Causes of Transient Oxygen Protection and Hydrogen-Induced Degradation in Api 5l X65 Steel

This article analyzes the electronic causes by which the oxygen–iron (O–Fe) interaction inhibits hydrogen (H₂) permeation in API 5L X65 steels, which are candidates for hydrogen transportation infrastructures. It is demonstrated that oxygen, due to its high electron affinity and the stability of its 2p orbitals, electronically dominates the iron surface.
Through a quantum-level analysis based on fundamental periodic properties, it is shown that O(2p)–Fe(3d) hybridization induces charge redistribution and a downward shift of the d-band center, weakening the Fe–H bond. This effect reduces hydrogen adsorption, dissociation, solubility, and permeation in the near-surface layers of the steel.
However, this inhibition is transient: the intrinsic properties of hydrogen—its small atomic size, high diffusivity, reducing character, and the action of high pressures—allow the progressive degradation of the oxidized layer, restoring permeation and promoting embrittlement mechanisms.
From a quantum perspective, hydrogen exploits the high electronic density of states near the Fermi level to stabilize Fe–H bonds and electronically displace oxygen. This interaction explains its high solubility in the metal and its ability to overcome the initial barrier imposed by oxygen. Understanding this behavior provides a conceptual basis for the rational design of hydrogen-resistant steels through alloying strategies, surface passivation, and control of operating conditions.

Hydrogen embrittlement, Oxygen passivation, Density of states (DOS), Fe–H bond weakening, API 5L X65 steel

1. Staykov, A., Yamabe, J., & Somerday, B. P. (2014).,Effect of hydrogen gas impurities on the hydrogen dissociation on iron surface.,Int. J. Quantum Chemistry, 114(10), 626–635., https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.24633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Staykov, A., Komoda, R., Kubota, M., & Watanabe, S. (2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Coadsorption of CO and H₂ on an iron surface and its implication on hydrogen embrittlement of iron.,The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 123(50), 30265–30273.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Zhang, N., Wada, K., Komoda, R., Staykov, A., & Kubota, M. (2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kinetic modeling of ammonia and hydrogen dissociative co-adsorption on iron surface and its effect on hydrogen embrittlement., Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 27, 24589–24600. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5CP02423D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Röthig, M., Hoschke, J., Chowdhury, M. F. W., Tapia-Bastidas, C. V., Venezuela, J., Gray, E., & Atrens, A. (2025).,Gaseous hydrogen permeation in X65 D pipeline steel and a preliminary evaluation of the influence of oxygen.,Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 158, 150459., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Sun, Y., & Cheng, F. (2024).,Dissociative adsorption of hydrogen molecules at Al₂O₃ inclusions in steels and its implications for gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of pipelines., Corrosion and Materials Degradation, 5(2), 200–223., https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd5020008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Youhan, U. K., & Koehler, S. P. K. (2021)., Energetics of hydrogen adsorption and diffusion for the main surface planes and all magnetic structures of γ-iron using DFT.,RSC Advances, 11, 28892–28897., https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA04999B [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Yifan Ye, James Thorne, Cheng Hao Wu., Yi-Sheng Liu., Chun Du., Ji-Wook Jang., Erik Liu., Dunwei Wang., Jinghua Guo., Strong O 2p-Fe 3d Hybridization Observed in Solution-Grown Hematite Films by Soft X-ray Spectroscopies.,J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 2, 927–932., https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06989 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mogamat A. Peck.; David Santos-Carballal; Nora H. de Leeuw; Michael Claeys., Density Functional Theory Study of the Adsorption of Oxygen and Hydrogen on 3d Transition Metal Surfaces with Varying Magnetic Ordering., S.Afr.j.chem. (Online) vol.74. Durban 2021., https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2021/v74a11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. B. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov, Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces, Surface Science, 343, 211–220 (1995)., 10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. E. Clementi, D. L. Raimondi, and W. P. Reinhardt., Atomic Screening Constants from SCF Functions. II. Atoms with 37 to 86 Electrons: J. Chem. Phys. 47, 1300 (1967); doi: 10.1063/1.1712084., i) http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1712084, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond. Cornell University Press.,Tablas complementarias: WebElements (O y Ni).,https://www.webelements.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. NIST Atomic Spectra Database – Ionization Energies., https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/ionEnergy.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Slater, J. C.“Atomic Radii in Crystals.”.,J. Chem. Phys. 1964, 41, 3199.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1725697 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hüfner, S.,“Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications.” Springer, 3rd edition, 2003. ISBN 3-540-60875-3 2nd Edition Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nazmul Islam, Dulal C. Ghosh, The Electronegativity and the Global Hardness Are Periodic Properties of Atoms, Journal of Quantum Information Science, 2011, 1, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2011.13019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sangjoon Lee, Clio Chen, Griheydi Garcia, Anton Oliynyk, Machine learning descriptors in materials chemistry used in multiple experimentally validated studies: Oliynyk elemental property dataset, Data in Brief, Volume 53, April 2024, 110178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110178 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lindsey N. Anderson, M. Belén Oviedo, Bryan M. Wong, Accurate Electron Affinities and Orbital Energies of Anions from a Non-Empirically Tuned Range-Separated Density Functional Theory Approach, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 13, 1656 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. J. Hu, Adel Al-Salihy, B.Zhang, S.Li, P. Xu., Mastering the D-Band Center of Iron-Series Metal-Based Electrocatalysts for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting., Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 6;23(23):15405. doi:10.3390/ijms232315405https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Bhattacharjee, S.; Waghmare, U. V.; Lee, S.