Facilitators and Barriers to Contraceptive Use among Married Women in Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Authors
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bayelsa Medical University (Nigeria)
Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Bayelsa Medical University (Nigeria)
Department of Social and Public Health Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Bayelsa Medical University (Nigeria)
Department of Social and Public Health Pharmacy Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences Bayelsa Medical University (Nigeria)
Department Faculty, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Pharmacy, University of Africa, Toru-Orua (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000010
Subject Category: REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 115-121
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-14
Accepted: 2026-09-19
Published: 2026-09-29
Abstract
Background: Contraceptive uptake is shaped not only by knowledge but by the practical factors that make a method attractive and accessible, and by the barriers that discourage its use. This study examined the facilitators of contraceptive use, and the access-related barriers that may limit it, among married women in Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted in 2024, examining facilitators and barriers to contraceptive use among 400 married women recruited via a structured, interviewer-administered questionnaire. Facilitator-related items were analysed among the 281 current contraceptive users. Data were analysed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 using frequencies, percentages and the Chi-square test of association, with significance set at p<0.05; distributions are additionally presented as bar and pie charts. Results: Perceived effectiveness (48.4%) and convenience (30.2%) were the leading reasons users chose their method, and both the reason for method choice (X²=158.233, p<0.001) and the source of supply (X²=114.609, p<0.001) showed statistically significant patterns. Government hospitals were the leading source of supply (65.1%), and most users found contraceptives very easy (58.4%) or easy (17.8%) to access (X²=120.551, p<0.001), although 23.8% reported some degree of difficulty. Only 13.5% of users reported ever experiencing side effects, a significant pattern (X²=15.067, p=0.001). Barriers among non-users could not be quantitatively reconstructed from the dataset, as the corresponding item was captured for only a small number of respondents; qualitatively, mistrust of contraceptives was the barrier most frequently mentioned by those non-users for whom data were recorded. Conclusion: Perceived effectiveness, convenience and easy access via government health facilities are the principal facilitators of contraceptive use in this community, while access difficulty and, to a lesser extent, mistrust and fear of side effects, remain relevant barriers for a minority of women. Strengthening supply consistency at government facilities and proactively addressing mistrust could further improve uptake.
Keywords
facilitators; barriers; contraceptive use; access; married women; Amassoma; Bayelsa State; Nigeria
Downloads
References
1. Sinai I, Omoluabi E, Jimoh A, Jurczynska K. Unmet need for family planning and barriers to contraceptive use in Kaduna, Nigeria: culture, myths and perceptions. Cult Health Sex. 2020;22(11):1253-1268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Okigbo CC, Speizer IS, Domino ME, Curtis SL. Determinants of contraceptive use among Nigerian couples: evidence from the 2013 Demographic and Health Survey. Contracept Reprod Med. 2017;2:9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ajayi AI, Adeniyi OV, Akpan W. Use of traditional and modern contraceptives among childbearing women: findings from a mixed methods study in two southwestern Nigerian states. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:604. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ajayi AI, Akpan W. Determinants of condom use among parous women in North Central and South Western Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Donkoh IE, Okyere J, Seidu A-A, Ahinkorah BO, Aboagye RG, Yaya S. Association between knowledge and use of contraceptive among women of reproductive age in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(5):e2028. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dambo ND, Jeremiah I, Wallymahmed A. Determinants of contraceptive use by women in the central senatorial zone of Bayelsa State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey. Niger Med J. 2017;58(1):26-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Oguche OI, Okeafor I, Adesina AD, Mariere UI, Babatunde S. Unmet need, demand and potential demand met for family planning services among urban and rural women in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. J Coll Community Physicians Sri Lanka. 2022;28(2):112-120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Abdulkadir FL, Madaki PD, Muhammad HA, Abdel-Sadiq SA, Abdullahi B, Manzo RS, Abdullahi A, Ezenwa-Ahanene S. Regional disparities in family planning knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers among reproductive-age women in Nigeria: a comparative study of Kano and Bayelsa States. J Interv Epidemiol Public Health. 2026;9(2):73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]