Cadaveric Dissection Model Usage in Teaching Anatomy among Clinical Medicine Students at Kenya Medical Training College

Authors

Felistus Nthambi Muinde

Kenya Medical Training College-Machakos Campus, Machakos County (Kenya)

Anastasiah Nyamilu Kimeu

Department of Health Systems Management and Development, Amref International University (AMIU), Nairobi County (Kenya)

Ronald Obwoge

Department of Community Health, Egerton University, Nakuru County (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000035

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 378-384

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-26

Accepted: 2026-05-02

Published: 2026-05-25

Abstract

Background: Cadaveric dissection remains central to anatomy education, offering tactile and spatial understanding that builds student confidence. While widely used globally, access to cadavers varies by resources and culture. In Africa, support for cadaveric dissection is strong despite the constraints. Emerging tools like VR and 3D models increasingly complement dissection, creating a balanced, hybrid approach to effective training.
Methods: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted among 260 students and 13 lecturers across multiple campuses. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analysed using SPSS version 30 for descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Qualitative data were obtained through key informant interviews and were analysed thematically.
Results: Most students (51.2%) reported participating in cadaveric dissection once per semester, although overall use was perceived as infrequent (78.1%). The majority (83.1%) considered cadaveric dissection very important for learning anatomy, citing benefits such as hands-on understanding, improved critical thinking, and enhanced knowledge retention. While awareness of alternative teaching methods was moderate, 53.8% of respondents preferred cadaveric dissection over these methods. Lecturers similarly reported limited but essential use of cadaveric dissection. Regression analysis showed a weak and non-significant relationship between study variables and participation in dissection (R²=0.048, p=0.084).
Conclusions: Cadaveric dissection is underutilised but remains a critical and preferred method for teaching anatomy. Expanding its use, improving infrastructure, and integrating complementary teaching methods may enhance the quality and effectiveness of anatomy education.

Keywords

cadaveric dissection; anatomy education

Downloads

References

1. Ajemba, M.N., Iroanya, C.J. and Ironegbu, C. (2024) ‘Comparative effectiveness of cadaveric dissection versus anatomical models in teaching anatomy: A global analysis focused on medical schools in low and middle –income Countries versus High-Income Countries: A systematic review’, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), pp. 1817–1832. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, M.K.A., Nurein, M.A. and MY Elmadhoun, W. (2025) ‘Perceptions of Medical Students Toward Cadaver Dissection in the Anatomy Course at Two African Universities’, Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences, 19(9), pp. 1–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20428/yjms.v19i9.3109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Asad, M.R. et al. (2023) ‘Medical Faculty Perspectives Toward Cadaveric Dissection as a Learning Tool for Anatomy Education: A Survey Study in India’, Cureus, 15(4), p. e37713. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37713. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asante, E.A. et al. (2021) ‘Perception and Attitude of Medical Students towards Cadaveric Dissection in Anatomical Science Education’, Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 31(4 SE-Articles). Available at: https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Koh, Z.J. et al. (2023) ‘A randomized trial comparing cadaveric dissection and examination of prosections as applied surgical anatomy teaching pedagogies’, Anatomical Sciences Education, 16(1), pp. 57–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Mahboobeh, K.M. et al. (2021) ‘Teaching professionalism in cadaver dissection: medical students’ perspective.’, Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 14(6), pp. 71–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v14i7.6751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Nnaka, J.A. et al. (2024) ‘Stress from Cadaver Dissection Linked to Learning Conditions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa’, medRxiv, 10(7), pp. 166–183. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Takoutsing, B.D. et al. (2023) ‘Assessing the impact of neurosurgery and neuroanatomy simulation using 3D non-cadaveric models amongst selected African medical students’, Frontiers in Medical Technology, 5(6), pp. 12–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1190096. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Theroux, L. et al. (2022) ‘A Goat Cadaver as a Cost-effective Resource for Teaching Emergency Medicine Procedures in Kijabe, Kenya’, Pediatric Emergency Care, 38(3), pp. e1097–e1103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Usman, M. et al. (2024) ‘Improving Anatomical Education in East Africa: Challenges and Prospects’, SSRN Solutions, 16(4), pp. 1–11. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4785945. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Verma, S. and Sharma, U. (2025) ‘Alternatives to Cadaveric Dissection in Medical Education: An Overview’, International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research, 12(1), pp. 254–233. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/iamr/fulltext/2025/01000/alternatives_to_cadaveric_dissection_in_medical.3.aspx. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles