Challenges in Science Education: The Impact of Limited Teacher Training on Hands-on Learning

Authors

Lorena Mortel Amatiaga

Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay City (Philippines)

Lolita A. Dulay

Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010083

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 953-955

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-11

Accepted: 2026-01-17

Published: 2026-02-01

Abstract

Hands-on learning is essential for effective science education, enabling students to engage directly with concepts through experimentation, observation, and inquiry. However, many basic education classrooms prioritize lecture-based instruction, hindering deeper understanding and critical thinking due to teachers' limited preparation in facilitating experiential activities. This qualitative descriptive study examines the impact of inadequate teacher training on implementing hands-on science lessons among science teachers at Halapitan National High School. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with these teachers, classroom observations, and reviews of lesson plans and training records. Findings indicate that undertrained teachers exhibit low confidence in conducting experiments, struggle with classroom management, and face challenges adapting to resource limitations, resulting in infrequent use of hands-on strategies and underdeveloped inquiry-based learning. Resource constraints exacerbate these issues, diminishing lesson quality and frequency. The study underscores the urgency of enhancing pre-service and in-service training with practical, skills-based components to boost teacher competence, foster student curiosity, engagement, and scientific literacy.

Keywords

Hands-on learning, Science education, Experimentation

Downloads

References

1. Baniqued, P. P., & Bautista, J. R. (2024). The perceptions of pre‑service and in‑service teachers regarding a project‑based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus / PM [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Darling‑Hammond, L., et al. (2023). The effect of professional development on in‑service STEM teachers’ self‑efficacy: a meta‑analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(37) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Laius, A., & Presmann, M. (2025). The pre‑service teachers’ perceptions of integrated teaching, inquiry learning, using ICT, and real‑life examples in science classes. Science Education International, 35(2), 92‑101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2025). Improving Science Education for All. National Academies Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Science Education International (2025). Science Education International, Vol. 35(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Guo et al. (2024). A reflective study on adopting inquiry‑based science teaching methods, Disciplinary & Interdisciplinary Science Education Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Laid, S. M. T., & Adlaon, M. S. (2025). A Systematic Review of Innovative Teaching Strategies in Science: Exploring Hands‑on Learning, Technology Integration, and Student‑Centered Approaches. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(2), 101–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Edulan, D. J. B., & Fajardo, M. T. M. (2024). Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, Motivation, and Support Needs for Out‑of‑Field Science Teachers in Western Mindanao. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(7), 271‑281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Baniqued, W. B., & Bautista, R. G. (2024). Teachers’ Preparedness on Pedagogical Practices in K‑12 Science Education: Foundations for Crafting an Effective Science Program. American Journal of Educational Research, 12(8), 291–297 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Teachers Institute (2023). Advancing Science Education: The Professional Development of Science Teachers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles