Comparison of Missing Value Imputation Methods for Longitudinal Data: Mathematical Formulations and Simulation Performance
Authors
Department of Statistics, SDM College, Ujire (India)
Department of Business Administration, SDM College, Ujire (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1310000033
Subject Category: Mathematics
Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 496-500
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-09
Accepted: 2026-10-14
Published: 2026-10-29
Abstract
Longitudinal studies frequently suffer from missing data due to attrition, missed visits, or unmeasured events. Standard complete-case analysis compromises statistical power and introduces severe parameter bias under non-random missingness. This paper provides a rigorous mathematical framework and experimental evaluation comparing six imputation approaches for longitudinal numerical data: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF), Linear Interpolation, Mean Imputation, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Expectation-Maximization (EM) using multivariate normal parameters, and Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) with linear mixed-effects modeling. We formalize each method mathematically within a repeated-measures context and evaluate performance across Missing Completely at Random (MCAR) and Missing at Random (MAR) mechanisms at missingness rates of 10%, 25%, and 40%. Performance is benchmarked using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Bias, and Coverage Probability of the fixed-effects trajectory parameters in a linear mixed model (LMM). A fully reproducible simulation script written in R is provided to execute the benchmark and visualize parameter recovery.
Keywords
Longitudinal Data Analysis, Missing Data, Multiple Imputation, MICE, Linear Mixed-Effects Models, Expectation-Maximization, Simulation Benchmark.
Downloads
References
1. Engels, J. M., & Diehr, P. (2003). Imputation of missing longitudinal data: A comparison of methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(10), 968–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00170-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Sterne, J. A., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, b2393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2393 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Van Buuren, S. (2018). Flexible Imputation of Missing Data (2nd ed.). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
- Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
- Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
- Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
- Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples