Bridging the Capability Gap: Project Scope Definition Competencies and the Implementation Performance of Educational Infrastructure Projects in Kenya

The execution of decentralized social asset initiatives in developing market economies remains heavily constrained by capacity gaps within non-technical governance boards. This study evaluated the structural relationships between project scope definition competencies and the implementation performance of educational infrastructure projects funded under the Economic Stimulus Programme (ESP) in Kisumu County, Kenya. Utilizing a descriptive survey research design, data was retrieved from 106 institutional stakeholders, spanning school Boards of Management (BOM) and Project Management Committees (PMC). Inferential statistical models revealed a severe structural deficit: only 27.8% of the institutions utilized a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), and 54.55% of the respondents characterized the entire front-end scope definition process as inadequate. Cross-tabulation linked poor scope baseline formulation directly with construction delays, field coordination failures, and critical budget overruns. Pearson Chi-square analysis explicitly rejected the null hypothesis (χ² = 12.514, df = 2, p = 0.002), while Spearman’s rank correlation established a significant linear path (ρ = 0.340, p = 0.0001) linking scoping precision to successful asset delivery. Conversely, complexity and behavioral governance perspectives were introduced to challenge linear planning rigidities. The study recommended mandatory technical capacity audits and standardized scope validation protocols prior to capital asset funding disbursement.

Project Scope Definition, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

1. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA). World Development, 51, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bannister, J. (2021). Scope Definition and Cost Dynamics in Public Sector Management. Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cleland, D. I., & Gareis, R. (1994). Global Project Management Handbook. McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Crawford, L., Jari, K., & Moore, P. (2003). Role and competencies of non-technical stakeholders in decentralized public projects. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 261–270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Fageha, M. K., & Aibinu, A. A. (2014). Managing project scope definition to enhance project success in public building investments. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1418–1432. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gibson, G. E., Wang, Y. R., Cho, C. S., & Pappas, M. P. (2006). What is project front-end planning? Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(1), 35–44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gonzalez, R. (2021). Stakeholder engagement strategies and their direct impacts on municipal project scope clarity. International Journal of Project Management, 39(4), 412–425. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hajialiasghari, M. (2021). Quantitative analysis of scope management frameworks within public sector infrastructure. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(2), 114–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ika, L. A. (2020). Why public sector projects fail: Scoping deficits and cost overruns in international development. World Development, 128, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jiang, X. (2020). The fundamentals of requirements gathering and baseline control in public investments. Project Management Quarterly, 51(3), 89–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kotter, M. (2020). Evaluating the financial mitigations of change management frameworks in public initiatives. Journal of Change Management, 20(3), 245–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Le-Hoai, L., Lee, Y. D., & Lee, J. Y. (2008). Delay and cost overruns in Vietnam large construction projects: A comparison with other selected countries. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(6), 367–377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lewis, J. P. (2006). Fundamentals of Project Management (3rd ed.). American Management Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Li, Y. (2022). Correlation models between mid-execution scope alterations and financial performance in government infrastructure. Infrastructure Systems Review, 34(1), 56–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Love, P. E., Edwards, D. J., & Irani, Z. (2012). Moving beyond optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 567–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Macaulay, S. (2018). Non-contractual relations in business: A relational contracting perspective. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pinto, J. K., & Winch, G. (2022). The front-end of projects: Reviewing the state-of-the-art and charting a path forward. Project Management Journal, 53(2), 115–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance act as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Project Management Institute. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (5th ed.). Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Turner, J. R. (2019). The Handbook of Project-Based Management (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Wanyona, G. (2019). Structural challenges facing decentralized public infrastructure funding frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa. African Construction Review, 14(2), 88–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria