Effectiveness of Community Fire Auxiliary Group (CFAG) Mechanism in Community Fire Safety Preparedness: An Assessment in Municipality of Rizal, Laguna

Authors

John Carlo H. Sikat

Faculty of the Graduate Studies and Applied Research,College of Business, Administration, and Accountancy Laguna State Polytechnic University Santa Cruz Main Campus Degree Master in Public Administration (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1305000156

Subject Category: Public Administration

Volume/Issue: 13/5 | Page No: 1693-1734

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-30

Accepted: 2026-06-04

Published: 2026-06-05

Abstract

beings, but when it escapes control, it can be destructive. Fire incidents can pose a threat to a person's life, property, and even a country's economy. It usually leads to heavy financial losses and loss of human life. It is considered a negative event that has tangible costs in terms of human life and property.
In the Philippines, the Community Fire Auxiliary Group (CFAG) is essential to improving community preparedness and fire safety. CFAG is a volunteer-run organization made up of locals that supports firefighting efforts until professional fire services arrive, encourages fire prevention education, and facilitates early fire detection. Involving community members in fire safety initiatives, planning drills, and sharing crucial information on fire protocols promotes a culture of shared responsibility. By speeding up response times and lowering fire risks, the CFAG also helps the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) minimize casualties and property damage. By equipping locals with the knowledge and skills to respond effectively to fire emergencies, CFAGs significantly increase community resilience despite obstacles such as limited resources and funding, ultimately making the community safer and better prepared for disasters.
Communities still face significant risks from fire incidents, which can cause property damage, injuries, and environmental damage. To enhance fire prevention, early detection, and emergency response at the local level, community-based fire safety groups like the Community Fire Auxiliary Group (CFAG) have been created in partnership with the Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP). Despite their widespread presence, there is limited data to evaluate how well CFAGs improve fire safety and reduce fires in surrounding communities. CFAGs provide rapid response during fire emergencies, helping to limit damage until professional firefighters arrive. Additionally, CFAGs educate residents on safety measures and preparedness to prevent fires from occurring.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the CFAG mechanism in the Municipality of Rizal, Laguna, focusing on the group's ability to promote community involvement, accelerate fire incident response, and support fire prevention education. It also examines CFAG members' readiness through training and resource availability. Understanding these elements is essential to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the CFAG system and to suggest improvements that will enhance residents' fire safety resilience.

Keywords

Community, Fire ,Auxiliary ,Group ,Mechanism , Community

Downloads

References

1. Almeida & Queirós (2020). Evacuation Drill Performance and Evacuation Time Reduction in Public Buildings: An Experimental Study” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baguio Midland Courier. (2020). CFAG initiatives enhance fire safety awareness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bureau of Fire Protection. (2022). Community Fire Auxiliary Groups enhance local firefighting efforts. Philippine News Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bureau of Fire Protection. (2020). BFP strengthens fire prevention drive; forms fire auxiliaries in every purok. Philippine Information Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. BFP (2019). Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (RIRR) of RA 9514 “The Fire Code of the Philippines”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. BFP. (2023). Community Fire Auxiliary Groups: Enhancing local firefighting capabilities. Philippine News Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Coulthard, C. (2018). High-Rise Firefighting: Firefighter Preparedness to Life-Safety Vulnerabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Royal Roads University (Canada)) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Flora, L. C. (2024). Community fire response systems: The case of CFAG implementation in Northern Luzon. Journal of Philippine Public Safety and Preparedness, 10(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Florentin, K. M., Onuki, M., Esteban, M., Valenzuela, V. P., Paterno, M. C., Akpedonu, E., ... &Garciano, L. (2022). Implementing a Pre‐disaster Recovery Workshop in Intramuros, Manila, Philippines: lessons for disaster risk assessment, response, and recovery for cultural heritage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Guadalquiver, N. (2023, March 18). More community fire brigades eyed in Bacolod City. Philippine News Agency. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guevara, A. D. (2025). Essentials of fire safety: Community approaches and national frameworks. Journal of Disaster Science and Resilience, 5(1), 33-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hozjan, T., Kempna, K., & Smolka, J. (2020). Simulation and Modelling in Fire Safety: Virtual Reality for Smart Firefighting. In Safety and Security Issues in Technical Infrastructures (pp. 232-262). IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jaldell & Sund (2021). The Impact of Evacuation Training on Reaction Time and Casualty Reduction in Fire Emergencies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jolly, W., Freeborn, P., Page, W., & Butler, B. (2019). Severe Fire Danger Index: A forecastable metric to inform firefighter and community wildfire risk management. Fire, 2(3), 47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kapucu, N., Dougherty, R. B., & Hu, Q. (2022). Network governance for coordinated disaster response. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 309–333. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lee, C. C., Lim, H. S., Donghwi (Josh) Seo, & Dong-Heon, A. K. (2022). Examining employee retention and motivation: the moderating effect of employee generation. Evidence-Based HRM, 10(4), 385–402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Journal Articles & Periodicals [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience: A framework for understanding the role of social networks in disaster recovery Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 12(2), 1-24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Becker, M., & Natalier, K. (2020). Reinvestment strategies for juvenile firesetting: A community-based approach. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 9(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Flora, L. C. (2025). Community fire response systems: The case of CFAG implementation in Norther Luzon. Journal of Philippine Public Safety and Preparedness, 10(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kurata, Y. B., et al. (2023). Determining factors affecting perceived effectiveness among Filipinos for fire prevention preparedness in the National Capital Region, Philippines: Integrating protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Madriaga, R. P. (2024). Evaluating the Oplan Ligtas na Pamayanan program in Baguio City: Gains, gaps, and recommendations. Philippine Journal of Community Safety, 11(1), 60-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Penney, G., Smith, G., Ridge, S., &Cattani, M. (2022). A Review of the Standard of Care Owed to Australian Firefighters from a Safety Perspective— The Differences between Academic Theory and Legal Obligations. Fire, 5(3), 73. Retrieved on May 19, 2024 from: https://www.mdpi.com/2571- 6255/5/3/73 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Phan Tan, L., & Pham Xuan, L. (2024). Examining the effect of a supportive work environment on volunteer retention: Job embeddedness as a mediator. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2024.2312129 C. PUBLISHED & UNPUBLISHED [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gilbert, G., Turner, M., & Holdsworth, S. (2021). Understanding volunteer commitment to a project: Testing a conceptual model. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(6), 1406–1421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hui, L., Wang, K. M., Chen, Y. H., & Hung, F. Y. (2018). Simulation analysis of the search effectiveness on information-based firefighting. International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing, 3(1), 20-33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lagata, L. S., Andujar, C. J., Lantaco, E. L. S., Manuales, K. C. A., Allanic, E. A., & Cuevas Jr, J. F. (2022). Challenges Encountered and Insights of the Bureau of Fire Protection Personnel Towards Responding Fire Incident. Mediterranean Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (MJBAS), 6(2), 103-117. Retrieved on May 19, 2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Lapada, A. (2022). Disaster risk reduction knowledge among Filipino senior high school students. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 2, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v2i1.27 Madriaga, R. (2024). An assessment of the trained barangays of Baguio City Bureau of Fire Protection’s Oplan Ligtas na Pamayanan (OLP). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.513997 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Lim, J., & Moon, K. (2023). Exploring the effect of emotional labor on turnover intention and the moderating role of perceived organizational support: Evidence from Korean firefighters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles