Comparative Study of Pathogen Removal and Environmental Safety in Public Toilet Sanitation (Bio fermented vs. Conventional Disinfectants)

This comparative case study examines the efficacy and environmental safety of biofermented (probiotic-based) cleaners versus conventional chemical disinfectants in the sanitation of public toilets—a critical facet of urban public health infrastructure. The analysis synthesizes evidence from over 40 peer-reviewed studies, focusing on pathogen removal rates, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) implications, operational sustainability, and life cycle environmental impacts. Findings show that biofermented cleaners achieve comparable or superior pathogen reduction and provide sustained microbial suppression through competitive exclusion, virtually eliminating the risk of AMR amplification—a major limitation of chemical disinfectants. Cost-benefit analysis using INR values highlights a potential 75% reduction in total operational costs when adopting biofermented systems at scale. Additionally, environmental impact assessments demonstrate that enzyme-based cleaners are fully biodegradable and produce negligible toxic residues, contrasting sharply with the high environmental burden and disinfection byproduct formation of chlorine- and quaternary ammonium-based disinfectants. The study concludes by recommending pilot implementation and regulatory recognition of biofermented cleaners for public sanitation in India, citing benefits for public health, environmental sustainability, and economic efficiency.

Public toilets represent critical infrastructure for public health

1. Ramos, A., & Frantz, A. L. (2023). Probiotic-Based Sanitation in the Built Environment—An Alternative to Chemical Disinfectants. Applied Microbiology, 3(2), 38. doi: 10.3390/applmicrobiol3020038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Falagas, M. E., et al. (2025). Probiotic-Based Cleaning Solutions: From Research Hypothesis to Infection Control Applications. Biology, 14(8), 1043. doi: 10.3390/biology14081043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. D'Accolti, M., Soffritti, I., Bini, F., et al. (2022). Pathogen Control in the Built Environment: A Probiotic-Based System as a Remedy for the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance. Microorganisms, 10(2), 225. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Caselli, E. (2017). Hygiene: microbial strategies to reduce pathogens and drug resistance in clinical settings. Microbial Biotechnology, 11(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. D'Accolti, M., Soffritti, I., Bini, F., et al. (2024). Tackling transmission of infectious diseases: A probiotic-based system as a remedy for the spread of pathogenic and resistant microbes. Microbial Biotechnology, 17(7), e14529. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Abney, S. E., Bright, K. R., McKinney, J., et al. (2021). Toilet Hygiene - Review and Research Needs. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 130(4), 1019-1030. doi: 10.1111/JAM.15121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, W., Yang, H., Peng, C., et al. (2023). Resolving the "health vs environment" dilemma with sustainable disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 2627-2635. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25167-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Komarov, M., Pospelov, A., Korob, N., & Krisko, O. (2024). Environmental impact assessment of disinfectants. Herald of Polotsk State University. Series F. Civil Engineering. Applied Sciences, 36(1), 87-93. doi: 10.52928/2070-1683-2024-36-1-87-93 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Homyer, K. M., & Mehendale, F. V. (2023). Time to rethink medical disinfection from a planetary health perspective. Journal of Global Health Reports, 7, e87862. doi: 10.29392/001c.87862 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Stone, W., Tolmay, J., Tucker, K., et al. (2020). Disinfectant, Soap or Probiotic Cleaning? Surface Microbiome Diversity and Biofilm Competitive Exclusion. Microorganisms, 8(11), 1726. doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8111726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ahmed, O. B., & Mashat, B. H. (2015). Efficacy of three disinfectant agents against contaminating pathogens isolated from public toilets. International Journal of Pathogen Research, 11(1204), 1-8. doi: 10.9734/ijpr/2022/v11i1204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mehmood, M. D., et al. (2024). An assessment of various disinfectants using the Kirby-Bauer Method with disc diffusion to determine their effectiveness against locally isolated pathogens. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 14(6), 6612. doi: 10.22270/jddt.v14i6.6612 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Roy, S. K., Datta, A., Ghosh, A., et al. (2020). Studies on the susceptibility of common uropathogens to toilet seat sanitizers and their antibiogram. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(9), 5178. doi: 10.31032/ijbpas/2020/9.9.517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Binazzi, M., & Andreassi, L. (2005). SARS-CoV-2 transmission risks in public toilets. Clinical Dermatology. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2005.07.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Barker, T., Capone, D., Amato, H. K., et al. (2023). Public toilets have reduced enteric pathogen hazards in San Francisco. PLOS Water, 2(8), e0000152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lee, M. C. J., & Tham, K. W. (2021). Public toilets with insufficient ventilation present high cross infection risk. Scientific Reports, 11, 20522. doi: 10.1038/S41598-021-00166-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Caselli, E. (2017). Hygiene: microbial strategies to reduce pathogens and drug resistance in clinical settings. Microbial Biotechnology, 11(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shestopalov, N. V., & Shandala, M. G. (2014). Bio-pathogens as a significant health risk factor and their control in environment. Health Risk Analysis, 4, 2-17. doi: 10.21668/HEALTH.RISK/2014.4.02.ENG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Artasensi, A., Mazzotta, S., Fumagalli, L., & Sangalli, A. (2021). Back to Basics: Choosing the Appropriate Surface Disinfectant. The Journal of Antibiotics, 74(6), 613-625. doi: 10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS10060613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. de Moura, I. E. M. O., & da Silva, E. A. (2024). Eco-efficiency improvement strategies for disinfectants. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 43(3), e14478. doi: 10.1002/ep.14478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Romero-Fierro, D., Bustamante-Torres, M., Hidalgo-Bonilla, S., & García, J. (2021). Microbial Degradation of Disinfectants. In Emerging Challenges in Food Safety and Health (pp. 61-78). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0518-5_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Denkel, L. A., Voß, A., Caselli, E., et al. (2024). Can probiotics trigger a paradigm shift for cleaning healthcare environments? A narrative review. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 13, 474. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01474-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. D'Accolti, M., Soffritti, I., Bonfante, F., et al. (2021). Potential of an Eco-Sustainable Probiotic-Cleaning Formulation in Reducing Infectivity of Enveloped Viruses. Viruses, 13(11), 2227. doi: 10.3390/v13112227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. D'Accolti, M., Soffritti, I., Bini, F., et al. (2023). Shaping the subway microbiome through probiotic-based sanitation during the COVID-19 emergency: a pre–post case–control study. Microbiome, 11, 76. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01512-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Singh, D., Dimri, A. G., Pandey, A., et al. (2024). Analysis of biocidal efficacies of various disinfectant systems against bacteria, fungi and bacteriophage lambda: A comparative assessment. Science Insights, 11, 915. doi: 10.62110/sciencein.btl.2024.v11.915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Collete, A. B., Silva, V. E., de Souza, J. M., & Peixoto, H. (2014). Avaliação da atividade bactericida de desinfetantes comerciais em amostras bacterianas isoladas de banheiros públicos. Ciência & Engenharia, 6(3), 110-118. doi: 10.5747/CV.2014.V06.N3.V110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mohammed, B. B., Shawket, D. S., Shatti, Z. O., & Al-Dujaili, A. H. (2023). Carga microbiana en los servicios higiénicos: Una revisión bibliográfica. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(2), 693. doi: 10.56712/latam.v4i2.693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kundu, M., Omar, A., Buziak, B., et al. (2023). Customizing Sanitization Protocols for Food-Borne Pathogens Based on Biofilm Formation, Surfaces and Disinfectants. Applied Microbiology, 4(1), 3. doi: 10.3390/applmicrobiol4010003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tang, J. (2025). Quantitative Benchmarking of Household Surface Decontamination: Comparing Chemical Disinfectants, Natural Alternatives, and Physical Removal of Environmental Microbes. Research Square Preprint. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6448022/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nakagawa, N., Oe, H., Otaki, M., & Okada, M. (2006). Application of microbial risk assessment on a residentially-operated Bio-toilet. Journal of Water and Health, 4(4), 339-351. doi: 10.2166/WH.2006.0031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Aisy, R., Rusmiati, Ipmawati, P. A., & Sudijanto, T. (2024). Toilet Cleaning Process And The Presence Of Mold In Public Toilet Basins. International Journal of Advanced Health Science and Technology, 4(4), 382. doi: 10.35882/ijahst.v4i4.382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Singh, D., et al. (2024). Analysis of biocidal efficacies (Conference presentation). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Gerba, C. P. (2025). Impact of Restroom Disinfecting/Cleaning Frequency and Product Selection on Risk of Infection. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 12(1), e631.457. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae631.457 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Fontana, R., Marzola, M., Buratto, M., et al. (2022). Analysis of Civil Environments Cleaning Services—Microbiological and LCA Analysis after Traditional and Sustainable Procedures. Sustainability, 15(1), 696. doi: 10.3390/su15010696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Borges, A., Abreu, H., Dias, S., et al. (2014). New perspectives on the use of phytochemicals as an emerging strategy to control bacterial infections. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 21(21), 2400-2419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Barker, T., Capone, D., Amato, H. K., et al. (2023). Public toilets have reduced enteric pathogen hazards in San Francisco (MedRxiv Preprint). doi: 10.1101/2023.02.10.23285757 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Keim, E. K. (2015). Inactivation of pathogens by a novel composting toilet: bench-scale and field-scale studies. PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. EPA Guidelines on Disinfectant Residues in Wastewater. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Choi, H. Y., Kwon, W. T., Lee, W. S., & others. (2012). Microbial Distribution Survey in Public Lavatories. Korean Environmental Journal, 1, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Fontana, R., Marzola, M., Buratto, M., et al. (2022). Analysis of Civil Environments Cleaning Services—Microbiological and LCA Analysis after Traditional and Sustainable Procedures. Sustainability, 15(1), 696. doi: 10.3390/su15010696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. D'Accolti, M., Soffritti, I., Bini, F., et al. (2024). Tackling transmission of infectious diseases: A probiotic-based system as a remedy for the spread of pathogenic and resistant microbes. Microbial Biotechnology, 17(7), e14529. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nakagawa, N., Oe, H., Otaki, M., & Okada, M. (2006). Application of microbial risk assessment on a residentially-operated Bio-toilet. Journal of Water and Health, 4(4), 339-351. doi: 10.2166/WH.2006.0031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Singh, D., Dimri, A. G., Pandey, A., et al. (2024). Analysis of biocidal efficacies of various disinfectant systems against bacteria, fungi and bacteriophage lambda: A comparative assessment. Science Insights, 11, 915. doi: 10.62110/sciencein.btl.2024.v11.915 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Abney, S. E., Bright, K. R., McKinney, J., et al. (2021). Toilet Hygiene - Review and Research Needs. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 130(4), 1019-1030. doi: 10.1111/JAM.15121 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Ahmed, O. B., & Mashat, B. H. (2015). Efficacy of three disinfectant agents against contaminating pathogens isolated from public toilets. International Journal of Pathogen Research, 11(1204), 1-8. doi: 10.9734/ijpr/2022/v11i1204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Shestopalov, N. V., & Shandala, M. G. (2014). Bio-pathogens as a significant health risk factor and their control in environment. Health Risk Analysis, 4, 2-17. doi: 10.21668/HEALTH.RISK/2014.4.02.ENG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Artasensi, A., Mazzotta, S., Fumagalli, L., & Sangalli, A. (2021). Back to Basics: Choosing the Appropriate Surface Disinfectant. The Journal of Antibiotics, 74(6), 613-625. doi: 10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS10060613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Stone, W., Tolmay, J., Tucker, K., et al. (2020). Disinfectant, Soap or Probiotic Cleaning? Surface Microbiome Diversity and Biofilm Competitive Exclusion. Microorganisms, 8(11), 1726. doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8111726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. ISO 14161. (2012). Disinfectants and antiseptics - chemical disinfectants and antiseptics for human hygiene purposes. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. EPA - Registered Disinfectants. (2023). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. WHO. (2019). Water, sanitation, hygiene and health: A primer for health professionals. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2017). IS 5887 - Code of practice for safety in laboratories. New Delhi, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Ministry of Housing & Urban Affairs. (2023). Guidelines for Public Toilet Sanitation Standards. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Lee, M. C. J., & Tham, K. W. (2021). Public toilets with insufficient ventilation present high cross infection risk. Scientific Reports, 11, 20522. doi: 10.1038/S41598-021-00166-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Chen, W., Yang, H., Peng, C., et al. (2023). Resolving the "health vs environment" dilemma with sustainable disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 2627-2635. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25167-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Fontana, R., Marzola, M., Buratto, M., et al. (2022). Analysis of Civil Environments Cleaning Services—Microbiological and LCA Analysis after Traditional and Sustainable Procedures. Sustainability, 15(1), 696. doi: 10.3390/su15010696 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar