Diurnal Variation of Solar Radiation, Ambient Temperature, Panel Temperature and Relative Humidity across some selected locations in Nigeria.
Authors
Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1304000264
Subject Category: Temperature
Volume/Issue: 13/4 | Page No: 3108-3122
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-24
Accepted: 2026-04-28
Published: 2026-05-20
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of the diurnal variation of solar radiation, ambient temperature, panel temperature, and relative humidity across selected locations in Nigeria. The objective is to examine how these environmental parameters influence photovoltaic (PV) module performance from both an experimental and solid-state physics perspective. Photovoltaic energy conversion is fundamentally governed by semiconductor processes within a p–n junction, where incident photons with energy hν≥E_ggenerate electron–hole pairs. The efficiency of charge carrier separation and transport is strongly influenced by temperature-dependent parameters such as carrier mobility, intrinsic carrier concentration, and recombination rates. Consequently, environmental variables introduce dynamic operating conditions that directly affect PV output. The results obtained from the locations exhibit a consistent diurnal pattern, with solar radiation increasing from near-zero values in the early morning to peak values ranging between approximately 900–1400 W/m² around midday (12:00–14:00 hrs), followed by a gradual decline toward evening. Correspondingly, both ambient and panel temperatures increase with solar irradiance, with panel temperatures consistently exceeding ambient temperatures by several degrees due to heat accumulation and limited convective cooling. Peak panel temperatures were observed in the range above 40°C, depending on location and module type. Relative humidity showed an inverse relationship with solar radiation and temperature, decreasing during peak irradiance periods and increasing during early morning and late evening hours. This behavior is attributed to atmospheric thermodynamics, where increased temperature reduces relative humidity through enhanced evaporation and air expansion. From a solid-state standpoint, the elevated panel temperatures observed across all locations contribute to a reduction in PV efficiency through increased carrier recombination and reduced open-circuit voltage. Comparative analysis of the different locations reveals notable spatial variations in peak irradiance and thermal behavior, reflecting the influence of local climatic conditions such as cloud cover, humidity levels, and atmospheric clarity. Inland and high-radiation locations exhibited sharper irradiance peaks and higher panel temperatures, while more humid regions showed moderated irradiance profiles and relatively lower thermal gradients. The findings highlight the critical interplay between environmental conditions and semiconductor physics in determining PV performance. The results emphasize that while high solar irradiance enhances photocurrent generation, excessive thermal loading reduces efficiency, thereby necessitating careful consideration of location-specific conditions in PV system design and deployment. This study provides valuable empirical data for optimizing photovoltaic systems in tropical environments and contributes to a deeper understanding of how diurnal environmental variations influence solid-state device performance in real-world applications.
Keywords
Photovoltaic (PV) modules; Diurnal variation; Solar radiation; Ambient temperature; Panel temperature; Relative humidity.
Downloads
References
1. Aqachmar, Z., Bouhal, T., & Lahrech, K. (2020). Energetic, economic, and environmental (3 E) performances of high concentrated photovoltaic large scale installations: Focus on spatial analysis of Morocco. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(18), 10840-10861. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Davies, R. L., & Gentry, F. E. (2005). Control of electric field at the surface of pn junctions. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 11(7), 313-323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Gayen, D., Chatterjee, R., & Roy, S. (2024). A review on environmental impacts of renewable energy for sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(5), 5285-5310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fahrenbruch, A., & Bube, R. (2012). Fundamentals of solar cells: photovoltaic solar energy conversion. Elsevier. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Okojokwu-du, J. O., Abioye, R. F., Ihwughwavwe, S. I., Enow, O. F., Okereke, M., Filani, O. M., ... & Nnabueze, S. B. (2025). Balancing Fossil Fuels and Renewables: Pathways for a Just and Sustainable Energy Transition in Africa. Int J Multidiscip Res Growth Eval, 6(5), 409-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Okonkwo, G. N., & Nwokoye, A. O. C. (2014). Estimating global solar radiation from temperature data in Minna location. European Scientific Journal, 10(15). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Pindado, S., & Cubas, J. (2017). Simple mathematical approach to solar cell/panel behavior based on datasheet information. Renewable energy, 103, 729-738. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Shen, L., Li, Z., & Ma, T. (2020). Analysis of the power loss and quantification of the energy distribution in PV module. Applied Energy, 260, 114333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Singh, V., Rayal, I., Sharma, H., Dwivedi, C., & Singh, B. (2020). Solar radiation and light materials interaction. In Energy saving coating materials (pp. 1-32). Elsevier [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Smith, A. M., & Nie, S. (2010). Semiconductor nanocrystals: structure, properties, and band gap engineering. Accounts of chemical research, 43(2), 190-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Tsakalakos, L. (2010). Introduction to photovoltaic physics, applications, and technologies. In Nanotechnology for photovoltaics (pp. 19-66). CRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Umar, N. H., Bora, B., Banerjee, C., Gupta, P., & Anjum, N. (2021). Performance and economic viability of the PV system in different climatic zones of Nigeria. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 43, 100987. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Yakubu, R. O., Mensah, L. D., Quansah, D. A., Adaramola, M. S., & Hammed, Y. (2022). Performance evaluation of bifacial solar PV modules under different climatic regions in Nigeria. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 354, p. 02006). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]