Diagnostic Accuracy of Methylene Blue as a Counterstain For LED Fluorescence Microscopy in The Detection of Acid-Fast Bacilli: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Authors

Wina Mutende

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Mwenya Jonathan

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Alan Musunsa

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

James Mukamwembo

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Nyirenda Wilson

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Esther Kalito Nyendwa

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Beene Muleza Manchishi

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Jonathan Simpemba

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

John Muzyamba

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Kasamba Ng’andu

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Phenister Mwale

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Wenga Namutowe

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

David Kajoba Mumena

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Phiri Faliton

National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000188

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 2567-2577

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-24

Accepted: 2026-07-29

Published: 2026-08-06

Abstract

Objectives
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and agreement of methylene blue as a secondary counterstain for auramine O-based light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescence microscopy in the detection and grading of acid-fast bacilli in sputum specimens.
Methods
A prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the Chest Diseases Laboratory, Lusaka, Zambia, between 6 January and 28 March 2026. The study included 20 direct sputum specimens, 20 concentrated sputum specimens processed using the 4% N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide method, and 20 proficiency testing slides from the 2025 Round B external quality assessment programme. 2 smears were prepared from each specimen and stained with auramine O followed by either 0.3% methylene blue (index test) or 0.1% potassium permanganate (reference method). The primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement between methylene blue and potassium permanganate for acid-fast bacilli detection and grading.
Results
Compared with potassium permanganate staining, methylene blue demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity across all specimen categories. For concentrated sputum specimens, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 78.2% to 100%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 47.8% to 100%). For direct sputum specimens, sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 66.4% to 100%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 71.5% to 100%). Among PT slides, sensitivity and specificity were both 100% (95% CI 69.2% to 100%). Agreement between staining methods was complete across specimen categories (Cohen’s κ=1.0). Among positive smears, grading agreement within one grade was observed for all specimen types, with exact grading agreement of 66.7% for concentrated sputum, 88.9% for direct sputum and 100% for PT slides.
Conclusions
Methylene blue demonstrated excellent diagnostic agreement with potassium permanganate when used as a counterstain for auramine O LED fluorescence microscopy.

Keywords

Tuberculosis, acid-fast bacilli, fluorescence microscopy, diagnostic accuracy, methylene blue

Downloads

References

1. Chandra, T. J., Selvaraj, R., & Sharma, Y. V. (2015). Same day sputum smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: Ziehl-Neelsen versus fluorescent staining. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(4), 525–528. doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.174273 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2014). Evaluation of precision of quantitative measurement procedures (3rd ed., CLSI document EP05-A3). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Forbes, B. A., Hall, G. S., Miller, M. B., Novak, S. M., Rowlinson, M. C., Salfinger, M., Somoskövi, A., Warshauer, D. M., & Wilson, M. L. (2018). Practice guidelines for clinical microbiology laboratories: Mycobacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 31(2), e00038-17. doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00038-17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hooja, S., Pal, N., Malhotra, B., Goyal, S., Kumar, V., & Vyas, L. (2011). Comparison of Ziehl-Neelsen and Auramine O staining methods on direct and concentrated smears in clinical specimens. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis, 58(2), 72-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Steingart, K. R., Henry, M., Ng, V., Hopewell, P. C., Ramsay, A., Cunningham, J., Urbanczik, R., Perkins, M., Aziz, M. A., & Pai, M. (2006). Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: A systematic review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 6(9), 570–581. doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70578-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. World Health Organization. (2011). Fluorescent light-emitting diode (LED) microscopy for diagnosis of tuberculosis: Policy statement. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO operational handbook on tuberculosis. Module 3: Diagnosis-Rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. World Health Organization. (2025). Global tuberculosis report 2025. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles