Exploring School Heads’ Initiatives in Empowering Teacher–Leadership

This qualitative study explored the initiatives undertaken by public elementary school heads in empowering teacher-leadership within the division of Malaybalay City during school year 2024–2025. Guided by transformational leadership theory, distributed leadership theory, and Moustakas’ transcendental phenomenological approach, the study examined how school heads cultivate teacher - leadership, the challenges they encounter, and the capacity-building needs necessary for sustaining empowerment. The research employed a qualitative phenomenological design to gain deep insights into the lived experiences of school heads. Data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs), with validated interview and motive guide questions developed through expert consultation. Fourteen school heads were purposively selected based on their leadership experience and involvement in teacher development programs. Using Moustakas’ (1994) analytical framework—epoche, horizontalization, clustering of meaning units, and synthesis—the findings revealed three core themes: (1) strategic and relational delegation, where leadership roles were assigned intentionally to build teacher capacity and trust; (2) the power of affirmation, which emphasized recognition, inclusion, and emotional support; and (3) leading by example, where school heads modeled integrity, consistency, and commitment to inspire leadership. Challenges included low teacher self-efficacy, reluctance to lead, and systemic constraints such as limited resources. In response, participants advocated for holistic, values-based training and technical capacity-building programs to further empower teacher-leaders. This study affirms the pivotal role of school heads in building collaborative, inclusive, and resilient school cultures through intentional teacher empowerment. The findings contribute to leadership discourse and offer insights for policy-makers, education leaders, and future researchers aiming to strengthen teacher-leadership in the Philippine basic education context.

teacher-leadership, school heads, empowerment, transformational leadership, distributed leadership, qualitative research, phenomenology, Philippine education

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bangs, J., & Frost, D. (2022). Empowering teachers as agents of change: A global perspective on teacher leadership. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bangs, J., & Frost, D. (2022). Empowering teachers as agents of change: A global perspective on teacher leadership. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bush, T. (2008). From management to leadership: Semantic or meaningful change? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207087770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Civil Service Commission. (2017). Competency Framework for Government Leaders and Officers. https://www.csc.gov.ph. Communities in practice: A review of the literature. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(2), 194–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools. Routledge. Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2016). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Department of Education. (2012). National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads (NCBSSH). DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education. (2012). National Competency-Based Standards for School Heads (NCBSSH). DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education. (2016). Guidelines on the organization of school governance councils. DepEd Order No. 83, s. 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education. (2016). Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Department of Education. (2022). Basic Education Development Plan 2030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020. Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017. Research Management Guidelines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015. Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019. Policy Guidelines on the Comprehensive Madrasah Education Program (CMEP). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020. National Adoption and Implementation of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017. National Adoption and Implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. DuFour, R., & Marzano, R. (2015). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Edmondson, A. C. (2019). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Leading professional learning: Emerging practice and evidence. School Leadership & Management, 37(4), 331–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). Short on power, long on responsibility: The paradox of teacher leadership. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 20–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Liang, J., Sandmann, L. R., & McNall, M. A. (2022). Teacher leadership: How teachers influence school culture and change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 611–626. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher leadership in (in)action: Three case studies of contrasting schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143206059537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nguyen, D., Harris, J., & Ng, D. (2020). Distributed leadership in schools: Lens from research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 658–677. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Republic Act No. 10533. Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Republic Act No. 9155. Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2006). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). Teacher empowerment and school climate. Educational Management & Administration, 20(2), 38–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Supovitz, J. A. (2018). Teacher leaders and distributed leadership: Shaping the instructional capacity of schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(4), 427–440. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1206971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Tucker, P. D., Young, M. D., & Arnold, K. (2023). Leadership for learning: How school leaders promote teacher growth and student success. Harvard Education Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Valdez, A. (2019). Challenges of empowering teacher leadership in basic education. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 84(2), 67–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. York-Barr, J., & Strahan, D. (2023). Teacher leadership: The “what,” “why,” and “how” of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Change, 24(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study