From the Paddy Field to the Phone Screen: Bihu, Social Media and the Remaking of a Festival in Assam
Authors
Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Eraligool, Sribhumi, Assam, 788723 (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1310000040
Subject Category: Cultural Studies
Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 590-596
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-17
Accepted: 2026-10-22
Published: 2026-10-30
Abstract
Bihu is the central festival of Assamese social life. It marks the farming year and gives the people of Assam a shared language of song, dance and food. In recent decades its performance has moved from the village field to the organised stage and then to the phone screen. Most writing on Bihu either describes its origins and forms or laments its commercialisation, and little asks how ordinary people use digital media to take part in the festival. This paper examines how Bihu has moved from agricultural ritual to public spectacle and then to digital expression, who appears to take part in digital Bihu and who is left out, and what this means for ideas of tradition and authenticity. The study is qualitative and desk-based. It combines scholarly literature and published reports with structured observation of publicly available Bohag Bihu content on instagram and youtube during April and May 2026, selected by stated criteria and analysed through a six-step thematic analysis. The analysis suggests that social media has widened participation, especially for Assamese people living outside Assam, and has given young people a way to claim Bihu in their own style. At the same time, platforms appear to reward what is short, bright and shareable, while the quieter ritual parts of the festival and the voices of elders, rural households and smaller communities seem less visible. The paper separates what was observed, what published sources report and what is theoretical interpretation. It concludes that digital Bihu is better understood as a continuation of a festival that has always changed with its times than as a loss of tradition, and that the question of who controls its image deserves continuing attention. Because the study relies on a limited period of observation and includes no interviews, its findings are interpretive, cannot be generalised, and offer a basis for future fieldwork.
Keywords
Bihu, social media, digital heritage, tradition, cultural identity, Assam
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baruah, S. (1999). India against itself: Assam and the politics of nationality. University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bhuyan, H. R. (2025, April 13). Bihu's journey from fields to global screens. The Sentinel (Assam). https://www.sentinelassam.com/more-news/editorial/bihus-journey-from-fields-to-global-screens [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd ed.). Polity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Giaccardi, E. (Ed.). (2012). Heritage and social media: Understanding heritage in a participatory culture. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Berg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Misra, U. (2000). The periphery strikes back: Challenges to the nation-state in Assam and Nagaland. Indian Institute of Advanced Study. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sonowal, J., & Choudhury, D. (2024). Role of social media in promoting folk dance: A review study with reference to Bihu dance of Assam. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Influence of Korean Popular Culture on Filipino Millennials: An Assessment Across Food, Fashion, Entertainment, and Beauty Products
- Narrating the Self and Constructing History: A Biography Appreciation Theory Analysis of Gandhi, Chaplin, and Hitler
- Food and Culture in Kashmiri Writings
- When East Meets West: Cross-Cultural Challenges in a Tourist’s Guide to Love
- Cultural Mapping of Movable and Immovable Tangible Cultural Properties of Morong, Bataan: Basis for the Development of Information, Education, and Communication Materials