From Leaf to Livelihood: The Role of Welfare in Shaping Job Satisfaction in Tea Plantations

Authors

Ms. Usha M

Assistant Professor, Vivekananda Institute of Management Studies, Coimbatore (India)

Mr. Sridhar R

II MBA, Vivekananda Institute of Management Studies, Coimbatore (India)

Mr. Shri Nithish

II MBA, Vivekananda Institute of Management Studies, Coimbatore (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.13010063

Subject Category: Human Resource Management

Volume/Issue: 13/1 | Page No: 731-739

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-01-05

Accepted: 2026-01-10

Published: 2026-01-30

Abstract

The tea plantation industry in India, a significant rural employer, heavily relies on a stable and satisfied workforce. This study investigates the role of employee welfare measures in shaping job satisfaction, with a special focus on Dollar Tea Industry, Kotagiri. Drawing on responses from 142 employees across departments, the research evaluates statutory and non-statutory welfare provisions and their correlation with job satisfaction. The findings indicate a strong positive relationship between welfare measures and employee satisfaction (r = 0.827, p < 0.01), whereas the work environment, though correlated, had no significant predictive value. The regression model (R² = 0.685) affirms that robust welfare schemes are key drivers of satisfaction in rural industrial settings. This study offers actionable insights for HR practitioners and plantation managers to align welfare strategies with employee needs.

Keywords

Employee welfare, job satisfaction, tea plantation, work environment

Downloads

References

1. Anand, R., & Thomas, A. (2022). Participatory welfare practices and employee commitment in plantation labor. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(1), 87–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bharathi, S., & Kumar, R. (2020). Impact of statutory and non-statutory welfare measures on employee satisfaction in plantation industries. International Journal of Human Resource and Social Sciences, 7(1), 52–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Boamah, S. A., Read, E. A., & Spence Laschinger, H. K. (2018). The influence of workplace policies on job satisfaction. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 81, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Das, P., & Joseph, M. (2020). Comparative welfare analysis of Assam and Kerala plantations. Indian Journal of Labour Studies, 11(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Devi, K., & Suma, K. (2021). Employee welfare and job satisfaction in plantation sector. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 8(2), 115–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. George, L., & Ramanathan, S. (2021). Welfare policies during the pandemic: Case study of tea estates. Journal of Contemporary Labour Policy, 8(4), 73–85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hilton, M., Skelton, R., & Boamah, S. (2021). Emotional well-being and job satisfaction: A developing region perspective. International Journal of Workplace Studies, 12(3), 50–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. World Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Josephine, M., & Raj, D. (2023). Gender-sensitive welfare in tea estates. South Asian Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(1), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kumar, N., & Joseph, R. (2020). Welfare under Plantation Labour Act. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 10(4), 23–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lakshmi, R., & John, M. (2023). Healthcare welfare in Indian tea plantations. Indian Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 11(2), 44–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1297–1349). Rand McNally. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mohanraj, M., & Vasanthi, R. (2019). Welfare facilities and satisfaction in plantations. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 14(3), 65–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mullins, L. J. (2005). Management and Organisational Behaviour (7th ed.). FT Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Patel, M., & Bhat, R. (2021). Revisiting welfare policies in plantation economy. Journal of Labour Economics and Welfare Studies, 5(1), 12–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rao, P. S. (2020). Human Resource Management: Text and Cases. Himalaya Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ramesh, S., & Thomas, G. (2021). Psychological effects of welfare on plantation workers. Journal of Rural Development and Management, 10(3), 90–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Selvi, P., & Dhanasekaran, K. (2022). Living conditions and job satisfaction. Journal of Housing and Social Development, 13(1), 25–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sesen, H., & Ertan, H. (2021). The psychological impact of welfare practices in emerging markets. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 95–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Shankar, R., & Pillai, V. (2023). Digitization of welfare practices. Indian Journal of HR Innovation, 9(2), 118–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Skelton, R., Hilton, M., & Boamah, S. (2019). Job satisfaction in developing regions. International Journal of Workplace Studies, 12(3), 50–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Souza, M. (2009). Dimensions of welfare and job satisfaction in pharma industry. Asian Journal of HRM, 3(1), 29–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vinod, K., & Meera, D. (2022). Education and family security in tea plantations. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 14(1), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles