Defining Success Criteria in Formative Assessment and Learners’ Academic Performance in History and Government: Evidence from Public Secondary Schools in Kenya

This article examines the influence of the definition of success criteria in formative assessment on learners’ academic performance in History and Government (HAG) in Kenyan public secondary schools, taking Makueni County as the empirical case. The analysis was informed by Wiliam and Thompson’s (2007) theory of formative assessment and Ramaprasad’s (1983) three conditions of feedback, both of which treat a shared standard of quality as the precondition for all subsequent formative activity. A mixed-methods descriptive design was adopted. From a target population of 4,409 principals, HAG teachers and HAG students in 393 public secondary schools, Yamane’s formula yielded a sample of 366, stratified across the county’s nine sub-counties; 316 respondents participated, an overall return rate of 86.3%. Data were gathered using questionnaires for teachers, structured interviews for principals, 26 focus group discussions with students and a document analysis guide. It was analysed using descriptive statistics, linear regression and thematic analysis. Although a majority of teachers 113 (67.0%) strongly agreeing that they regularly define the success criteria in FA as is required, 96 (57.4%) teachers reported that the FA given to learners aligns well with stated objectives. On their side, the students differed, reporting that the success criteria are rarely articulated in advance and that assessments arrive unannounced. School-level composite means regressed on five-year KCSE averages returned B = 2.242, β = .732, R² = 0.536, p < .001, and in a four-predictor model the practice carried the smallest standardised weight of the four (β = .251, p = .011). The article concludes that the constraint is not the absence of success criteria but the failure to transfer them to learners, and recommends co-construction of criteria with students, exemplar-based instruction in assessment literacy, and departmental audit of criterion transfer rather than criterion articulation.

Kenya, Makueni County, formative assessment

1. Barrow, F. (2024). The role of clear success criteria in promoting critical thinking and academic performance in Gambia. Journal of Educational Development, 22(3), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 21(1), 5–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brown, J. M. (2024). Designing formative assessments for continuous learning improvement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cohen, A., & Harris, M. (2022). Formative assessment: A tool for improving learning. Educational Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Contreras, D., & Gallardo, P. (2022). Academic performance in History and Social Studies: A case study from Chile. International Journal of Educational Research, 40(3), 87–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cotton, R. (2023). Students’ performance in national examinations: A report on Austrian secondary schools. Journal of Educational Performance, 15(4), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Eagan, T. (2023). Unlocking student success: The power of success criteria, relationships, and clarity. NECTFL Review, 90, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gedro, J., Hartman, S., & Suárez, A. (2021). The state of History, Geography, and Civics education in Haitian secondary schools. Global Journal of Education Studies, 28(1), 34–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hussein, A. K. (2023). Teachers’ use of success criteria in formative assessment and its influence on learner motivation. International Journal of Educational Assessment, 15(2), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kabaka, A. (2022). The role of formative assessment in improving student outcomes in Uganda [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Kampala. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2019). 2019 Kenya population and housing census. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kenya National Examinations Council. (2023). KCSE examination performance report. KNEC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kenya National Examinations Council. (2024). 2023 KCSE examination statistics. https://www.knec.ac.ke [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kothari, C. R. (2005). Research methodology. New International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Makueni County Director of Education Office. (2023). KCSE performance analysis report for Makueni County (2020–2023). Ministry of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Education. (2025). Secondary school examination performance report. Government of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Munguti, P. N. (2024). Influence of success criteria clarity on academic performance among secondary school students in Kitui County, Kenya. Journal of Educational Research in Africa, 9(1), 77–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Musila, R. M. (2024). Monitoring learner progress and academic achievement in Kenyan secondary schools. African Journal of Education Studies, 12(3), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Muthoka, L. M. (2022). Student assessment literacy and feedback practices in secondary schools in Makueni County. Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 59–75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Muthoka, L. M. (2024). Communication of assessment expectations and learner engagement in History and Government. Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 44–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mwanzia, M. M. (2023). Influence of formative assessment practices on students’ academic achievement in History and Government in Kenyan secondary schools [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Nairobi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. National Examinations Council of Tanzania. (2023). Certificate of Secondary Education Examination (CSEE) performance report. NECTA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nthenya, S. K. (2023). Continuous assessment practices and instructional responsiveness in public secondary schools. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Onyango, P. O., & Omondi, D. O. (2024). Alignment of formative assessment with learning objectives in history and government instruction in Kisumu East Sub-County. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 66–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Opong, R. (2024). Formative assessment and success criteria in Ghana: A phenomenological study. Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28(1), 4–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Smith, R. T. (2023). Assessment literacy and students’ understanding of success criteria in U.S. high schools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(4), 389–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sotho, P. (2025). The influence of clear success criteria on learners’ understanding and performance in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Journal of Education, 29(1), 56–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Uganda National Examinations Board. (2025). UACE and UCE national examination performance report. UNEB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Urdan, T. (2004). Learner perceptions of learning objectives and success criteria in the classroom: An observational study. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 305–327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wambua, J. M. (2024). Formative assessment practices and self-regulated learning among high-achieving students in Kenyan secondary schools. Journal of Educational Psychology in Africa, 5(1), 21–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Watson, L. E. (2024). Clarifying learning intentions: The role of formative assessment in improving student performance. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 82(1), 36–54. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Utilization of Resources for the Implementation of Early Childhood Education and Care Curriculum in Pre-primary Schools
• Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards the Implementation of the New Curriculum
• Music Education and Cultural Heritage: Creative Practices Integrating Music and Identity
• The Role of Evidence-Based Dentistry in Shaping the Curriculum of Contemporary Dental Schools in the United States
• Curriculum Literacy as Cultural Capital: Parental Education and Support for Competence-Based Education in Public Primary and Junior Schools in Kajiado County, Kenya