Gender-Related Values and Preferences of Resource Users in a Municipal Marine Protected Area in the Philippines

Marine Protected Areas (MPA) were established in the Philippines to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems. In the Municipality of Sagñay, Philippines, the Atulayan Bay Fish Sanctuary and Marine Reserve (Atulayan MPA) was established three decades ago for such purpose. However, the expected socio-ecological impacts remained elusive based on biophysical and socioeconomic indicators. Community-Based Coastal Resource Management (CBCRM) was one approach used by the municipality to engage resource users and communities in MPA management. This study assessed the preferences of resource users toward the ecosystem services of the Atulayan MPA and the underlying value orientation that influenced these preferences. Specifically, it described the ecosystem services, examined the values of resource users, and analyzed the stated preferences of resource users toward the ecosystem services based on their value orientation from a gender-related perspective. Survey was conducted in the village of Atulayan with 50 respondents and in Nato with 250. Key informant interview was conducted with the fisheries technologist of the Municipal Agriculture Office (MAO). Findings revealed that both resource users and residents in the two villages espoused the values of conservation and self-transcendence, while most of them preferred the ecosystem services of fisheries, habitat, coastal protection, and research and education. This study recommends that the MAO strengthen engagement with resource users and communities in MPA management by using approaches that are aligned with their value orientation and stated preferences. This would increase the likelihood that MPA-related interventions may be supported and actively engaged in by the resource users.

Marine Protected Area, basic human values

1. Bradecina, R. G. (2008). Socioeconomic conditions and governance in the Atulayan Bay Marine Protected Area. Kuroshio Science, 85-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Brown, T. (1998). The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics, 3-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dela Vega, J. M., Predo, C. D., Florece, L. M., & Sobremisana, M. J. (2019). Fisherfolks' willingness to pay for the conservation of Atulayan Bay Marine Protected Area in Sagñay, Camarines Sur, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 55-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dela Vega-Dacillo, J. M., Shinbo, T., & Bradecina, R. G. (2021). Fisherfolks' perception and awareness in Atulayan MPA: Evidence from Sagñay, Camarines Sur, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 335-372. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gorris, P. (2019). Mind the gap between aspiration and practice in co-managing marine protected areas: A case study from Negros Occidental, Philippines. Marine Policy, 12-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jones, N., Shaw, S., Ross, H., Witt, K., & Pinner, B. (2016). The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lasswell, H. & Holmberg, A. (1992). Toward a general theory of directed value accumulation and institutional development. In H. Lasswell, & M. McDougal, Jurisprudence for a free society: studies in law, science and policy (pp. 1379-1417). The Hague: Kluwer Law International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Maliao, R. J., Pomeroy, R. S., & Turingan, R. G. (2009). Performance of community-based coastal resource management (CBCRM) programs in the Philippines: A meta-analysis. Marine Policy, 818-825. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Manfredo, M., Bruskotter, J., Teel, T., Fulton, D., Schwartz, S., Arlinghaus, R. & Sullivan, L. (2017). Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conservation Biology, 772-780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mattson, D., Karl, H. & Clark, S. (2012). Values in natural resource management and policy. In H. Karl, L. Scarlett, J. Vargas-Moreno, & M. Flaxman, Restoring Lands - Coordinating Science, Politics and Action (pp. 239-259). Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Olaño, V. L., Lanzuela, N. S., & Paredes, K. S. (2017). Assessment of fishery resources in the Lagonoy Gulf, Philippines. The Philippine Journal of Fisheries, 62-76. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. O'Neill, J. (2007). Markets, deliberation and environment. London and New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. PSA (2021) 2020 Census of Population and Housing (2020 CPH) Population Counts Declared Official by President. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021, July 7). Retrieved from Philippine Statistics Authority: https://psa.gov.ph/content/2020-census-population-and-housing-2020-cph-population-counts-declared-official-president [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Schutter, M. S., Hicks, C. C., Phelps, J., & Belmont, C. (2021). Disentangling ecosystem services preferences and values. World Development, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1-65. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. 23-47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Schwartz, S. (2012). A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations. In ESS Questionnaire (pp. 259-319). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Schwartz, S. (2016). Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. In T. Brosch, & D. Sander, Handbook of value: Perspective from economics, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology and sociology (pp. 63-84). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schwartz, S. H. (2021). A repository of Schwartz value scales with instructions and an introduction. 5 September 2021. Retrieved from Online Readings in Psychology and Culture: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss2/9/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. (2021). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the revised portrait value questionnaire. Assessment, 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 1273-1285. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Song, A. M., Chuenpagdee, R. & Jentoft, S. (2013). Values, images, and principles: What they represent and how they may improve fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 167-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Witte, E. H., Stanciu, A. & Boehnke, K. (2020). A new empirical approach to intercultural comparisons of value preferences based on Schwartz's theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.