From Perceived Gender Bias to Trust in AI-Enabled Digital Lending: A Procedural Fairness Framework for Nigeria

Potential exists for AI-based and alternative data scoring to increase the availability of credit, and for discrimination based on gender or gendered data to further entrench structural disadvantage, or create an impression that gender data was used in the decision-making process. While research has previously considered statistical fairness, explainability, and technology acceptance, there is little understanding of the interpretive process through which discrimination allegations are turned into distrust. This conceptual article develops a procedural fairness process model for artificial intelligence enabled digital lending in Nigeria. It integrates contemporary research on procedural justice, algorithmic trust, and institutional assurance to outline a process in which individuals interpret decision clues, causally associate decisions with gender or gender-related data, evaluate procedural neutrality, correctness, accuracy, and appeal ability, and finally adjust their trust towards the algorithm and lending institution. Explanation, credible contestability, and successful human reassessment are considered as procedural fairness generators, rather than as alternatives to transparency. The perception of regulatory assurance dictates whether a fair process of platform lending leads to trust, while outcome favorability and attribution ambiguity determine initial assessments. The proposed framework separates perceived bias from measured disparity, procedural from distributive fairness, and trust from continued use despite financial necessity. Nigeria is viewed as a setting that defines the study due to the nature of informality, inequality of digital footprints, device sharing practices, different levels of literacy, and emerging consumer protection institutions. The article formulates revised hypotheses, competing theories, and a multi-method agenda for empirical research.

algorithmic fairness; artificial intelligence; digital lending; gender bias; Nigeria

1. Bartlett, R., Morse, A., Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2022). Consumer-lending discrimination in the FinTech era. Journal of Financial Economics, 143(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2020). On the rise of FinTechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 2845–2897. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz099 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Burton, J. W., Stein, M.-K., & Jensen, T. B. (2020). A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fatehkia, M., Kashyap, R., & Weber, I. (2018). The gender gap in internet and mobile phone penetration: A data-driven analysis. World Development, 108, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. (2025). Digital, Electronic, Online, or Non-Traditional Consumer Lending Regulations, 2025. https://fccpc.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Digital-Electronic-Online-or-Non-Traditional-Consumer-Lending-Regulations-2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2022). Predictably unequal? The effects of machine learning on credit markets. The Journal of Finance, 77(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2019). The roles of alternative data and machine learning in FinTech lending: Evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform. Financial Management, 48(4), 1009–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Köchling, A., & Wehner, M. C. (2020). Discriminated by an algorithm: A systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in HR recruitment and HR development. Business Research, 13, 795–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lee, M. K., Jain, A., Cha, H. J., Ojha, S., & Kusbit, D. (2019). Procedural justice in algorithmic fairness: Leveraging transparency and outcome control for fair algorithmic mediation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), Article 182, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35, Article 115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nigeria Data Protection Commission. (2025). Nigeria Data Protection Act—General Application and Implementation Directive (NDP Act–GAID), 2025. https://ndpc.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/NDP-ACT-GAID-2025-MARCH-20TH.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, Article 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Shulner-Tal, A., Kuflik, T., & Kliger, D. (2023). Enhancing fairness perception: Towards human-centred AI and personalized explanations. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(7), 1455–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2095705 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition