Effects of Emojis on Paralanguage in Social Media Communication among Students in Federal Polytechnics in South-South, Nigeria

This study examines the effects of emojis on paralanguage in social media communication among students in federal Polytechnics in South-South, Nigeria. With the rapid growth of digital interaction, emojis have become an essential element of online discourse, functioning as non-verbal cues that supplement written language. Five research questions and hypotheses were formulated to guide the study. This research used the Socio-Semiotic Perspective theory. This is an appropriate theoretical framework for this study because it comprehensively addresses the social and cultural dimensions of communication, crucial for understanding how meaning is constructed and negotiated through various semiotic resources, including emojis. Survey research design was used in the study. The area of the study was South-South, Nigeria. The study population was 10,788 ND 2 students from four federal Polytechnics in South-South, Nigeria out of which 381 was sampled using Krejcie and Morgan population and sample frame. A structured questionnaire known as “effects of emojis on paralanguage in social media communication among students Questionnaire (EEPSMCSQ)” was used in collecting data for the study. A pilot test was conducted using 30 students from a federal Polytechnic outside the main study area. The data generated was analyzed using dependent t-test analysis to answer the research questions and test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The result showed that emoji usage significantly affects paralanguage in social media communication. It revealed that emojis enhance message interpretation while excessive use negatively impacts grammatical accuracy, vocabulary development, and formal writing proficiency. The study concluded that while emojis improve clarity and emotional expression in informal contexts, their misuse can lead to misunderstandings and the transfer of informal habits into academic writing. It recommended among others that students should be educated on the appropriate use of emojis in informal as well as formal contexts.

Paralanguage, Social Media Communication

1. Alshenqeeti, H. (2016). Are emojis creating a new or old visual language for new a. generations? A socio-semiotic study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(6), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.6p.56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Baron, N. S. (2015). Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. a. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barr, D. J., & Gillon Dowens, M. (2019). Pragmatic inference and high-level a. construal. Psychological Review, 126(5), 750-769. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000152 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Danesi, M. (2017). The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the a. Age of the Internet. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474282024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Derakhshan, A., & Hamedi, M. (2020). The role of engagement in the adoption a. of an online language learning platform: An integrated ECT-UTAUT approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 248-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1694960 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer- a. mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: a. Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kaye, L. K., Wall, H. J., & Malone, S. A. (2016). “Turn that frown upside-down”: a. A contextual account of emoticon usage on different virtual platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 463-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kelly, R., & Watts, L. (2015). Characterizing the inventive appropriation of emoji a. as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 833-839. https://www.readkong.com/page/characterising-the-inventive-appropriation-of-emoji-as6686940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lu, X. (2019). L2 learners' use and perceptions of emojis in synchronous a. computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 28-47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Majid, F. A. A., Rahman, S. A. A., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). Emojis as a universal a. language? Exploring emoji usage and interpretation among Malaysian youth. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 65-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Miller, H., Kluver, D., Thebault-Spieker, J., Terveen, L., & Hecht, B. (2016). a. Understanding emoji ambiguity in context: The role of text in emoji-related miscommunication. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and social media, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14901 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Park, J., Baek, Y. M., & Cha, M. (2014). Cross-cultural comparison of nonverbal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. cues in emoticons on Twitter: Evidence from big data analysis. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 333354. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Riordan, M. A. (2017). Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect a. in text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 549-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17704238 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Stark, L., & Crawford, K. (2015). The conservatism of emoji: Work, affect, and a. communication. Social media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604853 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tagg, C. (2015). The language of social media: Identity and community on the a. internet. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tay, L., Parrigon, S., Huang, Q., & LeBreton, J. M. (2018). Graphical a. representation of meta-analyses with feedback and extension to conditional indirect effects. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 433-452. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117708136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Thurlow, C., & Brown, A. (2003). Generation Txt? The Sociolinguistics of Young a. People's Text-Messaging. Discourse Analysis Online. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wang, S., & Wen, Y. (2017). Can emoticons play a positive role in learning a. contexts? The influence of emoticons on high school students’ learning outcomes in the online forum. Computers & Education, 109, 112-124. SpringerLink [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zappavigna, M., & Logi, L. (2024). Emoji and Social Media Paralanguage. a. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009179829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Social Media and Ghanaian Youth: A Systematic Review of Impacts and Implications
• Social Media Trends and Public Opinion Dynamics in Port Harcourt
• The Impact of Social Media Information in Checkmating Social Injustice and Bad Governance in Nigeria
• The Impact of Image-Based Brand Content on Moroccan Consumers Engagement on Social Media
• Qur’anic Character Model in Enhancing the Quality of Job Satisfaction among the Civil Servants