Craft, Care and the Self: Fashion as a Reflective and Expressive Practice

Craft has long been studied in India as an economic resource, a heritage practice, or a tool for rural upliftment. What has received far less attention is how craft functions as a practice of self-expression, ethical engagement, and relational care—particularly within Indian fashion education. This paper attempts to address that gap.
The study draws on semi-structured qualitative interviews with three practitioners: a craft-based designer, an embroidery artist, and a fashion educator, supplemented by reflective observation of expressive making workshops in institutional settings in India and Denmark. The paper argues that craft, as a relational and embodied practice, offers a framework for fashion educators to develop care, critical awareness and ethical responsibility in students.
The research studies Indian craft traditions, specifically Kantha embroidery and Jamdani weaving from West Bengal, in regard to care ethics, feminist craft scholarship, and material culture. Thematic analysis of interview data and field notes produces four themes: craft as negotiation of the self, slowness and embodied reflection, craft as everyday agency, and craft as relational care. The study concludes that fashion pedagogy at institutions such as NIFT would benefit from a deeper engagement with craft as a lived, socially embedded, and ethically situated practice, rather than primarily as a technical or heritage-orientated discipline.

craft pedagogy, care ethics, Indian craft traditions, slow fashion, Kantha embroidery, reflective practice, fashion education, embodied knowledge, design education, tacit knowledge

1. Adamson, G. (2013) The Invention of Craft. London: Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bakshi, C. (n.d.) Recreating Craft: Accelerating Indian Craft Businesses. Startup Oasis. Available at: https://www.startupoasis.in/craft-book-wecompresscom.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bissett-Johnson, K. and Moorhead, D. (2019) 'Co-creating craft: Australian designers meet artisans in India', Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.32873/unl.dc.tsasp.0004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) 'Using thematic analysis in psychology', Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2019) 'Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis', Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), pp. 589–597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chapman, J. (2005) Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences and Empathy. London: Earthscan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J.W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dissanayake, E. (1995) Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes from and Why. Seattle: University of Washington Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Entwistle, J. (2000) The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fletcher, K. (2014) Sustainable Fashion and Textiles: Design Journeys. 2nd edn. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gauntlett, D. (2018) Making is Connecting: The Social Power of Creativity, from Craft and Knitting to Digital Everything. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ghosh, P. (2020) Making Kantha, Making Home: Women at Work in Colonial Bengal. Seattle: University of Washington Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hochscheid, H. and Russell, B. (eds.) (2023) 'Crafting as making, thinking and being (together)', in The Value of Making (Studies in Classical Archaeology, 13). Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 13–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ingold, T. (2013) Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jung, S. and Jin, B. (2022) 'Slow fashion is positively linked to consumers' well-being: Evidence from an online questionnaire study', Sustainability, 14(21), p. 13990. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, N. (2015) The Artisans of Banaras. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McNiff, S. (2004) Art Heals: How Creativity Cures the Soul. Boston: Shambhala Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Noddings, N. (1984) Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Palit, S. (2021) 'Collaborative models for uplifting the craft clusters of India: A case study of the Kantha of West Bengal', in Proceedings of ICMCD-2021. Bhopal: Jagran Lakecity University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Palit, S. (2023) Kantha: A Transformative Study and Predictions towards a Sustainable Future. Shodhganga@INFLIBNET. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/459824 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Parker, R. (1984) The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. London: The Women's Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Patel, R. (2021) 'Decolonising craft pedagogy in Indian design education', Design Studies, 73, pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sennett, R. (2008) The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sharma, P. and Mehta, A. (2022) 'Craft, power, and pedagogy in postcolonial fashion education', Fashion Theory, 26(3), pp. 311–334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Thorpe, A. (2022) 'Making and learning: Craft as pedagogy in sustainable fashion education', International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 15(1), pp. 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Willett, J., Saunders, C., Hackney, F. and Hill, K. (2022) 'The affective economy and fast fashion: Materiality, embodied learning and developing a sensibility for sustainable clothing', Journal of Consumer Culture, 23(2), pp. 292–310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Williams, J. (2023) 'Slow pedagogy: Craft, time, and attention in design education', Design Education Forum, 18(2), pp. 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Woodward, S. (2007) Why Women Wear What They Wear. Oxford: Berg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Interview References [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Dutta, S. (2025) Interview with the author. Personal communication, Kolkata, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Lahiri, S. (2025) Interview with the author. Personal communication, Kolkata, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Sarkar, P. (2025) Interview with the author. Personal communication, Kolkata, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]