Cryptocurrency Regulation and Financial Crime in Nigeria
Authors
Centre for Peace and Security Studies, University of Port Harcourt (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000279
Subject Category: Banking and Finance
Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 4369-4385
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-05
Accepted: 2026-09-10
Published: 2026-09-21
Abstract
The rapid expansion of cryptocurrency in Nigeria has generated significant opportunities for financial innovation, digital entrepreneurship, financial inclusion and alternative forms of value transfer. At the same time, the pseudonymous, decentralised and transnational characteristics of cryptocurrency transactions have created new challenges for the prevention and control of financial crime. This article examines the relationship between cryptocurrency regulation and financial crime in Nigeria, with particular attention to money laundering, fraud, terrorist financing, tax evasion and illicit financial flows. It critically analyses Nigeria’s evolving regulatory framework and the roles of key institutions, particularly the Central Bank of Nigeria, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. The article argues that the historical tendency to approach cryptocurrency primarily through restriction or prohibition is inadequate for addressing the complexities of contemporary digital-asset activities. While regulation is necessary to protect financial-system integrity, investors and consumers, excessive restrictions may encourage informal markets, regulatory evasion and the migration of cryptocurrency activities beyond effective oversight. The study therefore advocates a coordinated, risk-based and technology-sensitive regulatory framework that distinguishes legitimate cryptocurrency activities from their criminal exploitation. It recommends stronger know-your-customer and beneficial-ownership requirements, improved blockchain-analytics capacity, enhanced inter-agency cooperation, effective digital-asset investigation and recovery mechanisms, and stronger international collaboration. The article concludes that Nigeria can effectively combat cryptocurrency-related financial crime without undermining legitimate innovation by combining proportionate regulation, technological capacity, institutional coordination and robust enforcement.
Keywords
Cryptocurrency; Regulation; Financial Crime; Money Laundering; Blockchain; Virtual Assets; Nigeria.
Downloads
References
1. Central Bank of Nigeria. 2017. Circular on Virtual Currency Operations in Nigeria. Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Central Bank of Nigeria. 2021. Letter to All Deposit Money Banks, Non-Bank Financial Institutions and Other Financial Institutions on Cryptocurrency Operations. Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Central Bank of Nigeria. 2023. Guidelines on Operations of Bank Accounts for Virtual Assets Service Providers (VASPs). Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria, December 22, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Central Bank of Nigeria. 2024. CBN Update: Guidelines on Operations of Bank Accounts for Virtual Assets Service Providers. Abuja: Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. Various years. Annual Reports and Publications. Abuja: Economic and Financial Crimes Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Federal Republic of Nigeria. 1999. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as Amended). Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2022. Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2023. Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Federal Republic of Nigeria. 2025. Investments and Securities Act, 2025. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Financial Action Task Force. 2019. Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Paris: FATF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Financial Action Task Force. 2020. Virtual Assets Red Flag Indicators of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. Paris: FATF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Financial Action Task Force. 2021. Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Paris: FATF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Financial Action Task Force. 2023. Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Paris: FATF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Financial Action Task Force. 2024. Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Paris: FATF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Financial Action Task Force. 2026. Targeted Update on Implementation of the FATF Standards on Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Paris: FATF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. International Monetary Fund. 2021. Global Financial Stability Report: COVID-19, Crypto Assets and Financial Stability. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. International Monetary Fund. 2023. Global Financial Stability Report: Safeguarding Financial Stability amid Tightening Conditions. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. 2022. National Inherent Risk Assessment of Money Laundering in Nigeria. Abuja: Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. 2022. National Inherent Risk Assessment of Terrorist Financing in Nigeria. Abuja: Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. 2022. National Inherent Risk Assessment of Proliferation Financing in Nigeria. Abuja: Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. 2022. National Inherent Risk Assessment of Legal Persons and Legal Arrangements in Nigeria. Abuja: Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2020. Statement on Digital Assets and Their Classification and Treatment. Abuja: Securities and Exchange Commission, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2022. Rules on Issuance, Offering Platforms and Custody of Digital Assets. Abuja: Securities and Exchange Commission, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2024. Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme (ARIP) Framework. Abuja: Securities and Exchange Commission, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2025. Digital and Virtual Asset Regulatory Framework and Related Regulatory Materials. Abuja: Securities and Exchange Commission, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2026. Public Notice on Unregistered Online Investment Schemes. Abuja: Securities and Exchange Commission, May 2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2021. Cryptocurrency and Criminality: Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Other Illicit Uses of Virtual Assets. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. World Bank. 2022. The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study on Customer Awareness on Green Banking Intiatives
- International Financial Reporting Standards and Earnings Management: A Global Research Landscape Analysis
- Analysis of Financial Performance and Operational Efficiency of State Bank of India Using the CAMEL Framework
- Roles and Performance of India Post Payment Bank (IPPB) With Special References to Shivamogga District
- Enhancing Transactional Security in U.S. Banking Systems by Implementing OTP-Based Two-Factor Authentication to Mitigate Debit and Credit Card Fraud