Deep Learning–Based Augmented Reality for Inclusive Computational Thinking Education: A Systematic Review

Computational thinking (CT) has emerged as an essential literacy skill for 21st-century learners; however, students with disabilities remain underrepresented in STEM education. While mobile augmented reality (AR) and deep learning (DL) technologies individually hold promise for creating inclusive learning environments, their convergence in CT education remains underexplored. This systematic review examines the integration of deep learning-based mobile augmented reality systems for inclusive computational thinking education. A systematic literature review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. This review revealed three significant findings. First, the integration of deep learning into mobile AR systems for CT education is in its infancy, with only one study providing empirical evidence of a fully functional DL-based augmented reality (AR) system. The vast majority of these employ static AR without adaptive capabilities. Second, a robust foundation of inclusive design principles exists, including scaffolded instruction, multimodal support, and accessible interfaces; however, these design principles have been applied predominantly to learners with cognitive and neurodevelopmental disabilities, while learners with sensory and physical impairments remain significantly underrepresented. Third, technology-mediated interventions improved CT skills and engagement across all 23 studies, but the measurement of self-efficacy was weak and predominantly qualitative, with few studies employing quantitative instruments. The three critical strands of inquiry, intelligent technology, inclusive design, and meaningful outcomes, remain disconnected. No study to date has successfully combined DL-based adaptive AR with inclusive design principles and evaluated its impact on CT skills, engagement, and self-efficacy across a broad spectrum of learners with disabilities. This review identifies gaps in the literature and proposes a roadmap for future research, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration, broader disability representation, and the development of validated self-efficacy instruments.

Deep Learning, Augmented Reality, Mobile AR, Computational Thinking

1. Abdul Hanid, M. F., Mohamad Said, M. N. H., Yahaya, N., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). Effects of augmented reality application integration with computational thinking in geometry topics. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9485-9521. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adhe, K. R., Safitri, D. G. L., Malaikosa, Y. M. L., Simatupang, N. D., & Fauziddin, M. (2025). Enhancing Children’s Critical Thinking through an Augmented Reality Application: A Digital Solution for Early Childhood Education. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 10(2), 389-411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational research review, 20, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al Omoush, M. H., & Mehigan, T. (2024). Exploring AR, VR, and educational robotics for inclusive mathematics education for dyslexic students. In: International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs - ICCHP 24, 8-12 July 2024, Linz, Austria. ISBN 978-3-903480-07-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alivia, Z. P., Kustija, J., Riza, L. S., Hafina, A., Munir, M., & Wahyudin, W. (2025). Application of Programming Algorithms to Support Computational Thinking in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Angraini, L. M., Susilawati, A., Noto, M. S., Wahyuni, R., & Andria, D. (2024). Augmented reality for cultivating computational thinking skills in mathematics completed with literature review, bibliometrics, and experiments to students. Indonesian Journal of Science & Technology, 9(01). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bertacchini, F., Scuro, C., Pantano, P., & Bilotta, E. (2022). A project based learning approach for improving students’ computational thinking skills. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9, 720448. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Costa Junior, A. D. O., Guedes, E. B., Lima e Silva, J. P. F., & Rivera, J. A. (2024). Developing computational thinking in middle school with an educational robotics resource. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 110(2), 49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of epidemiology & community health, 52(6), 377-384. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gundersen, S. W., & Lampropoulos, G. (2025). Using serious games and digital games to improve students’ computational thinking and programming skills in K-12 education: a systematic literature review. Technologies, 13(3), 113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., ... & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for information, 34(4), 285-291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Iatraki, G., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2025). Using immersive augmented reality to teach physics to students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(3), e70040. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Işik Arslanoğlu, İ., Kert, S. B., & Tonbuloğlu, İ. (2024). Think together, design together, code together: the effect of augmented reality activity designed by children on the computational thinking skills. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8493-8522. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Israel, M., Pearson, J. N., Tapia, T., Wherfel, Q. M., & Reese, G. (2015). Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis. Computers & Education, 82, 263-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Karagianni, E., & Drigas, A. (2022). The STEM education of Down syndrome children in algorithmic and computation thinking for a sustainable life. Technium Sustainability, 2(5), 58-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kert, S. B., Yeni, S., & Fatih Erkoç, M. (2022). Enhancing computational thinking skills of students with disabilities. Instructional Science, 50(4), 625-651. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lee, I. J., & Hsu, H. T. (2024). Applied the augmented reality technology combined with social stories strategies and computational thinking games to improve the social skills of children with ASD. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6346-6374. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lilis, M. A., Noto, M. S., & Muhammad, I. (2024). Augmented Reality–Based Learning Media on Mathematical Computational Thinking Ability. The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 31(2), 89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lin, P. H., & Chen, S. Y. (2020). Design and evaluation of a deep learning recommendation based augmented reality system for teaching programming and computational thinking. IEEE Access, 8, 45689–45699. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Palada, B., Chandan, V. S., Gowda, C. P., & Nikitha, P. (2024). The role of Augmented Reality (AR) in education. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(3), 1400-1408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Rakhimzhanova, L., Issabayeva, D., Kultan, J., Baimuldina, N., Issabayeva, Z., & Aituganova, Z. (2025). Using augmented reality to teach digital literacy course to primary school children with special educational needs. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 55-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rao, K., Gravel, J. W., Rose, D. H., & Tucker-Smith, T. N. (2023). Universal Design for Learning in its 3rd decade: A focus on equity, inclusion, and design. International encyclopedia of education, 6, 712-720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rao, T. S. S., & Bhagat, K. K. (2024). Computational thinking for the digital age: a systematic review of tools, pedagogical strategies, and assessment practices. Educational technology research and development, 72(4), 1893-1924. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Seo, M., Kwon, K., Thomas, B., Kim, H., & Kim, K. (2025). Integrating Augmented Reality and Collaborative Activities to Enhance Computational Thinking in K-12 Classrooms. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 14(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., ... & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. bmj, 358. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Veiga, J., Aquini, L., Pereira, K., Cavalheiro, S., Foss, L., da Rosa Junior, L., & Pernas, A. (2025, July). Computational Thinking and Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review. In Workshop sobre Educação em Computação (WEI) (pp. 1126-1138). SBC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Weng, X., Ye, H., Dai, Y., & Ng, O. L. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence and computational thinking in educational contexts: A systematic review of instructional design and student learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1420-1450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wu, C. H., Chien, Y. C., Chou, M. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2025). Integrating computational thinking, game design, and design thinking: a scoping review on trends, applications, and implications for education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wu, C. L. (2023). Using video modeling with augmented reality to teach students with developmental disabilities to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 35(3), 487-507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zhan, Z., Zhou, X., Cai, S., & Lan, X. (2025). Exploring the effect of competing mechanism in an immersive learning game based on augmented reality. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(2), 449-475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• What the Desert Fathers Teach Data Scientists: Ancient Ascetic Principles for Ethical Machine-Learning Practice
• Comparative Analysis of Some Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Ransomware
• Comparative Performance Analysis of Some Priority Queue Variants in Dijkstra’s Algorithm
• Transfer Learning in Detecting E-Assessment Malpractice from a Proctored Video Recordings.
• Dual-Modal Detection of Parkinson’s Disease: A Clinical Framework and Deep Learning Approach Using NeuroParkNet