longitudinal study. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 1-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Gergen, K. J. (1995). The SAGE handbook of social research methodology. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing: A guide to learning and teaching methods, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. 38-55. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. González, A. R., Van de Vijver, F. J., & Damhuis, C. M. (2023). The impact of family and school involvement on student behavior and academic success. Educational Studies, 56(2), 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2023.199122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Gomez, M. (2019). Exploring the socio economics of the students. International Journal of Economics, 6(4), 56-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Hartline-Grafton, F., & Dean, L. (2017). The socio economic status of American people affecting education. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. (2020). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Learning and Instruction, 68, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.10124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). The impact of school family, and community connections on student achievement. South Educational Development Laboratory/America Institute for Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Hill, E., & Craft, SA. (2003). Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Jones, S., & Biddle, N. (2021). Parental engagement and its effects on student behavior: A study of primary school children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(4), 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025421991238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Kauts, M., & Kaur, A. (2016). Spiritual intelligence of teachers in relation to SES. Journal of Asian Review for Social Sciences, 2(4), 34-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Kean, P., & Pamela Q. (2021). The role of parent educational attainment in parenting and children’s development. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(4), 89-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Kincheole, J. L. (2005). Critical constructivism primer: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679-692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Kohl, G.O., Lengua, L.J., & McMahon, R.J. (2000). Parent involvement in school: Conceptualizing multiple dimensions and their relations with family and demographic risk factors. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 501–523. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(00)00050-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Konu, A., & Rimpela, M. (2002). Well - being in schools:a conceptual model. Health Promotion International, 17(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary Education (2nd ed). Rowan and Littlefield. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Li, F. F. (2023). A study on the use of and impact of the 2019 edition of chemistry textbooks in senior high school on teachers and students. Doctoral dissertation. Beijing Normal University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Mahmood, S., Fatima, Q., & Lod Zhi, H. (2022). Overcrowded classroom management strategies used by teachers and their challenges at primary school level in Pakistan. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(2), 935-949. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Mahon, G. (2016). Students’ Family Income and Educational Outcomes. Journal of Research in Education ,9(14), 456-459. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2005). Constructistivism theories. The Cambrigde Encyclopedia of Child Development. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to design and implementation. Jossey- Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2009). Risk factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age: Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 401-413. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9279-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Moyo, J. Z. (2015). A limited test of the English grammar awareness of first-year students. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(6), 166- 184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Nikolopoulo, K. (2022). The concepts of Inclusion- Exclusion Methodology: Examples & definition. Scribbr. https://www. scribbr.com/ methodology/inclusion-exclusion-criteria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Obayan, P. T. (2003). Realizing Nigerian millennium education dream. In O. Bamiasaiye, Nwazuoke and Okediran (Eds.). Ibadan. The UBE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II). Where all students can succeed. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Okorie, E.U. and Ezeh, D.N.(2016). Influence of gender and location on students’ achievement in chemical bonding. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,7(3), 309-318. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Onderi, H., & Makori, A. (2015). Examining the teaching and learning resources- related challenges facing small and medium- sized public secondary schools in Kenya. African Educational Research Journal, 2(15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Oredein, O. (2016). Effects of school variables on students academic performance in Calabar municipal area of Cross River State. Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Oriko, P., & Reche, L. ( 2012). Geographical challenges in education. African Educational Research Journal 2,(4) 411-413. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Oteir, I., & Al-Otaibi, A. (2022). The relationship between the socio- economic status [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. and student’s speaking anxiety: A study of Saudi EFL students. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 5(4), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.53894/jrssv5i4.1005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Oyebola, A. (2017). Impact of overcrowded classroom on academic performance of students in selected public secondary schools in surelere local government of Lagos State. International Journal Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 6(8), 1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism: In constructionism research reports and essays 1985-1990, 1-11. Ablex Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Parveen, N., Rubab, U., & Rahman, F. (2015). Exploring teachers’ Experiencies and practices in inclusive classrooms of model schools. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(4), 277-285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. PhilAtlas. (2016). Balasan, Iloilo Profile. PhilAtlas. https:www.philatlas.com. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Phillips, D. A., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2022). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9824. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Philippine Statistical Authority. (2022). Philippine Statistical Authority. https://psa.gov.ph. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Pratt, C. W., & Roberts, M. M. (2024). Psychiatric rehabilitation (3rd ed) . Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Raab, D. (2019). Writing and transpersonal psychology. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1-2), 69-90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Rashid, A., Khalid, M., & Manzaoor, A. (2020). Key issues in Pakistan multi-tiered education system. Annals of human and Social Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Raychaudhuri, A., Debnath, M., Sen, S., & Majumder, B. G. (2010). Factors affecting students‘ academic performance: A case study in Agartala Municipal Council Area. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 7(2): 34-41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Reardon, S. F. (2018). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Inequality in the 21st Century, 177-189. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499821-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Reddy, S. (2007). School quality: Perspectives from the developed and developing countries. Azimi Premiji Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Reiss, M., & Vaugh, S. (2019). Socioeconomic Status, stressful life situations and mental health problems in children and adolescents. Remedial and Special Education Journal, 20(3), 161-171. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Robinson, A., Greene, S., & Edwards, T. (2021). Parental involvement in children’s academic and behavioral development: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(7), 1509-1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-01989-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Rockwell, C. 2011. Factors affecting parental involvement with children’s education: A qualitative study of parent’s socioeconomic status, level of education, and parent school relationship. Perspectives (University of New Hampshire) 94-98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Saleem Q., Goshes, F., & Henks, R. (2020). Classroom management challenges. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Sano, J., Silva, A. A., & Ferreira M. (2022-2023). Relationship Between Socioeconomic Profile and Reading Comprehension Performance in English. Forum Linguistico [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Scharge, F. P., & Smink, J. (2001). Strategies to help Solve Our School Dropout Problem. Eye On Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Schwandt, T. 1994. The Foundation of social research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Allyn & Bacon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Shumox, L., & Lomax, R. (2001). Parental efficacy: Predictor of parenting behavior and adolescent outcomes. Parenting: Science and practice, 2(2), 127-150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socio-economic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417-45 https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307500341749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Son, J. W., & Diletti, J. (2017). What can we learn from textbook analysis?. Research Trends in International Comparative Studies in Mathematics Education, 3-32. Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

113. Thompson, A., & Webber, C. F. (2015). A behavior management strategy for students with challenging behavior. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

114. UNESCO. (2021). EFA Global monitoring report:The quality imperative. Scrip. Organizations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

115. UNESCO. (2021-2022). Global Education Monitoring Report. Education for All. Scrip. Organizations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

116. UNICEF. (2020). Defining quality:Working paper serious, education section, program division. A Paper presented at the International Working Group on Education Meeting, Italy. Scrip. Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

117. Von Glaserfeld, E. (2019). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and Learning. Falmer Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

118. Vygotsky, L.(1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

119. Wakefield, J. F. (2007). Textbook usage in the United States. The case of U.S. history. Online submission. Online Advance Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

120. Wang, M.T., and Degol, J. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Dev Perspect, 8(3):137-143. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12073. Epub 2014 Jun 17. PMID: 27087833; PMCID: PMC4833401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

121. World Bank. (2007). Education quality and economic growth. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

122. Wolf, Q., & Avornyo, L. (2022). Executive function mediates cumulative risk & learning in Ghana. Developmental Psychology: Comparative Education Review, 67(2), 189-214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

123. https://doi.org/10.1086/722802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

124. Wright, J., & Taylor, L. (2022). Student behavior and academic success: The role of self-regulation and collaboration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 713-729. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

125. Zeng, J. Y. (2016). A study on students’ use of textbooks under activity theory San angle. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

126. Doctoral dissertation East China Normal University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

127. Zickafoose, J. (2023). Quality education in Sub- Saharan Africa. SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study