Effect of ChatGPT on the Academic Performance of Chemistry Students in Thermodynamics: A Case Study of Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo

Authors

Bolarinwa, O. T.

Chemistry Department, Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Oyo State (Nigeria)

Abubakar A.

Chemistry Department, Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Oyo State (Nigeria)

Oluwatuberu, A. O.

Chemistry Department, Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Oyo State (Nigeria)

Akintokun O. A.

Integrated Science Department, Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Oyo State (Nigeria)

Ogungbile, D. O.

Integrated Science Department, Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo, Oyo State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000111

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 1183-1191

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-12

Accepted: 2026-03-18

Published: 2026-04-04

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of ChatGPT on the academic performance, attitudes, and perceptions of students studying thermodynamics at the Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo. A quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test control group measurements was adopted. One hundred and twenty NCE III students were selected using purposive sampling, with half assigned to the experimental group and the rest to the control group. The experimental group was taught using ChatGPT, and the control group was taught using traditional pedagogical methods. Three data collection tools were used: The Thermodynamics Achievement Test (TAT), the Attitude Towards ChatGPT Usage Questionnaire (ATCUQ), and the Perceived Effectiveness of ChatGPT Questionnaire (PECQ). Then the data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. Results showed that students maintained a positive attitude toward using ChatGPT, as they felt it was an entertaining, confidence-boosting, and efficient learning tool. The perception metrics also showed that most participants considered ChatGPT a supportive, interactive, and interesting platform that supplements learning and academic achievement in thermodynamics. There was no significant difference in pre-test scores between the groups (p = 0.834, p > 0.05), indicating baseline equivalence. On the other hand, a statistically significant difference was observed in the post-test gain score (p = 0.000, p<0.05), with the experimental group (34.00) scoring higher than the control group (26.10). The study concludes that integrating ChatGPT into chemistry education has a significant positive effect on students' understanding and achievement in thermodynamics. It was suggested that AI-driven tools should be integrated into science education, alongside teacher training and improved digital infrastructure.

Keywords

ChatGPT, Thermodynamics, Chemistry Education

Downloads

References

1. Almogren, A. S., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Dahri, N. A. (2024). Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: A smart education perspective. Heliyon, 10(11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Araújo, J. L., & Saúde, I. (2024). Can ChatGPT enhance chemistry laboratory teaching? Using prompt engineering to enable AI in generating laboratory activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1858-1864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Babalola, V. T., Ahmad, S. S., & Tafida, H. S. (2024). ChatGPT in Organic Chemistry Classrooms: Analyzing the Impacts of Social Environment on Students’ Interest, Critical Thinking and Academic Achievement. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 3(1), 60-72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bettayeb, A. M., Abu Talib, M., Sobhe Altayasinah, A. Z., & Dakalbab, F. (2024, July). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT: conversational AI in education. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1379796). Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boesdorfer, S. B. (2019). Advancing Professional Knowledge and Skills for Chemistry Teaching through an Online Master’s Degree for Secondary-Level Chemistry Teachers. In Best Practices in Chemistry Teacher Education (pp. 53-66). American Chemical Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bradford, A., & Hamer, A. (2022). Science and the scientific method: Definitions and examples. Published January, 17, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dimeli, M., & Kostas, A. (2025). The role of ChatGPT in education: Applications, challenges, and insights from a systematic review. Journal of Information Technology Education. Research, 24, 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Duchaeva, R., & Magomadov, S. (2023). Current Environmental Problems and their Solutions with the Help of New Technologies. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 63, p. 07012). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fergus, S., Botha, M., & Ostovar, M. (2023). Evaluating academic answers generated using ChatGPT. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1672-1675. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ganesan, S., Padmapriya, G., & De Zoysa, A. S. A. (2024). Conscientiousness of environmental concepts in sustainable development and ecological conservation. Physical Sciences Reviews, 9(1), 227-234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences, 3(2), 220-227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Isinkaye, K. A. (2023). The Impact of Scientific and Technological Innovations on International Relations in the Age of Globalization. NIU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(4), 51-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Klayklung, P., Chocksathaporn, P., Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., & Jangjarat, K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with ChatGPT: Enhancing learning through conversational AI. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2 (3):217-225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kodkin, V. L., & Artem’eva, E. V. (2024). ChatGPT: Application in chemistry education and challenges. Journal of Computer and Communications, 12(3), 196-206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Luo, H. (2021). Working together to address global issues: Science and technology and sustainable development. Cultures of Science, 4(1), 3-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rojas, A. J. (2024). An investigation into ChatGPT’s application for a scientific writing assignment. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1959-1965. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wang, J. & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, 621. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles