Compliance Gaps in Public Procurement and Contract Management: Empirical Evidence from the Controller and Auditor General Audit Reports on Public Authorities and Other Bodies in Tanzania (2014/5–2023/24)
Authors
Research Officer, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Division, National Audit Office of Tanzania, Dodoma, United Republic of Tanzania (Tanzania)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12120077
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 12/12 | Page No: 907-915
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-22
Accepted: 2025-12-28
Published: 2026-01-07
Abstract
Public procurement and contract management account for a substantial proportion of public expenditure in Tanzania and play a critical role in public financial management, accountability, and value for money. Despite successive procurement reforms, including the enactment of the Public Procurement Act No. 10 of 2023, audit evidence continues to reveal persistent compliance challenges across public authorities. This study examines procurement and contract management compliance gaps using longitudinal audit evidence from the Controller and Auditor General's (CAG) Annual Reports on the Audit of Public Authorities and Other Bodies, covering the ten years from the 2014/15 to 2023/24 Financial Years.
The study adopts a qualitative document analysis design, systematically reviewing audit findings across the procurement cycle and contract lifecycle to identify recurring areas of non-compliance and assess their persistence and evolution over time. Audit observations were thematically analyzed with particular attention to procurement planning, tendering procedures, contract supervision, performance securities, payment administration, and contract variations.
The findings reveal that compliance gaps are systemic and persistent, with weaknesses concentrated largely in the post-award phase of procurement. Recurring issues include weak contract supervision, expired or insufficient performance securities, delayed payments, frequent contract variations, and misalignment between procurement plans and implementation. While regulatory reforms have expanded the scope of compliance obligations, the evidence indicates that legal changes alone have not been sufficient to eliminate long-standing governance weaknesses. Instead, limited institutional capacity, weak enforcement, and inadequate follow-up on audit recommendations continue to undermine procurement performance.
The study demonstrates the analytical value of Supreme Audit Institution evidence in assessing procurement governance over time. It contributes to both academic literature and policy dialogue by highlighting the need to complement legal reforms with strengthened contract management systems, institutional learning, and accountability mechanisms. The findings underscore the importance of leveraging audit evidence as a tool for improving procurement governance and public sector performance in developing country contexts.
Keywords
Public procurement; Contract management
Downloads
References
1. Aboelmaged, M. (2021). E-procurement adoption in developing countries: A systematic review. International Journal of Procurement Management, 14(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Acheampong, A., Ameyaw, E. E., & Mensah, S. (2022). Audit reports as accountability tools in public sector governance: Evidence from developing economies. Public Money & Management, 42(6), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1997133 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ameyaw, C., & Mensah, S. (2023). Institutional capacity and compliance challenges in public procurement systems. Journal of Public Procurement, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP06-2022-0042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Basheka, B. C., & Auriacombe, C. J. (2020). Public procurement reforms in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 8(1), Article a382. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v8i1.382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply. (2022). Contract management guide. CIPS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Controller and Auditor General. (2015–2024). Annual reports on the audit of public authorities and other bodies. National Audit Office of Tanzania. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Domberger, S. (2018). The contracting organisation: A strategic guide to outsourcing. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Flynn, A., & Davis, P. (2017). Theory in public procurement research. Journal of Public Procurement, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2017-0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. INTOSAI. (2019). Principles of transparency and accountability (INTOSAI-P 20). International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kaufmann, D., & Carter, J. (2022). Public procurement reform and contract governance: International evidence. Governance, 35(3), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lonsdale, J., Wilkins, P., & Ling, T. (2020). Performance auditing: Contributing to accountability in democratic government. Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Morin, D. (2021). Supreme Audit Institutions and public sector reform: Beyond compliance. Financial Accountability & Management, 37(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12261 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Public procurement and integrity: A framework for accountability. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3b6f9c69en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Public procurement for sustainable and inclusive growth. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4baf1cdd-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Prier, E., & McCue, C. (2020). Procurement and contract management in public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 26(4), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2020.1754068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Prier, E., McCue, C., & Behara, R. (2021). Contract management capability and performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-2020-0057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Schapper, P., Malta, J., & Gilbert, D. (2020). An analytical framework for public procurement governance. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(2), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-112019-0074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Søreide, T. (2019). Corruption in public procurement: Causes, consequences and cures. Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Thai, K. V. (2017). International handbook of public procurement. CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Transparency International. (2020). Preventing corruption in public procurement. Transparency International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. World Bank. (2020). Enhancing government effectiveness through procurement reform. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. World Bank. (2022). Public financial management and procurement systems: Governance diagnostic. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria