Determinant Risk Factors for Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in Primary Health Care (PHC) Systems in Kogi State
Authors
DHPRS, Kogi State Primary Health Care Development Agency (KSPHCDA) (Nigeria)
Project Manager, Immunization Plus and Malaria Progress by Accelerating Coverage and transforming Services (IMPACT) (World Bank Project), Kogi State (Nigeria)
Project Manager, Hope-PHC, Kogi State Government House (Nigeria)
Lecturer II Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Informatics, Confluence University of Science and Technology, Osara Kogi State (Nigeria)
BHCPF Focal Person Kogi State Primary Health Care Development Agency (KSPHCDA) (Nigeria)
DDCI, Kogi State Primary Health Care Development Agency (KSPHCDA) (Nigeria)
M&E Officer, Kogi State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Lokoja (KSPHCDA) (Nigeria)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-13
Accepted: 2025-12-20
Published: 2026-01-21
Abstract
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is a systems-based, Kaizen-inspired approach that strengthens Primary Health Care (PHC) through iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, routine data use, and stakeholder engagement. In Kogi State, Nigeria, a cross-sectional mixed-methods assessment of n=96 PHC facilities applied epidemiologic and implementation science methods to identify determinant risk factors for CQI performance. Data sources included IMPACT RISS supervision reports, DHIS2 extracts, and program documents (2023–2025), analyzed using chi-square tests, Pearson correlations, logistic regression, multilevel mixed-effects models, and MANOVA.
Facility readiness was operationalized as a composite index of WASH, power, and cold-chain infrastructure was strongly correlated with immunization coverage (r = 0.62), and each 10-point increase in readiness raised the odds of high CQI uptake by ~35% (aOR ≈ 1.35). Cold-chain failure nearly doubled zero-dose risk (RR ≈ 1.90; aOR ≈ 1.8), functioning as a critical control point in the CQI pathway. Workforce stability, proxied by staff accommodation, was associated with a two-fold increase in CQI uptake (aOR ≈ 2.05), reinforcing its role as a sustaining factor. Process innovations such as geo-tagged supervision (aOR ≈ 1.6) and settlement-level monitoring emerged as mediators that translated readiness into improved service delivery. Environmental risk (aOR ≈ 0.70) and LGA-level clustering (ICC ≈ 0.16) moderated CQI effectiveness, highlighting the importance of context in shaping outcomes.
These findings support a causal logic in which structural readiness enables process improvements, workforce stability sustains gains, and socio-ecological alignment enhances resilience. The study’s Theory of Change posits that CQI success is conditional on the interaction between readiness, process fidelity, and contextual adaptation. Translating these coefficients into program targets such as cold-chain uptime, staff retention, and geo-tagged supervision coverage can guide scalable, equity-focused CQI strategies. Institutionalizing the data-to-action loop, embedding environmental risk into microplanning, and formalizing PDSA cycles at the facility level are essential for sustaining improvements. This study offers a replicable framework for implementing Kaizen-based CQI in PHC systems across similar low-resource settings.
Keywords
Kaizen; Continuous Quality Improvement
Downloads
References
1. Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria. National Quality Policy and Strategy: Situational Analysis 2024. Abuja: FMoH; 2024. https://www.health.gov.ng/ (FMoH publications portal) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Kogi State Primary Health Care Development Agency (KSPHCDA). Human Resources For Health Mapping and Gap Analysis. Lokoja: KSPHCDA; 2025. https://kogistate.gov.ng/wpcontent/uploads/The-KOGI-PHC-HRH-Mapping-Gap-Analysis-and-multi-Year-recruitment-andDeployment-Plan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. National Bureau of Statistics & UNICEF. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2023–24. Abuja: NBS; 2024. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. SBM Intelligence. Health Preparedness Index Report 2025. Lagos: SBM; 2025. https://www.sbmintel.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. World Health Organization; UNICEF. Primary Health Care Measurement Framework and Indicators. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/initiatives/monitoring-primary-health-care [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. SCEAP Project Partners. Community Engagement and Accountability in PHC Systems: Kogi State Report. Lokoja; 2025. https://www.sceapproject.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Adeyemi O, Musa J. 2025. Environmental health risks and PHC resilience in North-Central Nigeria. J Glob Health Epidemiol. 2025;7(2):45–59. https://journalofglobalhealthepidemiology.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ogah PO, Uguru N, Okeke C, Mohammed N, Ogbe O, Aina M. Primary health care in Nigeria: best practices and quality of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ogaji DS. 2024. Patient-Focused Quality Improvement in Primary Health Care. J Community Med Prim Health Care. 2024;29(2):84–96. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jcmphc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Yisa SS, Ogunniyi TJ, Dine RD. 2025, Strengthening primary health care in Nigeria: a means to achieve universal health coverage. BMJ Glob Health. 2025;10(10):e018486. https://gh.bmj.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. World Health Organization. Global Report on Primary Health Care: Resilience and Equity. Geneva: WHO; 2023. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. UNICEF. Immunization Roadmap 2024–2030: Equity and Zero Dose Strategy. New York: UNICEF; 2024. https://www.unicef.org/immunization [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. World Bank. Nigeria Human Capital Review: Health and Education Systems. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2023. https://www.worldbank.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. World Health Organization. Monitoring the Building Blocks of Health Systems: A Handbook of Indicators. Geneva: WHO; 2022. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. UNICEF Nigeria. Community Health and Immunization Report. Abuja: UNICEF Nigeria; 2024. https://www.unicef.org/nigeria [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA). Cold Chain and Logistics Assessment Report. Abuja: NPHCDA; 2024. https://www.nphcda.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria. Basic Health Care Provision Fund (BHCPF) Implementation Guidelines. Abuja; 2021. https://www.health.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. UNICEF. Zero-Dose Children and Missed Communities Report. New York: UNICEF; 2023. https://www.unicef.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. World Health Organization. Health Workforce Support and Retention Strategies in LMICs. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. World Health Organization. Donabedian Model in Practice: Structure, Process, Outcome in PHC. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. UNICEF. Community Governance and PHC Accountability Toolkit. New York: UNICEF; 2025. https://www.unicef.org/publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. World Health Organization. Environmental Determinants of Health: Flooding, Pollution, and Sanitation. Geneva: WHO; 2023. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA). Supportive Supervision Guidelines for PHC Systems. Abuja: NPHCDA; 2025. https://www.nphcda.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. World Health Organization. Digital Health and Data Integrity in PHC Systems. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. UNICEF. Vitamin A Supplementation Coverage Report. New York: UNICEF; 2024. https://www.unicef.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory Data Repository: Nigeria PHC Indicators. Geneva: WHO; 2023. https://www.who.int/data/gho [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. World Bank. Nigeria Service Delivery Indicators Report. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2024. https://www.worldbank.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. World Health Organization. Resilient Health Systems Post COVID-19. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. UNICEF. Maternal and Child Health Equity Report. New York: UNICEF; 2023. https://www.unicef.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease and PHC Systems. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. World Health Organization. Emergency Preparedness and Response in PHC Systems. Geneva: WHO; 2025. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. UNICEF Nigeria. Community Mobilization and PHC Engagement Report. Abuja: UNICEF Nigeria; 2025. https://www.unicef.org/nigeria [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. World Health Organization. Equity in Primary Health Care: Global Lessons for LMICs. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. World Health Organization. Universal Health Coverage in Africa: Progress and Challenges. Geneva: WHO; 2023. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. UNICEF. Child Survival and Development Report: Nigeria. New York: UNICEF; 2024. https://www.unicef.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. World Health Organization. PHC Financing and Sustainability in LMICs. Geneva: WHO; 2024. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. African Development Bank. Nigeria Health Infrastructure Investment Report. Abidjan: AfDB; 2024. https://www.afdb.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. World Health Organization. Community Health Worker Retention Strategies. Geneva: WHO; 2023. https://www.who.int/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. UNICEF. Nutrition and Immunization Integration Report. New York: UNICEF; 2025. https://www.unicef.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, et al. 2014. Systematic review of the application of continuous quality improvement in health care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(4):290–298. https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/23/4/290 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Donabedian A. 1996, Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166–203. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3348969 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. 2009. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Bossert TJ, Beauvais JC. 2002. Decentralization of health systems and its effects on governance and accountability in LMICs. Health Policy Plan. 2002;17 Suppl 1:1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Rifkin SB. 2014, Community participation and health systems: evidence and implications. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29 Suppl 2:ii54–ii61. https://academic.oup.com/heapol [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. World Health Organization; UNICEF. Immunization Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy 2021–2030. 2020. WHO/UNICEF. https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/strategies/ia2030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. World Health Organization; UNICEF. 2019 WASH in Health Care Facilities: Global Baseline Report 2019. 2019. WHO/UNICEF. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241515524 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). Science of Improvement: Model for Improvement and PDSA Cycles. IHI resources and how-to guides. https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Langley GJ, Moen R, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. 2009. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance. 2nd ed. JosseyBass; 2009. https://www.wiley.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. University of Oslo HISP (DHIS2). 2025, DHIS2 Documentation and Implementation Guides. DHIS2/HISP. https://www.dhis2.org/documentation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. World Health Organization. Data Quality Review (DQR) Toolkit (Modules 1–5). 2017 (and updates). WHO. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/tools_data_analysis/dqr/en/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. World Health Organization. Effective Vaccine Management (EVM) Initiative: Tools and Guidance. WHO. https://www.who.int/initiatives/effective-vaccine-management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. UNICEF Supply Division. Cold Chain and Vaccine Logistics Guidance for Immunization Programmes. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/supply/cold-chain [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; WHO; UNICEF. 2025 Operational guidance and technical briefs on reaching zero-dose children and missed communities (IA2030 operational materials). https://www.gavi.org/; https://www.unicef.org/immunization [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Federal Ministry of Health / National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Nigeria. 2025 National immunization and PHC operational guidance and microplanning templates. https://www.nphcda.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC). 2025 Surveillance and outbreak response guidance; routine immunization surveillance integration. https://ncdc.gov.ng/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Python Software Foundation. (2025). Python language reference, version 3.12. https://www.python.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Gozzi, N., Chinazzi, et al. (2025). Epydemix: An open-source Python package for epidemic modeling with integrated approximate Bayesian calibration. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.07.25327151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Zivich, P. (2023). Python for Epidemiologists: A tutorial series and epidemiologic analysis toolkit. GitHub. https://github.com/pzivich/Python-for-Epidemiologists (github.com in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022). Using Python for public health data analysis and visualization. CDC Data Modernization Initiative. https://www.cdc.gov/dmi/tools/python.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. World Health Organization. (2023). Digital tools for health system strengthening: Python-based analytics in LMICs. WHO Digital Health Technical Brief Series. 1.] Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. McKinney, W. (2017). Python for Data Analysis: Data wrangling with pandas, NumPy, and IPython (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. VanderPlas, J. (2016). Python Data Science Handbook: Essential tools for working with data. O’Reilly Media. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Wesolowski, A., Buckee, et al. (2016). Connecting mobility to infectious diseases: The promise and limits of mobile phone data. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 214(suppl_4), S414–S420. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw273 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Oliphant, T. E. (2007). Python for scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.58 (doi.org in Bing) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Migrant Health in Morocco: Between Law and Reality
- CaknaMinda: An Educator-Centred Mobile App for Early Screening of Mental Health and Schizophrenia Risks
- Health System and Nursing Strategies for Enhancing Male Participation in Family Planning: Evidence from Tema General Hospital, Ghana.
- From Īśvara-Praṇidhāna to Parā-Bhakti: Convergent Paths of Aṣṭāṅga Yoga and Bhakti Yoga
- Evidence-Based Psycho-Oncological Interventions: A Multimodal Approach to Supportive Care