Gender, Equity, and Inclusion: Understanding the Classroom Challenges of Tribal Girls through an Intersectional Lens

Although India has traditionally adhered to the principle of inclusive education, the tribal girls were still being excluded on a systematic basis in classrooms. This paper will focus on the role of gender, linguistic hierarchy, as well as cultural invisibility in their participation, voice, and academic confidence. The study is based on the intersectionality framework by Kimberlé Crenshaw and applies conceptual and policy analysis of the national reports and existing literature critically. The results demonstrate that exclusion acts in the everyday pedagogical life, in the way of curriculum representation, and in the institutional norms but not in the separate socio-economic factors. The study points out that inclusion should go beyond access to recognition and meaningful involvement, and it involves culturally responsive, multilingual, and gender-sensitive practices in pedagogy.

Cultural Recognition, Gender Equity, Inclusive Education, Intersectionality, Linguistic Hierarchy, Tribal Girls

1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Atewologun, D. (2018). Intersectionality theory and practice. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Battiste, M. (2013). Decolonizing education: Nourishing the learning spirit. Purich Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brayboy, B. M. J. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M., & Tomlinson, B. (2013). Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dunne, M. (2007). Gender, sexuality and schooling: Everyday life in junior secondary schools in Botswana and Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(5), 499–511. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jha, J., & Jhingran, D. (2002). Elementary education for the poorest and other deprived groups. Centre for Policy Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lal, M. (2005). Education as the inclusive growth strategy for the economically and socially disadvantaged in society. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 19(3), 257–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Maharana, A. (2025). Transforming tribal lives with the power of education. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.48938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. May, S. (2012). Language and minority rights (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ministry of Education. (2020). National education policy 2020. Government of India. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India. (2023). Annual report 2022–23. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. National Statistical Office. (2019). Key indicators of household social consumption on education in India (NSS 75th Round). Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Census of India 2011: Primary census abstract for Scheduled Tribes. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Reddy, B. R. P. (2021). A brief review on tribal education in India. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(6), 45–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies (2nd ed.). Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sujatha, K. (2002). Education among Scheduled Tribes. In R. Govinda (Ed.), India education report: A profile of basic education (pp. 87–102). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Unified District Information System for Education Plus (UDISE+). (2024). UDISE+ flash statistics 2023–24. Department of School Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Unterhalter, E. (2005). Gender equality in education: Definitions and measurements. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(2), 111–122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study