EduActive: Designing an Interactive and Gamified Learning Platform for Early Learners
Authors
Department of Bachelor of Science in Information Technology, Jesus Reigns Christian College (Philippines)
Department of Bachelor of Science in Information Technology, Jesus Reigns Christian College (Philippines)
Department of Bachelor of Science in Information Technology, Jesus Reigns Christian College (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000219
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 2408-2419
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-20
Accepted: 2026-05-25
Published: 2026-06-10
Abstract
The growing reliance on technology in education has created persistent gaps, particularly for early learners and students with visual impairments who remain underserved by existing e-learning platforms. Common challenges include limited subject coverage, lack of engaging content, poor accessibility, and overly complex interfaces that overwhelm young users. This study addresses these concerns through the development of EduActive, an AI-powered interactive and gamified e-learning platform designed specifically for early learners. The platform was developed with three primary objectives: (1) to implement an AI-driven voice command system that reduces reliance on guardian assistance for visually impaired students when navigating and engaging with the platform; (2) to incorporate gamification elements including badges, points, and streak tracking that transform lessons into motivating and enjoyable experiences; and (3) to provide a broad yet age-appropriate range of subjects that build a strong educational foundation for young learners. This study employed a developmental research design combined with an Agile-based methodology, allowing iterative cycles of planning, design, development, testing, and evaluation. The system was built using React.js for the frontend, Node.js with Express.js for backend operations, and SQLite for database management, with Firebase handling user authentication and session control. The Web Speech API and Speech Synthesis API were integrated to power the platform's voice command and text-to-speech features without relying on third-party services. The platform covers core subjects including Mathematics, Science, English, and Filipino, each featuring animated lesson content and structured quizzes. Evaluation conducted in a controlled environment involving early learners and their guardians demonstrated that the platform's voice command and text-to-speech features significantly reduced the level of guardian assistance required for visually impaired students to navigate and interact with the system. Gamification elements positively influenced learner engagement and motivation, while the subject variety supported a well-rounded early learning experience. The findings affirm that EduActive presents a viable and inclusive model for early childhood digital education, offering a practical approach to minimizing accessibility barriers for visually impaired learners in developing-country contexts.
Keywords
e-learning, gamification, voice navigation, accessibility, early learners
Downloads
References
1. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 3–31). Athabasca University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alsubhi, M. A., Sahari, N., & Wook, T. T. (2020). A study of gamification elements for e-learning platforms. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(3), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bagarinao, R. T. (2015). Navigational patterns of learners in an online course in Science, Technology, and Society. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bandalaria, M. D. P. (2009). E-learning in the Philippines: Trends, directions, and challenges. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(4), 495–510. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., & Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Agile Alliance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Benito, O. P., et al. (2024). Factors influencing the acceptance of eLearning platforms in medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cambronero, P. P., R., B., Jr. (2018). Development of an e-learning system for graduate programs. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 9(2), 120–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Caraig, G. A., et al. (2020). Evaluation of e-learning resources and mobile technology integration among elementary education students in Batangas. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Perspectives, 7(1), 34–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Casillano, N. F. B. (2020). Challenges of internet connectivity and e-learning in Eastern Samar. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 4(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dela Cruz, R. A. (2023). Online learning and student adaptation in the Philippines during COVID-19. Philippine Journal of Education, 98(2), 67–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Diesto, B. R. D., & Mañago, A. M. N. (2024). Development of an interactive game for foreign language learners using Agile methodology. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Duterte, J. P. (2024). Educational gamification and student engagement in higher education. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 29(1), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Eugenio, D., Sawi, K. J., & Sagud, R. (2024). Online cohort educational models and learning support systems in Philippine higher education. Journal of Distance Education Philippines, 12(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Garcia, M. (2017). E-learning technology adoption in the Philippines: An investigation of factors affecting Filipino college students' acceptance of learning management systems. International Journal of E-Learning and Educational Technologies in the Digital Media, 3(3), 118–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Gligorea, I., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence and adaptive learning systems in educational platforms: Benefits and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4561–4583. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Jemni, M., Laabidi, M., & Ben Ayed, L. (2014). Accessible e-learning for students with disabilities. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design (pp. 45–63). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Agamba, J. (2014). Promoting effective e-learning practices through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 253–269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Laranas, J. S., Apam, B., & Serrano, E. P. (2022). Acceptability of e-learning platforms for agriculture researchers and scientists in the Philippines. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28(3), 211–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Mahajan, D. (2024). LearnIt: An educational system for identifying and supporting slow learners using MERN stack technologies. International Journal of Advanced Educational Systems, 11(1), 25–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Maaliw, R. R. (2020). Adaptive learning personalization in e-learning systems. Philippine Journal of Information Technology Research, 15(2), 89–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Muthuprasad, T., Aiswarya, S., Aditya, K. S., & Jha, G. K. (2021). Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Nand, K., Baghaei, N., Casey, J., et al. (2019). Engaging children with educational gamification for numeracy learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1189–1210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Peña-Bandalaria, M. M. D. (2009). Mobile learning and bridging the digital divide in Philippine education. University of the Philippines Open University Journal, 5(1), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Skiada, R., et al. (2014). EasyLexia: A mobile application for children with learning difficulties. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Tokarieva, A., & Chyzhykova, I. (2022). Educators’ experiences with gamified learning applications in digital pedagogy. Educational Technology Quarterly, 2022(4), 425–442. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Zainuddin, Z., et al. (2019). Gamified e-quizzes and learner engagement in science education. Computers & Education, 142, 103638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar