Digital Pragmatics and Meaning-Making in Online Communication: Rethinking Context, Intent, and Interpretation
Authors
Cyril Abioye Charles OLOWOYEYE
Department of Arts Education, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Ikere-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000055
Subject Category: Communication
Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 606-616
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-25
Accepted: 2026-04-30
Published: 2026-05-27
Abstract
The expansion of digitally mediated communication has significantly transformed how meaning is constructed, negotiated, and interpreted. This paper argues that classical pragmatic frameworks, largely developed for face-to-face interaction, are insufficient for explaining communication in contemporary digital environments such as WhatsApp, X, and TikTok. Drawing on digital discourse studies and pragmatic theory, the paper reconceptualises context, speaker intention, and interpretation as dynamic, multimodal, and technologically mediated processes. Using illustrative examples from Nigerian and global online interactions, it demonstrates how emojis, memes, silence, and algorithmic systems function as pragmatic resources. The paper proposes an integrative model of digital pragmatics that foregrounds platform affordances, sociocultural knowledge, and distributed audiences. The study contributes to ongoing debates in pragmatics, digital linguistics, and language pedagogy by offering a framework for understanding meaning-making in digitally networked communication.
Keywords
digital pragmatics, multimodality, online discourse, implicature
Downloads
References
1. Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Computer-mediated communication and linguistic landscapes. In C. Leung & B. Street (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English studies (pp. 74–90). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Androutsopoulos, J. (2020). Data and methods in computer-mediated discourse analysis. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 206–224). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review, 26(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307311611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Georgakopoulou, A., & Spilioti, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Herring, S. C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen & A. M. Tester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 1–25). Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Herring, S. C. (2018). The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In J. Jones, R. Chik, & C. Hafner (Eds.), Discourse and digital practices (pp. 25–37). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (2015). Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Varis, P., & Blommaert, J. (2015). Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures. Multilingual Margins, 2(1), 31–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
- An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
- Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
- Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
- (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication