Engagement and Performance of Non-Teaching Personnel in Selected Elementary Schools in Cavite: Inputs to a Career Development Plan
Authors
Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science & Technology (EARIST-CAVITE) Graduate School- MBA Program (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000118
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 1610-1622
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-21
Accepted: 2026-07-26
Published: 2026-07-31
Abstract
Non-teaching personnel play a vital role in ensuring the effective delivery of educational services through administrative, financial, technical, and operational support. Their responsibilities have become increasingly significant following the implementation of Department of Education (DepEd) policies transferring administrative functions from teachers to support personnel. This study examined the engagement and performance of non-teaching personnel in selected elementary schools in the CARSIGMA area of Cavite as the basis for a Career Development Plan. Specifically, it assessed employee engagement across ten dimensions, determined differences in respondents' assessments, examined the performance ratings of non-teaching personnel over three school years, established the relationship between engagement and performance, identified workplace challenges, and evaluated the acceptability of the proposed Career Development Plan. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 198 respondents, comprising one Public Schools District Supervisor, six school heads, and 191 teachers, selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, weighted means, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson product-moment correlation. Results revealed that employee engagement was generally high, while non-teaching personnel consistently received performance ratings ranging from very satisfactory to outstanding. No significant differences were found among the three respondent groups' assessments across the engagement dimensions. Conversely, employee engagement showed a significant positive relationship with performance, indicating that higher engagement was associated with better organizational performance. Workload, communication, technological support, and career advancement emerged as the most frequently encountered concerns. The proposed Career Development Plan was rated highly acceptable by the respondents. The findings emphasize the importance of strengthening leadership support, professional development, transparent communication, and career progression opportunities to sustain employee engagement and organizational effectiveness in public elementary schools.
Keywords
employee engagement, non-teaching personnel, organizational performance, career development, public elementary schools
Downloads
References
1. Aguinis, H. (2023). Performance management (5th ed.). Chicago Business Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2021). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 8(3), 237–264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Armstrong, M. (2022). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice (16th ed.). Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. L. (2021). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(1), 16–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(2), 113–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Civil Service Commission. (2023). 2023 Omnibus Rules on Appointments and Human Resource Actions. Civil Service Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 002, s. 2024: Immediate removal of administrative tasks of public school teachers. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Department of Education. (2023). Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) Manual for Non-Teaching Personnel. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Department of Education. (2023). Basic Education Development Plan 2030. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dessler, G. (2024). Human resource management (17th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2022). Understanding and managing organizational behavior (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2022). Basic econometrics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. International Labour Organization. (2022). Global employment trends. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Judge, T. A., & Robbins, S. P. (2023). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kim, S., & Park, S. (2023). Employee engagement and organizational performance in public organizations: A systematic review. Public Personnel Management, 52(3), 385–407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2022). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Rand McNally. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Luthans, F. (2022). Organizational behavior (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2022). The burnout challenge. Harvard Business Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mone, E. M., & London, M. (2023). Employee engagement through effective performance management (3rd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and organizational performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. OECD. (2024). Education policy outlook 2024. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2022). Sources of method bias in organizational research: A review and recommendations. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 539–569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Essentials of organizational behavior (15th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Saks, A. M. (2022). Caring human resources management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100835. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Saks, A. M. (2023). Employee engagement: Conceptual foundations and future directions. Human Resource Development Review, 22(2), 143–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). The burnout and engagement connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work engagement in theory and practice. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 193–219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Shuck, B., & Herd, A. M. (2022). Employee engagement and leadership in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 535–557. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2022). Using multivariate statistics (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. World Bank. (2023). World development report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study