Environmental Sustainability Disclosure and Firm Market Value: The Mediating Role of Investor Trading Behaviour in Nigerian Industrial Goods Firms

Authors

Amadi, Okechukwu D.

Department of Accounting, Veritas University, Abuja, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Uwaleke, Uche Joe

Department of Accounting, Veritas University, Abuja, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Musa, Success Jibrin

Department of Accounting, Veritas University, Abuja, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000293

Subject Category: Accounting,

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 4542-4556

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-21

Accepted: 2026-09-10

Published: 2026-09-22

Abstract

Environmental sustainability disclosure is becoming increasingly important to capital-market decision making in Nigeria as the country moves toward mandatory ISSB-aligned sustainability reporting. Yet evidence on whether environmental disclosure is reflected in firm value, and the mechanism through which such value relevance may arise, remains inconclusive. This study examines the relationship between environmental sustainability disclosure and firm market value and tests whether investor trading behaviour mediates that relationship. Using a balanced panel of nine industrial goods firms listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group over 2010-2025 (144 firm-year observations), environmental disclosure is measured with a GRI-aligned disclosure index, firm value by Tobin's Q, investor trading behaviour by the natural logarithm of annual share-trading volume, and firm size by the natural logarithm of total assets. Panel diagnostics support random-effects GLS, with firm-clustered robust standard errors used for inference. Environmental disclosure is negatively associated with firm market value (β = -2.655, p = 0.014) but does not significantly predict investor trading behaviour (β = -0.517, p = 0.107). Investor trading behaviour is also not significantly associated with firm market value (β = 0.144, p = 0.514). The estimated indirect effect is -0.0743, and the 5,000-replication firm-cluster bootstrap confidence interval [-0.490, 0.267] includes zero. The findings provide no evidence that annual trading activity mediates the environmental disclosure-firm value relationship and suggest that disclosure breadth alone does not generate a market-value premium in the Nigerian industrial goods sector.

Keywords

Environmental sustainability disclosure; firm market value; Tobin's Q; investor trading behaviour; sustainability reporting; Nigeria

Downloads

References

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Emeka-Nwokeji, N. A., & Osisioma, B. C. (2019). Sustainability disclosures and market value of firms in emerging economy: Evidence from Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 7(3), 1–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. (2026a). Roadmap report for the adoption of IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards in Nigeria (Amended 2026). Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. https://frcnigeria.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Roadmap-Report-for-the-Adoption-of-IFRS-Sustainability-Disclosure-Standards-in-Nigeria-Amended-2026-.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. (2026b). Sustainability Reporting Guideline (SRG1) in Nigeria (2026). Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. https://frcnigeria.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Sustainability-Reporting-Guideline-SRG1-in-Nigeria-2026-SRG-.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI Universal Standards 2021. Global Reporting Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023a). IFRS S1: General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023b). IFRS S2: Climate-related disclosures. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nnedu, S. C. (2025). Sustainability reporting and firm performance: A thematic empirical review. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(12), 901-912. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2024.11120079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nnedu, S. C., Okpanachi, J., & Achema, F. (2025a). Environmental sustainability reporting and the performance of listed consumer goods firms in Nigeria: The moderating effect of firm size. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 2849–2865. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Nnedu, S. C., Okpanachi, J., & Achema, F. (2025b). Sustainability reporting and firm performance: The moderating role of firm size in listed Nigerian consumer goods firms. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(4), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12040083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nnedu, S. C., Okpanachi, J., & Uwaleke, U. (2025). Mandatory sustainability disclosure and firm profitability: Empirical evidence from Nigeria’s consumer goods firms. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 5663–5676. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.909000459 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nwaigwe, N. G., Ofoegbu, G. N., Dibia, N. O., & Nwaogwugwu, C. V. (2022). Sustainability disclosure: Impact of its extent and quality on value of listed firms in Nigeria. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article 2079393. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2079393 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Olagunju, A., & Ajiboye, O. O. (2022). Environmental accounting disclosure and market value of listed non-financial firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 9(7), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7005044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2023). Stock price reactions to ESG news: The role of ESG ratings and disagreement. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(3), 1500–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics, 211(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.12.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles