Effect of a One-Day Gender Equality, Nutrition and POSH Act Seminar on Knowledge among College Students

Authors

Dr. Kirti D. Thakar

Professor, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University (VNSGU), Surat, Gujarat (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1310000012

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 165-173

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-11

Accepted: 2026-10-16

Published: 2026-10-29

Abstract

Targeted institutional educational interventions serve as a primary vehicle for enhancing statutory awareness and health literacy among higher education cohorts. This investigation examined the cognitive, attitudinal, and longitudinal outcomes of an intensive, single-day seminar addressing statutory protections under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act), nutritional well-being, and gender equity. Administered at Veer Narmad South Gujarat University (VNSGU), Surat, under the SETU initiative in collaboration with the Department of Women and Child Development, Government of Gujarat, and supported by the Gender Resource Centre (GRC), Gandhinagar, the intervention evaluated 213 enrolled undergraduate and postgraduate students. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent pre-test/post-test control group architecture was adopted (experimental group N = 213; non-participating control group N = 85). Assessment utilized a 15-item dichotomous diagnostic inventory exhibiting robust internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.81 at baseline, 0.79 at immediate conclusion), complemented by psychometrically sound scales evaluating formal reporting willingness and patriarchal role attitudes. Participants demonstrated marked cognitive gains, with group mean knowledge elevating from 5.80 (SD = 1.85) to 14.74 (SD = 0.65) out of 15 possible marks (t(212) = 35.12, p < .001, Cohen’s h = 1.53), reflecting a normalized learning gain of g = 0.97. Every individual assessment item registered statistically significant improvement (z values spanning 11.90 to 14.32, p < .001), while the matched control section exhibited no measurable variation over an identical testing interval. Longitudinal follow-up assessment administered after six weeks (N = 75) confirmed an enduring retention quotient of 90.6% (mean = 13.90, SD = 0.82). Integrating the conceptual models of Bandura, Ajzen, and Kirkpatrick, these empirical outcomes affirm that comprehensive multi-thematic workshops substantially bolster legal understanding and institutional confidence, while highlighting the imperative of cultivating an accountable campus organizational culture.

Keywords

POSH Act, gender equality, nutrition, college students, quasi-experimental design, knowledge gain, SETU Programme, theory of planned behaviour

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bingham, S. G., & Scherer, L. L. (2001). The unexpected effects of a sexual harassment educational program. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(2), 125–153. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Bruce, C., & Thomas, G. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Association of American Universities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Government of India. (2013). The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (Act No. 14 of 2013). Gazette of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Institute for Population Sciences & ICF. (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India. IIPS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2), 153–157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Field, M. P. (2009). Sexual harassment training: Recommendations to address gaps between the practitioner and research literatures. Human Resource Management, 48(5), 817–837. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Roehling, M. V., & Huang, J. (2018). Sexual harassment training effectiveness: An interdisciplinary review and call for research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 134–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Tinkler, J. E., Li, Y. E., & Mollborn, S. (2007). Can legal interventions change beliefs? The effect of exposure to sexual harassment policy on men's gender beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(4), 480–494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. University Grants Commission. (2015). UGC (Prevention, prohibition and redressal of sexual harassment of women employees and students in higher educational institutions) Regulations, 2015. Gazette of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles