Cross-Validated Machine Learning Models for Smartphone Battery State-of-Health Classification

Authors

Adenodi Raphael Adewale ORCID icon for Adenodi Raphael Adewale

Department of Physics, Adeyemi Federal University of Education, Ondo (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000436

Subject Category: Computer Science

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 5953-5959

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-13

Accepted: 2026-08-18

Published: 2026-08-24

Abstract

This study investigates the application of Machine Learning (ML) classification models for assessing smartphone battery State-of-Health (SoH) using temperature, usage, environment, and device-related parameters. A dataset comprising 675 observations and 15 attributes was obtained from ten smartphones, with battery SoH categorized as Poor, Fair, or Good. Eight ML algorithms: Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Gradient Boosting (GB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), CN2 Rule Induction (CN2-RI), and k-Nearest Neighbour (kNN), were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. The results indicate substantial differences in model performance across battery-SoH and smartphones, with notable difficulty in correctly identifying Good and Fair SoH and a tendency among several models to classify these conditions as Poor. LR achieved a high number of correct Poor-SoH predictions, while DT and NB showed comparatively more balanced performance across the SoH. The findings demonstrate the potential of ML for smartphone battery-SoH classification but also highlight the effects of SoH imbalance and the need for SoH-sensitive evaluation when selecting reliable predictive models.

Keywords

classification, cross-validation, state-of-health, machine learning and smartphone battery.

Downloads

References

1. Ali, H., Khan, H. A., & Pecht, M. (2023). Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 11699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38859-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandhauer, T. M., Garimella, S., & Fuller, T. F. (2011). A critical review of thermal issues in lithium-ion batteries Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 158(3), R1-R25. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3515880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Budiman, A. S., Fajarna, R., Asrol, M., Mozar, F. S., Harito, C., Pardamean, B., Speaks, D., & Djuana, E. (2025). Estimation of lead-acid battery degradation: A model for the optimization of battery energy storage system using machine learning. Electrochem, 6(33). https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem6030033. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Djuazva, I., Vionanda, D. & Zilrahmi, N. A. (2023). Comparison of Error Rate Prediction Methods of C4.5 Algorithm for Balanced Data. UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science 1(4), 297 - 305. https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Khadim, F., Noreen, I., & Muhammad, A. F. (2020). A framework for optimization of power consumption in mobile computing devices. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 39(3), 635–646. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kim, M. K., Jeong, Y. S., & Bang, I. C. (2018). Thermal analysis of lithium-ion battery-equipped smartphone explosions. International Journal Engineering Science and Technology, 22, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.12.008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Leng, F., Tan, C. M., & Pecht, M. (2015). Effect of temperature on the aging rate of Li-ion battery operating above room temperature. Scientific Reports, 5, 12967. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mansour, Y., Hammad, H., Waraga, O. A., & Talib, M. A. (2021). Energy management systems and smartphones: A systematic literature survey. Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications, Computing, Cybersecurity, and Informatics (CCCI). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCCI52664.2021.9583184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Naha, A., Khandelwal, A., Agarwal, S., Tagade, P., Hariharan, K. S., Kaushik, A., Yadu, A., Kolake, S. M., Han, S. & Oh, B. (2020). Internal short circuit detection in Li-ion batteries using supervised [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. machine learning. Scientific Reports, 10, 1301. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58021-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ovejas, V. J., & Cuadras, A. (2019). Effects of cycling on battery hysteresis and overvoltage. Scientific Reports, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51474-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pramanik, P. K. D., Sinhababu, N., Mukherjee, B., Padmanaban, S., Maity, A., Upadhyaya, B. K., Holm-Nielsen, J. B., & Choudhury, P. (2019). Power consumption analysis, measurement, management, and issues: A state-of-the-art review of smartphone battery and energy usage. IEEE Access, 7, 182113–182172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Razi, F. I. M., Daud, Z. H., C. Asus, Z., Mazali, I. I., Ardani, M. I., & Hamid, M. K. A. (2021). A review of internal resistance and temperature relationship, state of health and thermal runaway for lithium-ion battery beyond normal operating condition. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 88 (2). 123–132. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.88.2.123132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rumi, M. A., Asaduzzaman, D. M., & Hasan, H. (2015). CPU power consumption reduction in Android smartphone. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Green Energy and Technology (pp. 1–6), Dhaka, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Xu, L., Wang, S., Xi, L., Li, Y., & Gao, J. (2024). A review of thermal management and heat transfer of lithium-ion batteries. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17163873. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles