Efficiency of Estimator of Probability Proportional to Size with and without Replacement

Authors

Faweya O.

Department of Statistics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Akinyemi O.

Department of Statistics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Ajayi T. A.

Department of Statistics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1303000167

Subject Category: Statistics

Volume/Issue: 13/3 | Page No: 2001-2015

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-12

Accepted: 2026-03-17

Published: 2026-04-11

Abstract

Efficiency refer to how well a sampling method extracts info from a population relative to effort /cost and method is efficient if it gives precise estimate with a small sample. Estimator is efficient if it has a low variance. This research focused on the efficiency of probability proportional to size sampling scheme estimators. Probability proportional to size with replacement, Hansen-Hurwitz estimator and Probability proportional to size without replacement, Rao-Hartley-Cochran estimator were compared in terms of estimation and efficiency. The empirical comparison of the population total, minimum variance and relative efficiency were used in assessing the efficiency. Probability proportional to size with replacement, (Hansen-Hurwitz) estimator had the higher population total estimate for some years indicating that population total differed by year. Probability proportional to size sampling without replacement estimator, (Rao–Hartley–Cochran) estimator thus had a smaller variance, hence more efficient performed better than the conventional Hansen–Hurwitz estimator in terms of variance reduction.

Keywords

Probability; Hansen-Hurwitz Estimator; Rao–Hartley–Cochran Estimator

Downloads

References

1. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Homa, Maurya, and Singh, 2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Horvitz, D. G., and Thompson, D. J. (1952). A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 663–685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Johnson, P., Smith, R., and Allen, B. (2015). The Horvitz-Thompson estimator in educational attainment studies. Educational Statistics Quarterly, 27(1), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hughes, A., and Bennett, K. (2025). The Rao-Hartley-Cochran (RHC) method’s efficiency in estimating unemployment disparities across different demographic groups. Economic Analysis and Policy Journal, 48(1), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. (Pamplona, 2019). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles