From Sustainability to Profitability: The Role of SDGs in Malaysian Companies
Authors
Faculty Economics & Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) (Malaysia)
Faculty of Economics & Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) (Malaysia)
Kolej Komuniti Bagan Serai (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Science & Humanities, University Malaysia Sabah (UMS) (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka (Malaysia)
Jabatan Sejarah, Fakulti Sains Kemanusian, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.130200186
Subject Category: FINANCE
Volume/Issue: 13/2 | Page No: 2021-2032
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-02-26
Accepted: 2026-03-02
Published: 2026-03-20
Abstract
The high initial costs of sustainable efforts and the challenges in assessing long-term returns make it difficult to link profitability with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study investigates the relationship between SDGs and profitability in Malaysian listed companies. According to the Resource Dependency Theory, companies can enhance profitability and market positioning by strategically managing external dependencies to obtain resources and support, aligning with SDGs. Such alignment will help secure essential resources and improve operational efficiency. The study analyzed data from 73 Malaysian companies during 2021-2022. SDGs data were obtained from official company websites, while other variables company size, debts, liquidity, and profitability were sourced from annual reports. Regression results indicate a negative relationship between SDGs and profitability. While SDGs like environmental and social initiatives may increase costs and reduce short-term profits, they offer long-term benefits, such as improved reputation and customer loyalty. The study recommends that companies align SDGs with their core strengths and seek government support to mitigate financial burdens. Policymakers should provide incentives, such as tax breaks and subsidies, to encourage SDGs adoption. Finally, the study emphasizes the importance of balancing profitability with sustainability to ensure long-term success and societal impact.
Keywords
Resource dependency theory, sustainability, Sustainable Development Goals
Downloads
References
1. Ahmed, A. M., Sharif, N. A., Ali, M. N., &Hágen, I. (2023). Effect of firm size on the association between capital structure and profitability. Sustainability, 15(14), 11196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aremo, A. A., &Ayorinde, Y. O. (2022). Lease Financing and Financial Performance of Listed Manufacturing Companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 10(6), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bose, S., Khan, H. Z., &Bakshi, S. (2024). Determinants and consequences of sustainable development goals disclosure: International evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Buniamin, S., Jaffar, R., Ahmad, N., &Johari, N. H. (2022). The role of corporate governance in achieving SDGs among Malaysian companies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(3), 326-326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Business and Sustainable Development Commission. (2017). Better business better world–The report of the Business & Sustainable Development Commission. Available at:(accessed 16 October 2021): http://report. businesscommission. org/uploads/BetterBiz-BetterWorld_170215_012417. pdf, 2, 63-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Camilleri, M. A. (2018). Closing the loop for resource efficiency, sustainable consumption and production: A critical review of the circular economy. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 21(1-4), 1-17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Djohan, D. (2023). The Analysis of Liquidity Ratio as Tool to Measure Financial Position in PT. Iplug Indonesia at Medan. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 5(3), 322-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. ESCAP, U. (2023). SDG 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. FallahShayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., &Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), 1222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hamad, S., Lai, F. W., Shad, M. K., Khatib, S. F., & Ali, S. E. A. (2023). Assessing the implementation of sustainable development goals: does integrated reporting matter?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(1), 49-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jevremović, N. (2022). Enforcing Sustainability Clauses in Global Supply Chains with a Focus on Proactive and Relational Contract Theory: Case of SDG 12. ZEuSZeitschriftfürEuroparechtlicheStudien, 25(2), 393-418. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Keller,G., &Warrack,B.(Eds.). (2005). Statistics for management and economics (Fifthed.): Pacific Grove. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Khaled, R., Ali, H., & Mohamed, E. K. (2021). The Sustainable Development Goals and corporate sustainability performance: Mapping, extent and determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Khan, P. A., Johl, S. K., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Vinculum of sustainable development goal practices and firms’ financial performance: A moderation role of green innovation. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), 96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lam, K. C., Sami, H., & Zhou, H. (2012). The role of cross-listing, foreign ownership and state ownership in dividend policy in an emerging market. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5(3), 199-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Murphy, D. F., & Stott, L. (2021). Partnerships for the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Sustainability, 13(2), 658. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nguyen, Q. N., Pham, K. X., & Nguyen, L. P. (2024). Impact of debt structure on profitability of non-financial listed joint-stock firms. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 13(1), 377-387. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nukala, V. B., &Prasada Rao, S. S. (2021). Role of debt-to-equity ratio in project investment valuation, assessing risk and return in capital markets. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ozili, P. K. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals and bank profitability: International evidence. Modern Finance, 1(1), 70-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Paetzold, F., Busch, T., Utz, S., &Kellers, A. (2022). Between impact and returns: Private investors and the sustainable development goals. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3182-3197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Pfeffer, J. (1987). A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations. Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business, 1(1), 25-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Scharlemann, J. P., Brock, R. C., Balfour, N., Brown, C., Burgess, N. D., Guth, M. K., &Kapos, V. (2020). Towards understanding interactions between Sustainable Development Goals: The role of environment–human linkages. Sustainability science, 15, 1573-1584. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Zhan, J. X., & Santos-Paulino, A. U. (2021). Investing in the Sustainable Development Goals: Mobilization, channeling, and impact. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 166-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Financial Technology (Fintech): Current Research at The Cutting Edge
- Reforming Corporate Governance in Malaysia to Address Fraudulent Financial Reporting Cases
- Stock Market Efficiency and Economic Diversification in Nigeria and South Africa
- Financial Stability and Financial Performance of Small and Medium Tiered Deposit Taking Savings and Credit Cooperatives in Kenya.
- Regulator Sandboxes for DeFi: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Effectiveness in the EU, US, and Asia Pacific