-C.,An improved d-band model of the catalytic activity of magnetic transition metal surfaces.,Scientific Reports, 6, 35916 (2016)., https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35916 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ruban, A.; Hammer, B.; Stoltze, P.; Skriver, H. L.; Nørskov, J. K.,Surface electronic structure and reactivity of transition and noble metals.,Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 115 (3), 421–429 (1997).,https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1169(96)00348-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ossowski, T.; Kiejna, A.,Oxygen adsorption on Fe(110) surface revisited, Surface Science, 637–638, 35–41 (2015).,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2015.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Wang, T.; Wang, S.; Luo, Q.; Li, Y.-W.; Wang, J.; Beller, M.; Jia, H.,Hydrogen adsorption structures and energetics on iron surfaces at high coverage.,The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 118, 2014. DOI: 10.1021/jp410635z, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp410635z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Xin, H.; Vojvodic, A.; Voss, J.; Nørskov, J. K.; Abild-Pedersen, F., Effects of d-band shape on the surface reactivity of transition-metal alloys.Physical Review B, 89 (11), 115114 (2014).,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.115114 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Peck, M. A.; Santos-Carballal, D.; de Leeuw, N. H.; Claeys, M.,Density Functional Theory Study of the Adsorption of Oxygen and Hydrogen on 3d Transition Metal Surfaces with Varying Magnetic Ordering., South African Journal of Chemistry 2021, 74, Article a11., https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2021/v74a11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zhang, S.; Li, K.; Ma, Y.; Bu, Y.; Liang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, J., The Adsorption Mechanism of Hydrogen on FeO Crystal Surfaces: A Density Functional Theory Study., Nanomaterials 2023, 13 (14), 2051., https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13142051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. D. M. Newns, Self-consistent model of hydrogen chemisorption on transition metals, Phys. Rev. 178, 1123 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.178.1123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Greeley, J.; Nørskov, J. K. Large-scale, density functional theory-based screening of alloys for hydrogen evolution. Surface Science 2007, 601 (6), 1590–1598., DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2007.01.037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. B. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov, Theoretical surface science and catalysis — calculations and concepts, Adv. Catal. 45, 71 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-0564(02)45013-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kitchin et al. (J. Chem. Phys. 2004) / Takigawa 2016. backend.orbit.dtu.dk+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Islam, A.; Li, Q.; Storimans, E.; Ton, K.; Alam, T.; Farhat, Z. N., Effect of Microstructure on Hydrogen Permeation and Trapping in Natural Gas Pipeline Steels., npj Mater. Degrad. 2025, 9, 70., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-025-00615-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Li, Y.; Wei, H.; Zheng, S.; Kong, J.; Wen, L.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhou, L.; Shen, G.; Domblesky, J. P.; Hussain, G.; Ostrikov, K. (Ken)., Hydrogen Adsorption and Diffusion on the Surface of Alloyed Steel: First-Principles Studies., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 54, 1478–1486., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.046 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Devi, A. A. S.; Javaheri, V.; Pallaspuro, S.; Komi, J., First-Principles Insights into Hydrogen Interaction with Alloyed Surfaces., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024, 26, 26222–26237., https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CP02233E [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Takigawa 2016 / revisiones. eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sebastian Schnur and Axel Gro . Strain and coordination e ects in the adsorption properties of early transition metals Institut fur Theoretische Chemie, Universitat Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, German., Early_dband_metals_dist.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov, Why gold is the noblest of all the metals, Nature 376, 238–240 (1995).,https://doi.org/10.1038/376238a0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. D. M. Newns, Self-consistent model of hydrogen chemisorption on transition metals, Phys. Rev. 178, 1123–1135 (1969).,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.178.1123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. J. R. Kitchin et al., J. Chem. Phys., 2004., Modification of the surface electronic and chemical properties of Pt(111) by subsurface transition metals., J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10240–10246 (2004)., Kit.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nørskov et al., J. Catal., 2008 (aplicaciones catalíticas); S. Hüfner, Photoelectron Spectroscopy (análisis p-d)., https://scispace.com/pdf/using-photoelectron-spectroscopy-and-quantum-mechanics-to-1hirrypw08.pdf., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. B. Hammer and J. K. Nørskov, Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces. Surface Science 343, 211–220 (1995).,https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Jing Hu, A. Al-Salihy, B. Zhang, S. Li, P. Xu., Mastering the D-Band Center of Iron-Series Metal-Based Electrocatalysts for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Water Splitting., Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 6;23(23):15405. , https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Q. Zhu, W.Huang, C.Huang, L. Gao,Y. Su, L.Qiao., The d band center as an indicator for the hydrogen solution and diffusion behaviors in transition metals., International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. Volume 47, Issue 90,(2022), Pages 38445-38454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. F. Xie, C. Yuan, H.Tan, A.Z. Moshfegh, B. Zhu, J. Yu., d-Band Center Regulated O2 Adsorption on Transition Metal Single Atoms Loaded COF: A DFT Study., Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica Volume 40, Issue 11,(2024), 2407013., https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202407013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Drexler, M. Galler, H. Elsayed, R. Vallant, C. Sommitsch., Critical verification of the effective diffusion concept, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy Volume 48, Issue 20, (2023), Pages 7499-7514., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. A. Drexler, S. Pastore, J. Domitner., Modeling bulk diffusion of hydrogen in X70 pipeline steel., Scientific Reports volume 15, 6363 (2025)., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90130-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. .D. Mallick, N. Mary, V. S. Raja, B. Normand., Study of Diffusible Behavior of Hydrogen in First Generation Advanced High Strength Steels., Metals 2021, 11, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050782 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. N. Venkata S. Korlapati,F. Khan, S. Vaddiraju, T. Cagin., Hydrogen diffusion dynamics on Fe(100) surface: A mechanism of hydrogen-induced failure., International Journal of Hydrogen Energy Volume 65, (2024), Pages 177-185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. T. Tanabe, Y. Yamanishi, S. Imoto., Hydrogen Transport through Highly Purified Iron., Transactions of the Japan Institute of Metals 25(1):1-10., DOI:10.2320/matertrans1960.25.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Ulrike Diebold., Surface Science Reports 48 (2003) 53–229., https://nathan.instras.com/documentDB/paper-38.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. M. M. Montemore., M. A. van Spronsen., R. J. Madix., C. M. Friend., O2 Activation by Metal Surfaces: Implications for Bonding and Reactivity on Heterogeneous Catalysts., Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5, 2816–2862., https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00217 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. K. Kiuchi, R. B. McLellan, The solubility and diffusivity of hydrogen in well-annealed iron, Acta Metallurgica, 31, 961–984 (1983)..,https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(83)90192-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. H. K. Birnbaum, P. Sofronis, Hydrogen-enhanced localized plasticity — a mechanism for hydrogen-related fracture, Materials Science and Engineering A, 176, 191–202 (1994)., https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(94)90975-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Sieverts (1929); Röthig et al. (2025). Absorption of gases by metals.,https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11661-010-0394-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Gangloff, R. P..,Hydrogen Embrittlement., ASM Handbook, Volume 13: CorrosionDOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v13.9781627081899.,.,https://dl.asminternational.org/handbooks/book/12/asm-handbook-volume-13a-corrosion-fundamentals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Marcolongo, S. Zulueta, T. A. Pham., The role of density functional theory in decoding the complexities of hydrogen embrittlement in steels. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024. DOI: 10.1039/D4CP02233E., https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/cp/d4cp02233e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Y. Jiang, T. J. Rauguth, J. G. Che., Surface Structure and Energetics of Hydrogen Adsorption on the Fe(110) Surface., DOI: 10.1021/jp051907s., PubMed: 16852778., https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp051907s [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. M. A. Niyaz, A. B. A. R. Hafiz, K. M. M. D. H. Islam., Advances., DOI: 10.1039/D1RA04999B.,https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/ra/d1ra04999b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. L. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Liu., The Adsorption Mechanism of Hydrogen on FeO Crystal Surfaces: A Density Functional Theory Study. Nanomaterials 2023. DOI: 10.3390/nano13142051.,https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/13/14/2051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Y. Li, L. Wang, H. Wang, X. Shu.,First-principles study of interactions of oxygen–carbon–vacancy in bcc Fe., Chinese Physics B., 2019, 28(10), 106102.,https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ab3a8f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. B., Xing, J. Wu, J. Cheng, L. Zhang, M.Wu., Hydrogen diffusion in α-Fe2O3: Implication for an effective hydrogen diffusion barrier., Int.Journal of Hydrogen Energy., V(45), Issue 56, November 2020, Pages 32648-32653., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Nørskov dataset / Takigawa 2016. eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Vojvodic, A.; Nørskov, J. K.; Abild-Pedersen, F. Electronic structure effects in transition metal surface chemistry. Topics in Catalysis 2014, 57 (1-4), 25–32.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0159-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. S. Saini., J. H. Stenlid., F. A-Pedersen., Electronic structure factors and the importance of adsorbate effects in chemisorption on surface alloys., npj Computational Materials., v(8), Article number:163 (2022)., https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00846-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev. 124, 41 (1961).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.124.41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]