“Effectiveness of Progressive Mobility Protocols in ICU Patients: A Controlled Study”

Background: Critically ill patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) often develop muscle weakness, reduced functional capacity, and prolonged immobilization, leading to delayed recovery. Early mobilization through structured progressive mobility protocols has been suggested to improve clinical and functional outcomes.
Aim:To evaluate the effectiveness of progressive mobility protocols on functional outcomes and clinical parameters in ICU patients.
Materials and Methods:A prospective controlled study was conducted on 30 ICU patients who were divided into experimental (n=15) and control (n=15) groups. The experimental group received a progressive mobility protocol, while the control group received conventional physiotherapy. Outcome measures included ICU Mobility Scale (IMS), MRC Muscle Strength Scale, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation were also recorded. Data were analyzed using paired and unpaired t-tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results:The experimental group showed significant improvement in functional mobility, muscle strength, and functional independence compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, a reduction in ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation was observed in the experimental group.
Conclusion: Progressive mobility protocols are effective in improving functional outcomes and reducing ICU-related complications. Their incorporation into routine ICU care can enhance patient recovery and overall clinical outcomes.

Progressive mobility, ICU rehabilitation, early mobilization, muscle strength, functional independence

1. Stevens RD, Marshall SA, Cornblath DR, et al. A framework for diagnosing and classifying intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10 Suppl):S299–308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Hermans G, Van den Berghe G. Clinical review: intensive care unit acquired weakness. Crit Care. 2015;19:274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, et al. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):2238–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1874–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hodgson CL, Stiller K, Needham DM, et al. Expert consensus and recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilization of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):658. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Tipping CJ, Harrold M, Holland A, et al. The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(2):171–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dubb R, Nydahl P, Hermes C, et al. Barriers and strategies for early mobilization of patients in intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(5):724–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Prevalence and Impact of Dietary Habits on Headache Incidence among College Students: A Survey-Based Study
• Rehabilitation of Patients With Low Back Pain in Hospitals in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
• “A Comparative Study to Find the Effects of Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide Versus Sub-Occipital Myofascial Release Techinique for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache.”
• Bridging the Gap Between Evidence and Practice: A Survey-Based Review of Physical Therapy Management for Diastasis Recti with Emphasis on Transverse Abdominis (TRA) Exercise in the Postpartum Period
• Knowledge and Using of Dry Needling by Physiotherapists in Central Africa in the Management of Trigger Points : The First Cross Sectional Survey in Cameroon