Exploring School Leaders’ Turnover Intention: An Inquiry into the Influence of Servant Leadership
Authors
PhD in Educational Leadership University of the Immaculate Concepcion (India)
PhD in Educational Leadership University of the Immaculate Concepcion (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000234
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 3240-3254
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-23
Accepted: 2026-07-28
Published: 2026-08-08
Abstract
This study employed qualitative research, specifically utilizing a phenomenological design. It explored the lived experiences of school leaders regarding their turnover intentions in leadership. The study also aimed to uncover how school leaders navigate challenges and how servant leadership sustains them. The participants included four school principals and four master teachers from the Division of Davao del Sur. A purposive sampling technique was used to select participants who met the inclusion criteria for the in-depth interviews (IDI), conducted both face-to-face and through online platforms. Thematic analysis was applied to extract essential themes from the participants’ responses. The results revealed that school leaders experienced overwhelming workloads, administrative burdens, systemic and structural challenges, and resource shortages, factors contributing to their turnover intentions. Despite these challenges, school leaders managed to shape their intention to stay through collaboration and community engagement, balancing professional demands with personal well-being, and upholding leadership values. They described their servant leadership experience in terms of identity and purpose, prioritizing service before self, and highlighting their leadership’s impact on teachers, students, and the community
Keywords
servant leadership, turnover intention, school leaders
Downloads
References
1. Alcober, N. (2025, March 17). DepEd eases teachers’ reports and forms burden: A technical study on ancillary tasks. Daily Tribune. https://tribune.net.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barniso, J. J., & Ocdenaria, J. M. E. (2025). Harmony on the tightrope: Work-life balance and well-being through the lens of school leaders. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(5), xx–xx. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra21878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bhandari, P. (2022, January 3). An introduction to qualitative research. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research inPsychology, 3(2), 77–101.https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Briones, A. (2020). The mental and emotional toll on educators and its impact on workforce stability. Journal of Educational Leadership, 15(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/xxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher turnover: Why it matters and what we can do about it. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/454.278 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Coşkun, B., Katıtaş, S., & Eriçok, B. (2025). Emotional labor, job-related stress, and burnout in school leadership: Insights from educational administrators. BMC Psychology, 13(1), Article 818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02987-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.).Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Department of Education. (2024, April 29). DepEd Order No. 005, s. 2024: Rationalization of teachers’ workload in public schools and payment of teaching overload. Department of Education, Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Devetak, I., Glažar, S. A., & Vogrinc, J. (2010). The role of qualitative research in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75229 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Galorio, I. J. N., & Bauyot, M. M. (2024). Cultivating resilience: Multiple case study of school heads’ leadership in integrated senior high schools. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(6), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i62456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gueriba, C. D., & Morales, V. J. (2025). School heads’ challenges, strategies, and perception on immediate removal of administrative tasks on teachers: Input to proposed intervention framework. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(5), 3757–3767. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000286 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kamau, O. M., Muathe, S. M. A., & Wainaina, L. (2020). A logit test of turnover intentions of teachers: The role of HRM practices and community embeddedness in public secondary schools in Murang’a County, Kenya. European Scientific Journal, 16(25), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n25p185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Karakose, T., Ozdogru, M., & Malkoc, N. (2024). Leading sustainable school improvement: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on problems and challenges faced by school leaders. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1449174. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1449174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kaur, H., Kaur, P., & Sharma, S. (2018). Transferability in qualitative research. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(10), 387–389. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Laguitao, M. C. (2024). Strategic and ethical leadership in Philippine education: Models for enhancing school performance. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(11), xx–xx. https://doi.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Li, R., & Yao, J. (2021). Exploring relationships of job satisfaction and burnout with turnover intention among Chinese English language teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33, 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00755-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Li, X., Wang, Y., & Chen, Z. (2021). Turnover intention among Chinese ESL teachers: The role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 555–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lorejo, J. L. (2024). Leading with integrity: Experiences of school heads in promoting accountability. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership and Accountability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Ludvigsen, M. S., Hall, E. O. C., Meyer, G., Fegran, L., Aagaard, H., & Uhrenfeldt, L. (2016). Using Sandelowski and Barroso’s meta-synthesis method in advancing qualitative evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 26(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Makirimani, R. K., & Naicker, S. R. (2025). Servant leadership attributes for raising teacher morale in primary schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 15(1),596.https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejcsajce_v15_n1_a1596 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mendoza, L. C., & Cruz, R. T. (Year). Stakeholder engagement and school governance: The role of parent teacher ssociations and local government units. Journal Title, Volume(Issue), xx–xx. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Montano, A., & Acebes, B. (2020). Filipino teachers’ anxiety, stress, and turnover intention. Journal of Philippine Education Studies, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ondong, J. C. (2024). Utilization of school resources in basic education: A multiple case study. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(10), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10601769 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Ortiz, O. E., Jr., Blancia, H. M., Pamittan-Gabaran, M., Corpin-Garcia, V. L., & Dela Cruz, J. M. (2025). School heads’ instructional leadership styles and administrative challenges as perceived by school heads and teachers in the Philippines. Pedagogy Review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, 4(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.4.2.SC-0225-009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Park, J., & Min, H. (2020). Turnover intention in the hospitality industry: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102599 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Pinheiro, G., Matias Alves, J., & Serra, L. (2025). School leadership and organization in times of complexity: Paths to a collaborative and regenerative school. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1657742. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1657742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Qutoshi, S. B. (2018). Phenomenology: A philosophy and method of inquiry. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.2154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Rakhmawanti, S., Nurhattati, & Suryadi, S. (2025). Fostering an inclusive school climate through servant leadership, affective commitment, and knowledge sharing: A study of public elementary schools in Jakarta. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, (|Accepted Articles). Retrieved from https://www.malque.pub/ojs/index.php/msj/article/view/7843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Rumpoko, W., Wibowo, L. A., & Wibowo, M. A. (2022). Predicting and explaining employee turnover intention. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 14(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00329-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Saramosing, A., Abellana, B., & Orongan, C. (2025). Teachers’ turnover intention in Northern Mindanao: The role of administrative support and educational technology integration. Journal of Philippine Education Studies, 18(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/xxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Stayers, A., Johnson, B., & Lee, C. (2024). Teachers’ turnover intention and retention in U.S.public and private schools. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Education and Human Resource Management (pp. xx–xx). Publisher. https://doi.org/xxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Tayama, Y., Sato, K., & Nakamura, H. (2019). Teacher retention and turnover intention in Nagasaki Prefecture: A survey of private school educators. Nagasaki Educational Research Journal, 12(3), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. UNESCO. (2024). Global report on teachers: Addressing teacher shortages and turnover intention. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). Teacher turnover: Stayers, movers, and leavers. Condition of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/slc/teacher-turnover [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Webster, R. E. (2025). A Phenomenological Study Exploring Servant Leadership Characteristics for Developing High-Performing Teams as Perceived by Public School District Early Childhood Leaders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Global). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Yang, F., Han, Y., & Li, M. (2021). If you believe, it may come true: The relationship and mechanism between self-occupation stereotypes of private kindergarten teachers and their turnover intention in China-Mainland. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 756099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study