From Ritual to Dialogue: The Evolution of Indigenous Land Conflict Resolution Mechanisms

Indigenous communities have long depended on culturally rooted systems to manage disputes and sustain social harmony. This study examined the historical development of land conflict resolution in Liwon, Asipulo, Ifugao, focusing on traditional mechanisms, their transformation, and the cultural values that continue to guide community-based justice. Using a historical research design, data were collected through interviews with elders and supported by secondary sources. Findings revealed that land disputes were traditionally resolved through elder mediation, bultong or ritual wrestling, and uggub or dart ordeal, all of which emphasized ancestral authority, communal participation, and reconciliation. These mechanisms gradually changed after Asipulo became an independent municipality in 1992 and as cadastral surveys, land titling programs, and formal legal procedures were introduced. Ritual-based systems shifted from judicial use to cultural expression, while the tongtongan emerged as a hybrid process combining traditional dialogue with barangay-level legal requirements. Despite these transformations, values such as pihyew or moral restraint, binnaddang or collective cooperation, respect for elders, and the prioritization of harmony remain central to resolving conflicts. Future research may explore how other Indigenous communities adapt their conflict resolution systems amid changing legal and cultural environments.

ancestral practices, conflict resolution, cultural values, indigenous justice

1. Abdo, M. R. (2024). Conflict resolution through Indigenous knowledge systems: The case of the Gumuz community in northwest Ethiopia. Africa Review, 16(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1163/09744061-00000001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bercovitch, J., & Jackson, R. (2009). Conflict resolution in the twenty-first century: Principles, methods, and approaches. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.106467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bloomfield, D., Fischer, M., & Schmelzle, B. (2006). Social change and conflict transformation. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management. https://berghof-foundation.org/library/social-change-and-conflict-transformation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Calde, N. L. (2021). Customary laws, ancestral land titling and the NCIP’s quasi judicial powers. The Cordillera Review. https://thecordillerareview.upb.edu.ph/abstract/customary-laws-ancestral-land-titling-and-the-ncips-quasi-judicial-powers/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dayson, C. J. P., Ayo, J. P. D., Equipado, B. D., Polon, J. H., Buban, R. G., & Digo, G. S. (2024). A systematic review and meta-synthesis of Indigenous Filipino values in educational leadership. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 17(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14456/jcdr-hs.2024.24 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garcia, M. A. (2019). Restorative justice in action: The Kalinga experience. International Journal of Research and Development Organization,5(1),45–56. https://www.ijrdo.org/index.php/sshr/article/view/3030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Garing, J., Firdaus, W., Herianah, H., Ridwan, M., Erniati, E., Budiono, S., & Pariela, T. D. (2023). Identifying and resolving conflicts using local wisdom: A qualitative study. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(4), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i3.156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Herman, D. H. J. (2017). Restorative justice and retributive justice: An opportunity for cooperation or an occasion for conflict in the search for justice. Seattle Journal for Social Justice, 16(1), Article 11. https://www.antoniocasella.eu/restorative/Hermann_2017.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hobson, J. M. (2022). Unmasking the racism of orthodox international relations/international political economy theory. Security Dialogue, 53(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211061084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press. https://www.usip.org/publications/1997/01/building-peace-sustainable-reconciliation-divided-societies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lederach, J. P. (2014). The little book of conflict transformation: Clear articulation of the guiding principles. Good Books. https://professorbellreadings.wordpress.com/wp content/uploads/2017/10/the-little-books-of-justice-peacebuilding- john-lederach-the-little-book-of-conflict-transformation-good-books-2014- 1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Panaten, G. B., Fabian, J. P., Almoite, J. C., Sagalla, A. J. S., & Rufino, Z. V. (2023). Mankusjon—Traditional Ibaloi settlement of disputes in aid of the Philippine criminal justice system. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 8(9).https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2309164.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pavlacic, J. M., Kellum, K. K., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2022). Advocating for the use of restorative justice practices: Examining the overlap between restorative justice and behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(4), 1237– 1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00632-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Perez, P. L. (2021). Governing Indigenous people: Indigenous persons in government implementing the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act. The Cordillera Review, 1(2), 53–85. https://thecordillerareview.upb.edu.ph/abstract/governing- indigenous-people-indigenous-persons-in-government-implementing-the-indigenous-peoples-rights-act/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ragandang, P. I. C. (2018). Philippines: A review of the traditional conflict resolution practices among indigenous cultural communities. Conflict Studies Quarterly, 23(4), 78–90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324911820_Philippines_A_Review_of_the_Traditional_Conflict_Resolution_Practices_Among_Indigenous_Cultural_Communities [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rakgwata, P. A., & Tumelo, S. (2024). Conflict resolution in Indigenous communities: A social work perspective. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(10), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i10.3789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. San Jose, A., Sarno, J. M., Magonalig, C., Laro, A., & Deseo, J. A. (2019). Customary conflict resolutions among tribes: Young Indigenous Peoples’ perspectives in focus. SPAMAST Research Journal, 2(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.64656/spamastrj.v2i1.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shem-Tov, Y., Raphael, S., & Skog, A. (2024). Can restorative justice conferencing reduce recidivism? Evidence from the Make-It- Right program. Econometrica, 92(1), 61–78. https://www.capolicylab.org/wp- content/uploads/2024/01/Can-Restorative-Justice-Conferencing-Reduce-Recidivism-Evidence-from-the-Make-it-Right-Program-1.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Syaufi, A., Zahra, A. F., & Mursidah. (2021). The criminal settlement through customary law from a restorative justice perspective. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 1–12. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-criminal-settlement-through- customary- law-from-restorative-justice-perspective-11469.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tanjung, M. A. (2023). Legal pluralism and indigenous justice systems: An anthropological analysis. Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika (ARMADA),3(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.59613/armada.v3i2.2838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Teshale, T. (2014). The role of Indigenous knowledge systems and institutions in conflict resolution among pastoralists of Kenya-Uganda border area [Doctoral dissertation, Addis Ababa University]. https://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/12345678/386 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tohari, A. (2025). The role of local wisdom in creating peace and social harmony in villages: Cultural and traditional perspectives. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 13(1), 316–325. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394908077_The_role_of_local_wi sdom_i n_creating_peace_and_social_harmony_in_villages_cultural_and_traditional_perspectives [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ty, E., & Bibon-Ruiz, S. (2015). Indigenous peoples, conflicts, and peacebuilding: A case study of the Aetas of Central Philippines. Asia Pacific World, 6(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.14227/apw/6.1.2015.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ubink, J. (2018). The complexity of legal pluralist settings. In O. Zenker & M. V. Hoehne (Eds.), The state and the paradox of customary law in Africa (pp. 213–226). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315552491-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar